Toward greater authenticity: A case for divergent simulations

Simulation and Gaming

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 360-366

  Dixon, Robin J ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergent thinking; Employee rights; Employer responsibility; Heirs; Inheritance; Jury simulation; Land use; Legal game; Simple simulations; Trial; Zoning policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049135570     PISSN: 10468781     EISSN: 1552826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104687810203300310     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Brown, H. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Christopher, E., & Smith, L. (1990). Shaping the content of simulation/games. In D. Crookall & R. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 47-54). New York: Newbury House.
3. Crookall, D., & Oxford, R. (1990). Linking language learning and simulation/gaming. In D. Crookall & R. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 3-31). New York: Newbury House.
4. Cunningham, C. (1995). Evolution of a Bushfire simulation/game. In D. Crookall & K. Arai (Eds.), Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures (pp. 20-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709-727.