Complete genome sequence of Clostridium clariflavum DSM 19732

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 104-115

  Izquierdo, Javier A ^a,b,e   Goodwin, Lynne ^c   Davenport, Karen W ^c   Teshima, Hazuki ^c   Bruce, David ^c   Detter, Chris ^c   Tapia, Roxanne ^c   Han, Shunsheng ^c   Land, Miriam ^b,d   Hauser, Loren ^b,d   Jeffries, Cynthia D ^b,d   Han, James ^d   Pitluck, Sam ^d   Nolan, Matt ^d   Chen, Amy ^d   Huntemann, Marcel ^d   Mavromatis, Konstantinos ^d   Mikhailova, Natalia ^d   Liolios, Konstantinos ^d   Woyke, Tanja ^d   Lynd, Lee R ^a,b   more..

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic; Bioenergy; Biotechnology; Cel lulolytic; Cellulosome; Lignocellulose utilization; Thermophilic

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA; CELLULOSOME; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; PYRUVIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CHEMOTAXONOMY; CLOSTRIDIUM; CLOSTRIDIUM CLARIFLAVUM; DNA ISOLATION; ENZYME DEGRADATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC CODE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPEN READING FRAME; PHYLOGENY;

CLOSTRIDIACEAE; CLOSTRIDIUM; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM;

EID: 84859139303     PISSN: 19443277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2535732     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Lynd LR, Weimer P, Van Zyl W, Pretorius I. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002; 66:506-577.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
2. Shiratori H, Sasaya K, Ohiwa H, Ikeno H, Ayame S, Kataoka N, Miya A, Beppu T, Ueda K. Clostrid-ium clariflavum sp. nov. and Clostridium caenicola sp. nov., moderately thermophilic, cellulose-/cellobiose-digesting bacteria isolated from methanogenic sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1764-1770.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.003483-0
3. Izquierdo JA, Sizova MV, Lynd LR. Diversity of bacteria and glycosyl hydrolase family 48 Genes in cellulolytic consortia enriched from thermophilic biocompost. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:3545-3553.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02689-09
4. Sizova MV, Izquierdo JA, Panikov NS, Lynd LR. Cellulose- and xylan-degrading thermophilic anaerobic bacteria from biocompost. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:2282-2291.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01219-10
5. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:1073-1095.PubMed
6. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol 2010; 17:337-354.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2009.0179
7. Shiratori H, Ikeno H, Ayame S, Kataoka N, Miya A, Hosono K, Beppu T, Ueda K. Isolation and characterization of a new Clostridium sp. that performs effective cellulosic waste digestion in a thermophilic methanogenic bioreactor. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:3702-3709.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.5.3702-3709.2006
8. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360
9. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the do-mains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576
10. Gibbons N, Murray R. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1
11. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The road map to the manu-al. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169.
12. Murray RGE. The higher taxa, or, a place for everything...? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31-34.
13. Rainey FA. "Class II. Clostridia class nov." In: P. De Vos, G.M. Garrity, D. Jones, N.R. Krieg, W. Ludwig, F.A. Rainey, K.H. Schleifer, and W.B. Whitman (eds): Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 3 (The Firmicutes), Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York (2009) p. 736.
14. Validation List 132. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not valid-ly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
15. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1-692.
16. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Ap-proved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225
17. Pribram E. Klassification der Schizomyceten. F. Deuticke, Leipzig, (1933) pp. 1-143.
18. Prazmowski A. Untersuchung über die entwickelungsgeschichte und fermentwirking einiger bakterienarten. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Leipzig, Germany, 1880, p. 366-371.
19. Smith LDS, Hobbs G. Genus III. Clostridium Prazmowski 1880, 23. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 551-572.
20. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556
21. Liolios K, Chen IMA, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346-D354.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp848
22. JGI standard operating procedure. http://my.jgi.doe.gov/general/protocols
23. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 2004; 5:433-438.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14622416.5.4.433
24. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005; 437:376-380.PubMed
25. DOE Joint Genome Institute. http://www.jgi.doe.gov
26. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821-829.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.074492.107
27. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998; 8:175-185.PubMed
28. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated se-quencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998; 8:186-194.PubMed
29. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 1998; 8:195-202.PubMed
30. Han C, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In: Arabnia HR, Valafar J, editors. Proceedings of the 2006 inter-national Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology: CSREA Press; 2006. p 141-146
31. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. Pub-Med http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119
32. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455-457.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1457
33. Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, Chen IMA, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, et al. The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D528-D533.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm846
34. Dam P, Kataeva I, Yang SJ, Zhou F, Yin Y, Chou W, Poole FL, Westpheling J, Hettich R, Giannone R, et al. Insights into plant biomass conversion from the genome of the anaerobic thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor bescii DSM 6725. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:3240-3254.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1281
35. VanFossen AL, Ozdemir I, Zelin SL, Kelly RM. Glycoside hydrolase inventory drives plant polysaccharide deconstruction by the extremely thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108:1559-1569.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23093
36. Berger E, Zhang D, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH. Two noncellulosomal cellulases of Clostridium thermocellum, Cel9I and Cel48Y, hydrolyse crystalline cellulose synergistically. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007; 268:194-201.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00583.x
37. Raman B, Pan C, Hurst G, Rodriguez M, Jr., McKeown C, Lankford P, Samatova N, Mielenz J. Impact of pretreated Switchgrass and biomass carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 cellulosome composition: a quantitative proteomic analysis. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:e5271.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005271
38. Gold ND, Martin VJJ. Global view of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:6787-6795.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00882-07
39. Kahel-Raifer H, Jindou S, Bahari L, Nataf Y, Shoham Y, Bayer EA, Borovok I, Lamed R. The unique set of putative membrane-associated antisigma factors in Clostridium thermocellum suggests a novel extracellular carbohydrate-sensing mechanism involved in gene regulation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2010; 308:84-93.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01997.x
40. Shoham Y, Lamed R, Bayer E. The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. Trends Microbiol 1999; 7:275-281.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01533-4
41. Doi RH, Kosugi A. Cellulosomes: plant-cell-wall-degrading enzyme complexes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:541-551.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro925
42. Xu Q, Barak Y, Kenig R, Shoham Y, Bayer E, La-med R. A novel Acetivibrio cellulolyticus anchoring scaffoldin that bears divergent cohesins. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:5782-5789.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.186.17.5782-5789.2004
43. Xu Q, Gao W, Ding S, Kenig R, Shoham Y, Bayer E, Lamed R. The cellulosome system of Acetivibrio cellulolytiscus includes a novel type of adaptor protein and a cell surface anchoring protein. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:4548-4557.PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.15.4548-4557.2003