A combined approach in characterization of an effective w/o hand cream: The influence of emollient on textural, sensorial and in vivo skin performance

International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 140-149

  Lukic, M ^a   Jaksic, I ^a   Krstonosic, V ^b   Cekic, N ^c,d   Savic, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^c DCP Hemigal ^*  (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NI   (Serbia)

Author keywords

dry skin; efficacy; rheology; sensory characteristics; textural parameters

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; EMOLLIENT AGENT; OIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CREAM; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG SCREENING; DRY SKIN; FEMALE; FLOW KINETICS; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; SENSORY EVALUATION; SKIN SENSATION; SKIN TEXTURE; VISCOELASTICITY;

ADULT; EMOLLIENTS; EMULSIONS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; RHEOLOGY; SKIN DISEASES;

EID: 84859110067     PISSN: 01425463     EISSN: 14682494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2011.00693.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wortel, V.A.L., and, Wiechers, J.W., Skin sensory performance of individual personal care ingredients and marketed personal care products. Food Qual. Prefer. 11, 121-127 (2000).
2. Almeida, I.F., Gaio, A.R., and, Bahia, M.F., Hedonic and descriptive skinfeel analysis of two oleogels: comparison with other topical formulations. J. Sens. Stud. 23, 92-113 (2008). (Pubitemid 351197255)
3. Husson, F., Le, S., and, Pages, J.F., Variability of the representation of the variables resulting from PCA in the case of a conventional sensory profile. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 933-937 (2007). (Pubitemid 47010300)
4. Parente, M.E., Ares, G., and, Manzoni, A.V., Application of two consumer profiling techniques to cosmetic emulsions. J. Sens. Stud. 25, 685-705 (2010).
5. Koehl, L., Zeng, X., Zhou, B., and, Ding, Y., Intelligent sensory evaluation: concepts, implementations and applications. Math. Comput. Simul. 77, 522-530 (2008).
6. Nakano, K., Horiuchi, K., Soneda, T., Kashimoto, A., Tsuchiya, R., and, Yokoyama, M., A neural network approach to predict tactile comfort of applying cosmetic foundation. Tribol. Int. 43, 1978-1990 (2010).
7. Zeng, X., Ruan, D., and, Koehl, L., Intelligent sensory evaluation: concepts, implementations and applications. Math. Comput. Simul. 77, 443-452 (2008).
8. Barnes, H.A., Rheology of emulsions-a review. Colloids Surf. A 91, 89-95 (1994).
9. Trapp, M., Is there room for improvement in the emollients for adjuvant therapy? J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 21, 14-18 (2007). (Pubitemid 47315482)
10. Brummer, S., and, Godersky, S., Rheological studies to objectify sensations occurring when cosmetic emulsions are applied to the skin. Colloids Surf. A 152, 89-94 (1999). (Pubitemid 29236198)
11. Park, E.K., and, Song, K.W., Rheological evaluation of petroleum jelly as a base material in ointment and cream formulations: steady shear flow behavior. Arch. Pharm. Res. 33, 141-150 (2010).
12. Lemaitre-Aghazarian, V., Piccerele, P., Reynier, J.P., Joachim, S., Phan-Tan-Lun, R., and, Sergent, M., Textural optimization of water-in-oil emulsions. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 9, 125-134 (2004).
13. Masmoudi, H., Ledreane, Y., Piccerelle, P., and, Kister, J., The evaluation of cosmetic and pharmaceutical emulsions aging process using classical techniques and a new method: FTIR. Int. J. Pharm. 289, 117-131 (2009). (Pubitemid 40093547)
14. Wiechers, J.W., and, Chandler, M., (Re)Formulating within REACh with formulating from first principles. Cosmet. Toiletries 122, 63-72 (2007).
15. Parente, M.E., Gambaro, A., and, Ares, G., Sensory characterization of emollients. J. Sens. Stud. 23, 149-161 (2008). (Pubitemid 351483175)
16. Carey, J.M., Moran, B., Shuster, F., and, Vondruska, B., A new formulators tool for customizing sensory properties. Cosmet. Toiletries 123, 57-66 (2008).
17. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Cosmetic Products, 2nd edn. The European Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (COLIPA), Brussel (2001).
18. Leitlinien für die Bewertung der Wirksamkeit von kosmetischen Mitteln, Hrsg. IKW (Industrieverband für Körperpflege und Waschmittel), Frankfurt/Main (2001)
19. Berardesca, E., EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res. Technol. 3, 126-132 (1997). (Pubitemid 27267624)
20. Pons-Guiraud, A., Dry skin in dermatology: a complex physiopathology. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 21, 1-4 (2007). (Pubitemid 47308233)
21. Byrne, A.J., Bioengineering and subjective approaches to the clinical evaluation of dry skin. J. Cosmet. Sci. 32, 410-421 (2010).
22. Berry, N., Charmeil, C., Goujon, C., Silvy, A., Girard, P., Corcuff, P., and, Montastier, C., A clinical, biometrological and ultrastructural study of xerotic skin. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 21, 241-252 (1999). (Pubitemid 29378057)
23. Moddaresi, M., Tamburic, S., Wiliams, S., Jones, S.A., Zhao, Y., and, Brown, M.B., Effects of lipid nanocarriers on the performance of topical vehicles in vivo. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 8, 136-143 (2009).
24. ASTM E 1490-03. Standard practice for descriptive skinfeel of creams and lotions. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2003).
25. Briceno, M.I., Rheology of suspensions and emulsions. In: Pharmaceutical Emulsions and Suspensions, 2nd Edn (, Niellond, F., ed.), pp. 557-607. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York (2000).
26. Parente, M.E., Gambaro, A., and, Solana, G., Study of sensory properties of emollients used in cosmetics and their correlation with physicochemical properties. J. Cosmet. Sci. 56, 175-182 (2005). (Pubitemid 41116941)
27. Barnes, H.A., The yield stress-a review or 'panta rei'- everything flows. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 81, 133-178 (1999).
28. Klicast, D., and, Clegg, S., Sensory perception of creaminess and its relationship with food structure. Food Qual. Prefer. 13, 609-623 (2002). (Pubitemid 35221428)
29. Wang, S., Kislalioglu, M.S., and, Breue, M., The effect of rheological properties of experimental moisturizing creams/lotions on their efficacy and perceptual attributes. J. Cosmet. Sci. 21, 167-188 (1999). (Pubitemid 29308481)