A molecular and morphological perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the otophysan fishes

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 120-133

  Dimmick, Walter Wheaton ^a,b   Larson, Allan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACIFORMES; CYPRINIFORMES; GONORYNCHIFORMES; GYMNOTOIDEI; OTOPHYSI; PISCES;

DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; FISH; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; FISHES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0030207538     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0064     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson, S., De Bruijn, M. H. L., Coulson, A. R., Eperon, I. C., Sanger, F., and Young, I. G. (1982). Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA. Conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Biol. 156: 683-717.
2. Briggs, J. C. (1979). Ostariophysan zoogeography: An alternate hypothesis. Copeia 1979: 111-118.
3. Brooks, D. R., and McLennan, D. A. (1991). "Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology," Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
4. Bullock, T. H., and Heiligenberg, W. (1986). "Electroreception," Wiley, New York.
5. Dimmick, W. W. (1988). Ultrastructure of North American cyprinid maxillary barbels. Copeia 1988: 72-80.
6. Donoghue, M. J. (1989). Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
7. Finger, T. E., Bell, C. C., and Carr, C. E. (1986). Comparisons among electroreceptive teleosts. Why are electrosensory systems so similar? In "Electroreception" (T. H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg, Eds.), pp. 465-481, Wiley, New York.
8. Fink, S. V., and Fink, W. (1981). Interrelationships of the ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. London 72: 297-353.
9. Fink, S. V., Greenwood, P. H., and Fink, W. L. (1984). A critique on recent work on fossil ostariophysan fishes. Copeia 1984: 1033-1041.
10. Gayet, M. (1982a). Cypriniforme ou Gonorynchiforme? Ramallichthys, nouveau genre du Cénomanien inférieur de Ramallah (Monts de Judée). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 295: 405-407.
11. Gayet, M. (1982b). Considération sur la phylogénie et la paléobiogéographie des Ostariophysaires. Geobios. Mem. 6: 39-52.
12. Gayet, M. (1986). About ostariophysian fishes: A reply to S. V. Fink, P. H. Greenwood and W. L. Fink's criticisms. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. sect. C 3: 393-409.
13. Greenwood, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H., and Meyers, G. S. (1966). Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 131: 339-456.
14. Hillis, D. M., and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (1992). Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83: 189-195.
15. Hillis, D. M., Larson, A., Davis, S. K., and Zimmer, E. A. (1990). Nucleic acids III: Sequencing. In "Molecular Systematics" (D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, Eds.), pp. 318-370, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
16. Kluge, A. J. (1989). A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38: 7-25.
17. Larson, A. (1991a). A molecular perspective on the evolutionary relationships of the salamander families. Evol. Biol. 25: 211-277.
18. Larson, A. (1991b). Evolutionary analysis of length variable sequences: Divergent domains of ribosomal RNA. In "Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequence Data" (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, Eds.), pp. 221-248, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
19. Larson, A. (1994). The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. In "Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications" (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, Eds.), pp. 371-390, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
20. Larson, A., and Wilson, A. C. (1989). Patterns of ribosomal RNA evolution in salamanders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6: 131-154.
21. Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. (1992). "MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3," Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
22. Maniatis, T., Fristch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982). "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual," Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
23. Mickevich, M. F., and Farris, J. S. (1981). The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30: 351-370.
24. Novacek, M. J., and Marshall, L. G. (1976). Early biogeographic history of ostariophysan fishes. Copeia 1976: 1-12.
25. Regan, C. T. (1911a). The classification of teleostean fishes of the order Ostariophysi-1. Cyprinoidea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8: 13-32.
26. Regan, C. T. (1911b). The classification of teleostean fishes of the order Ostariophysi-2. Siluroidea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8: 553-537.
27. Roberts, T. (1972). Ecology of fishes in the Amazon and Congo river basin. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 143: 117-147.
28. Roberts, T. (1973). Interrelationships of ostariophysans. In "Interrelationships of fishes" (P. H. Greenwood, R. S. Miles, and C. Patterson, Eds.), Supplement No. 1., Zool. J. Linnean Soc. Vol. 53, pp. 373-395, Academic Press, San Diego.
29. Ronquist, F. (1994). Ancestral areas and parsimony. Syst. Biol. 43: 267-274.
30. Rosen, D. E., and Greenwood, P. H. (1970). Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationships of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. Am. Mus. Novit. 2428: 1-25.
31. Salim, M., and Maden, B. E. H. (1981). Nucleotide sequence of Xenopus laevis 18S ribosomal RNA inferred from gene sequence. Nature 291: 205-208.
32. Swofford, D. L. (1990). "Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.0," Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
33. Swofford, D. L. (1991). When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In "Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences" (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, Eds.), pp. 295-333, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
34. Templeton, A. R. (1983). Phylogenetic inference from restriction site cleavage maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
35. Ware, V. C., Tague, B. W., Clark, C. G., Gourse, R. L., Brand, R. C., and Gerbi, S. A. (1983). Sequence analysis of 28S ribosomal DNA from the amphibian Xenopus laevis. Nucleic Acids Res. 11: 7795-7817.