Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 216, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 386-396

  Trietsch, Dan ^a   Mazmanyan, Lilit ^a   Gevorgyan, Lilit ^a   Baker, Kenneth R ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA   (Armenia)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Linear association; Lognormal scheduling; Parkinson distribution; PERT; Project scheduling; Stochastic scheduling

Indexed keywords

PERT; SCHEDULING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

LINEAR ASSOCIATIONS; LOGNORMAL SCHEDULING; PARKINSON DISTRIBUTION; PROJECT SCHEDULING; STOCHASTIC SCHEDULING;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84859211119     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.054     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ash, R. C., Pittman, P. H., 2008. Towards holistic project scheduling using critical chain methodology enhanced with PERT buffering. International Journal of Project Organization and Management 2, 185-203.
2. Aytug, H., Lawley, M. A., McKay, K., Mohan, S., Uzsoy, R., 2005. Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions. European Journal of Operational Research 161, 86-110.
3. Baker, K. R., Trietsch, D., 2009a. Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4. Baker, K. R., Trietsch, D., 2009b. Safe scheduling: Setting due dates in single-machine problems. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 69-77.
5. Baker, K. R., Trietsch, D., 2010a. Research Notes for Chapter 6 in Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley .
6. Baker, K. R., Trietsch, D., 2010b. Research Notes for Appendix A in Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley .
7. Bendavid, I., Golany, A., 2009. Setting gates for activities in the stochastic project scheduling problem through the cross entropy methodology. Annals of Operations Research 172, 259-276.
8. Black, G., McKay, K. N., Morton, T. E., 2006. Aversion scheduling in the presence of risky jobs. European Journal of Operational Research 175, 338-361.
9. Blom, G., 1958. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Bregman, R., 2009. A heuristic procedure for solving the dynamic probabilistic project expediting problem. European Journal of Operational Research 192, 125-137.
11. Britney, R. R., 1976. Bayesian point estimation and the PERT scheduling of stochastic activities. Management Science 22, 938-948.
12. Bruno, J., Downey, P., Frederickson, G., 1981. Sequencing tasks with exponential service times to minimize the expected flow time or makespan. Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery 28, 100-113.
13. Buzacott, J. A., Shanthikumar, J. G., 1993. Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems. Prentice Hall.
14. Clark, C. E., 1961. The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Operations Research 9, 145-162.
15. Clark, C. E., 1962. The PERT model for the distribution of an activity time. Operations Research 10, 405-406.
16. Dablaere, F., Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., 2011. Proactive policies for the stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research 214(2), 308-316.
17. Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., 2002. Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Elmaghraby, S. E., 2005. On the fallacy of averages in project risk management. European Journal of Operational Research 165, 307-313.
19. Esary, J. D., Proschan, F., Walkup, D. W., 1967. Association of random variables, with applications. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 1466-1474.
20. Filliben, J. J., 1975. The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 17, 111-117.
21. Goldratt, E. M., 1997. Critical Chain. North River Press.
22. Grubbs, F. E., 1962. Attempts to validate certain PERT statistics or picking on PERT. Operations Research 10, 912-915.
23. Gutierrez, G. J., Kouvelis, P., 1991. Parkinson's law and its implications for project management. Management Science 37, 990-1001.
24. Gutjahr, W. J., Strauss, C., Wagner, E., 2000. A stochastic branch-and-bound approach to activity crashing in project management. INFORMS Journal on Computing 12, 125-135.
25. Hahn, E. D., 2008. Mixture densities for project management activity times: A robust approach to PERT. European Journal of Operational Research 188, 450-459.
26. Herroelen, W., Leus, R., 2005. Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research 165, 289-306.
27. Hill, J., Thomas, L. C., Allen, D. E., 2000. Experts' estimates of task durations in software development projects. International Journal of Project Management 18, 13-21.
28. Johnston, J., Dinardo, J., 1997. Econometric Methods, fourth ed. McGraw-Hill//Irwin, New York.
29. Kelley, J. E., 1961. Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Operations Research 9(3), 296-320.
30. Klingel, A. R., 1966. Bias in PERT project completion time calculations for a real network. Management Science (Series B) 13, B194-B201.
31. Kotiah, T. C. T., Wallace, N. D., 1973. Another look at the PERT assumptions. Management Science 20, 44-49.
32. Ku, P.-S., Niu, S.-C., 1986. On Johnson's two-machine flow shop with random processing times. Operations Research 34, 130-136.
33. Lipke, W., Zwikael, O., Henderson, K., Anbari, F., 2009. Prediction of project outcome: The application of statistical methods to earned value management and earned schedule performance indexes. International Journal of Project Management 27, 400-407.
34. Looney, S. W., Gulledge, T. R., 1985. Use of the correlation coefficient with normal probability plots. The American Statistician 39(1), 75-79.
35. Malcolm, D. G., Roseboom, J. H., Clark, C. E., Fazar, W., 1959. Application of a technique for a research and development program evaluation. Operations Research 7, 646-669.
36. May, J. H., Strum, D. P., Vargas, L. G., 2000. Fitting the lognormal distribution to surgical procedure times. Decision Sciences 31, 129-148.
37. Mazmanyan, L., Ohanyan, V., Trietsch, D., 2008. The Lognormal Central Limit Theorem for Positive Random Variables (Working Paper; reproduced within Baker and Trietsch 2010b).
38. Mohan, S., Gopalakrishnan, M., Balasubramanian, H., Chandrashekar, A., 2007. A lognormal approximation of activity duration in PERT using two time estimates. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58, 827-831.
39. Parkinson, C. N., 1957. Parkinson's Law and Other Studies in Administration. Houghton-Mifflin.
40. Pittman, P. H., 1994. Project management: A more effective methodology for the planning & control of projects, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.
41. Premachandra, I. M., 2001. An approximation of the activity duration distribution in PERT. Computers and Operations Research 28, 443-452.
42. Premachandra, I. M., Gonzales, L., 1996. A simulation model solved the problem of scheduling drilling rigs at clyde dam. Interfaces 26(2), 80-91.
43. Robb, D. J., 1992. Scheduling in a management context: Stochastic tasks and non-regular reward functions, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of Management. University of Calgary.
44. Robb, D. J., Silver, E. A., 1993. Single-processor scheduling with stochastic tasks and non-regular performance measures. Decision Sciences 24(6), 1085-1108.
45. Royston, P., 1993. A toolkit for testing for non-normality in complete and censored samples. The Statistician 42, 37-43
46. See also Corrigendum (1999) The Statistician, 48, Part I, 158.
47. Schonberger, R. J., 1981. Why projects are "always" late: A rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces 11, 66-70.
48. Shapiro, S. S., Francia, R. S., 1972. An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67, 215-216.
49. Shapiro, S. S., Wilk, M. B., 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 65, 591-611.
50. Shtub, A., Bard, J. F., Globerson, S., 2005. Project Management: Processes, second ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
51. Soroush, H. M., Fredendall, L. D., 1994. The stochastic single machine scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness costs. European Journal of Operational Research 77, 287-302.
52. Strum, D. P., Sampson, A. R., May, J. H., Vargas, L. G., 2000. Surgeon and type of anesthesia predict variability in surgical procedure times. Anesthesiology 92, 1454-1466.
53. Trietsch, D., 2005. Why a critical path by any other name would smell less sweet: Towards a holistic approach to PERT/CPM. Project Management Journal 36(1), 27-36.
54. Trietsch, D., 2006. Optimal feeding buffers for projects or batch supply chains by an exact generalization of the newsvendor model. International Journal of Production Research 44, 627-637.
55. Trietsch, D., Baker, K. R., 2008. Minimizing the number of tardy jobs with stochastically-ordered processing times. Journal of Scheduling 11, 71-73.
56. Trietsch, D., Mazmanyan, L., Gevorgyan, L., Baker, K. R., 2010. A New Stochastic Engine for PERT, Working paper. .
57. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124-1131.
58. Van de Vonder, S., Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., 2008. Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 189, 723-733.
59. Verrill, S., Johnson, A., 1988. Tables and large-sample distribution theory for censored-data correlation statistics for testing normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 1192-1197.
60. Wiesemann, W., Kuhn, D., Rustem, B., 2010. Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 202, 356-367.
61. Wollmer, R. D., 1985. Critical path planning under uncertainty. Mathematical Programming 25, 164-171.
62. Woolsey, R. E., 1992. The fifth column: The PERT that never was or data collection as an optimizer. Interfaces 22, 112-114.