From Master to Games-master: Managing Disequilibrium and Scaffolding in Simulation-based Learning

Digital Games and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 226-251

  Barton, Karen ^a   McKellar, Patricia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UK Centre for Legal Education   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859094223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J. and Adams, C. (1998). Computer Games as a Learning Resource, Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 98 & ED-TELECOM 98. In T. Ottmann and I. Tomek, eds. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, pp. 50–55.
2. Barab, S., Arici, A. and Jackson, C. (1995). Eat Your Vegetables and Do Your Homework: a designbased investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning, Educational Technology, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 15–21.
3. Barab, S., Dodge, T. and Ingram-Goble, A. (2008). Conceptual play spaces and transactive engagement: a 21st century pedagogy, http://inkido.indiana.edu/research/onlinemanu/papers/acad_play.pdf Accessed 8 October 2008).
4. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R. and Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns, ETR&D, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 86–107.
5. Barton, K. and Maharg, P. (2007). E-simulations in the wild: interdisciplinary research, design and implementation of simulation environments in legal education, in D. Gibson, C. Aldrich and M. Prensky, eds. Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks, Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
6. Barton, K. and McKellar, P. (1998). The Virtual Court Action: procedural facilitation in law, ALT-J, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 87–94.
7. Barton, K. and McKellar, P. (2007). Transactional Learning: Ardcalloch Sheriff Court is open for business, Journal of Information, Law and Technology, No.1, Special Issue on Law Education and Technology. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2007_1/barton_mckellar. Accessed 25.4.10.
8. Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Leng, P. H. and Staniford G. (1998). A Computer supported environment for the teaching of legal argument, Journal of Law and Information Technology, No. 3 http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1998_3/bench.
9. Blackie, J. and Maharg, P. (1998). The Delict Game, Proceedings of the Thirteenth BILETA Conference.
10. Bradlow, D. and Finkelstein, J. G. (2007). Training law students to be international transactional lawyers – using and extended simulation to educate law students about business transactions. Pepperdine Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law, Vol. 1, pp. 67–87.
11. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 32–42.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
13. Dixon, R. J. (2002). Toward greater authenticity: a case for divergent simulations, Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 360–66.
14. Ecke, P. (1999). Trial for Pinchetot: a simulation/game on justice and human rights. Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 231–37.
15. Gee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
16. Hollins, E. R. (1980). Simulation review: trial lawyer, the jurisprudence game (1977). Simulation & Games, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 378–79.
17. Jung, C. S. Y. and Levitin, H. (2002). Using a simulation in an ESL classroom: a descriptive analysis. Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 367–75.
18. Kirriemuir, J. and McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature Review in Games and Learning. Futurelab series, Bristol: Futurelab.
19. Knerr, C. R. and Sommerman, A. B. (2000). Undergraduate Appellate Simulation in American Colleges and Universities. Report Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, Galveston, Texas.
20. Maharg, P. (2004). Virtual communities on the web: transactional learning and teaching. In Vedder, A., ed. Aan het Werk met ICT in het Academisch Onderwijs – RechtenOnline, Rotterdam: Wolf Legal Publishers.
21. Maharg, P. (2007). Transforming Legal Education: Learning and Teaching the Law in the Early Twenty-first Century. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
22. Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, No. 4, pp. 333–69.
23. Martin, D. S. (1979). Five simulation games in the social sciences. Simulation & Games, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 331–49.
24. Migdal S. and Cartwright M. (1997). Pure electronic delivery of law modules – dream or reality? Journal of Information Law and Technology (JILT) 1997 (2). Available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1997_2/migdal/. Last accessed 4.5.10.
25. Migdal, S. and Cartwright, M. (1998). Information technology in the legal curriculum – reaction and realities. Proceedings of the 13th Annual BILETA Conference (Dublin).
26. Moodie, P. (1997). Law courseware and Iolis: assessing the present and constructing the future. The Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT), 1997 (1). Available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1997_1/moodie/. Last accessed 4.5.10.
27. Paliwala, A. (1998). Co-operative development of CAL materials: a case study of IOLIS, The Journal of Information Law and Technology (JILT) 1998 (3). Available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1998_3/paliwala/. Last accessed 4.5.10.
28. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Games-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Rachid, M. and Knerr, C. R. (2000). A brief history of Moot Court: Britain and U.S. Report Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, Galveston, Texas.
30. Ringel, L. S. (2004). Designing a Moot Court; What to Do, What Not to Do, and Suggestions for How to Do It. Political Science and Politics, Vol. 37, pp. 459–65.
31. Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D. and Marquis, J. S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: a systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 247–56.
32. Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. International Journal of Computer Game Research, Vol. 2, No. 1. Available at http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/. Last accessed 4.5.10.
33. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34. Van Eck, R. (2007). Building artificially intelligent learning games. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich and M. Prensky, eds. Games and Simulation in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks, Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Publishing.
35. Widdison, R. (1995). Law courseware: Big Bang or Damp Squib? Web Journal of Current Legal Issues No. 4. Available at http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/articles4/widdis4.html. Last accessed 4.5.10.
36. Widdison, R. and Schulte, R. (1998). Quarts into Pint Pots? Electronic law tutorials revisited. Journal of Information, Law and Technology, No. 1. Available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1998_1/widdison1/. Last accessed 4.5.10.