Phylogenetic relationships of extant esocid species (Teleostei: Salmoniformes) based on morphological and molecular characters

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 4, 2004, Pages 743-757

  Grande, Terry ^a   Laten, Howard ^a   López, J Andrés ^b  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; TELEOST;

ESOCIDAE; ESOX; ESOX LUCIUS; ESOX REICHERTI; ESOX REICHERTII; SALMONIFORMES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 11144328145     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CG-04-007R1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
2. CASSELMAN, J. M., E. J. CROSSMAN, P. E. IHSSEN, J. D. REIST, AND H. E. BOOKE. 1986. Identification of Muskellunge Northern Pike, and their hybrids. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Pub. 15:14-46.
3. CHANG, M. M., AND J. J. ZHOU. 2002. First discovery of fossil pike (Esox, Pices, Teleostei) from China. Vert. Palasiatica 4:81-96.
4. CROSSMAN, E. J. 1960. Variation in number and asymmetry in branchiostegal rays in the family Esocidae. Can. J. Zool. 38:363-375.
5. _. 1966. A taxonomic study of Esox americanus and its subspecies in eastern North America. Copeia 1966:1-20.
6. _. 1978. Taxonomy and distribution of North American esocids. Am. Fish. Soc. Sp. Pub. 11:13-26.
7. _, AND K. BUSS. 1965. Hybridization in the family Esocidae. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 22:1261-1292.
8. _, AND J. M. CASSELMAN. 1969. Identification of northern pike and muskellunge from axial skeletons, scales and epipleurals. Ibid. 26:175-178.
9. DINGERKUS, G., AND L. D. UHLER. 1977. Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. J. Stain Tech. 52:229-232.
10. FINK, W. L. 1981. Ontogeny and phylogeny of tooth attachment modes in actinopterygian fishes. J. Morph. 167:167-184.
11. GRANDE, L. 1999. The first Esox (Esocidae: Teleostei) from the Eocene Green River Formation, and a brief review of esocid fishes. J. Vert. Paleo. 19:271-292.
12. _, AND W. E. BEMIS. 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Soc. Vert. Paleo. Mem. 4. Suppl. J. Vert. Paleo. 18:1-690.
13. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
14. HUBBS, C. L., AND K. F. LAGLER. 1949. Fishes of the Great Lakes region. Cranbook Press, Bloomfield Hills, MI.
15. JOHNSON, G. D., AND C. PATTERSON. 1996. Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes, p. 251-332. In: Interrelationships of fishes. M. L. J. Stiassny, R. L. Parenti, and G. D. Johnson (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
16. JORDAN, D. S., AND B. W. EVERMANN. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America, pt. 1. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus. 47:1-1240.
17. LEVITON, A. E., R. H. GIBBS JR., E. HEAL, AND C. E. DAWSON. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology. Part 1. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985:8902-832.
18. LÓPEZ, J. A., W.-J. CHEN, AND G. ORTI. 2004. Esociform phylogeny. Ibid. 2004:449-464.
19. MAES, G. E., J. K. J. VAN HOUDT, D. DE CHARLEROY, AND F. A. M. VOLCKAERT. 2003. Indications for a recent Holarctic expansion of pike based on a preliminary study of mtDNA variation. 2003. J. Fish Biol. 63:254-259.
20. NELSON, G. 1972. Cephalic sensory canals, pitlines and the classification of esocoid fishes, with notes on galaxiids and other teleosts. Am. Mus. Novit. 2492:1-49.
21. NIXON, K., AND J. CARPENTER. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics. 9:413-426.
22. PATTERSON, C., AND G. D. JOHNSON. 1995. The intermuscular bones and ligaments of teleostean fishes. Smith. Contr. Zool. 559:1-83.
23. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
24. RÁB, P., AND E. J. CROSSMAN. 1994. Chromosomal NOR phenotypes in North American pikes and pickerels, genus Esox, with notes on the Umbridae of the pikes in North American fresh waters. J. Paleo. 66:839-846. (Euteleostei: Esocae). Can. J. Zool. 72:1951-1956.
25. RÁB, P., AND E. J. CROSSMAN. 1994. Chromosomal NOR phenotypes in North American pikes and pickerels, genus Esox, with notes on the Umbridae of the pikes in North American fresh waters. J. Paleo. 66:839-846. (Euteleostei: Esocae). Can. J. Zool. 72:1951-1956.
26. SYTCHEVSKAYA, E. K. 1976. The fossil esocoid fishes of the USSR and Mongolia. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta, Akademiya Nauk USSR 156:1-116.
27. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interlace: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality anal-ysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 25:4876-82.
28. WHEELER, A. 1958. The Gronovious fish collection: a catalogue and historical account. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.). Ser VI:209.
29. WILSON, M. V. H., AND P. VEILLEUX. 1982. Comparative osteology and relationships of Umbridae (Pisces: Salmoniformes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 76:321-325.
30. _, D. B. BRINKMAN, AND A. G. NEUMAN. 1992. Cretaceous Esocoidei (Teleostei): early radiation of pikes in North American fresh waters J. Paleo. 66:839-846.