Bridging the gap between theory and policy

Political Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 593-603

  Nye Jr , Joseph S ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foreign policy; In and outers; Power; Practice; Research; Theory; Think tanks; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 47649108653     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. George, A. L. (1993). Bridging the gap: Theory and practice in foreign policy. Washington : United States Institute of Peace Press.
2. Haass, R. N. (2002). Think tanks and U.S. foreign policy: A policymaker's perspective. US Foreign Policy Agenda, 7, 5 8.
3. Hill, C. (1994). Academic international relations: The siren song of policy relevance. In C. Hill P. Beshoff (Eds Two worlds of international relations: Academics, practitioners and the trade in ideas (pp. 3 28). London : Routledge.
4. Hoffmann, S. (2006). Chaos and violence: What globalization, failed states, and terrorism mean for U.S. foreign policy. Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.
5. Hurrell, A. (2004). America and the world: Issues in the teaching of U.S. foreign policy. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (1 101 111.
6. Jentleson, B. (2002). The need for praxis: Bringing policy relevance back in. International Security, 26, 169 83.
7. Lepgold, J. Nincic, M. (2001). Beyond the ivory tower: International relations theory and the issue of policy relevance. New York : Columbia University Press.
8. Lieberthal, K. (2006). Initiatives to bridge the gap. Asia Policy, 1, 7 15.
9. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York : Norton.
10. Neustadt, R. E. May, E. R. (1986). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision-makers. New York : Free Press.
11. Newsom, D. (1995-96). Foreign policy and academia. Foreign Policy, 101, 52 67.
12. Nitze, P. H. (1993). Tension between opposites: Reflections on the practice and theory of politics. New York : Scribner.
13. Nye, J. S. (1989). Studying world politics. In J. Kruzel J. N. Rosenau (Eds Journeys through world politics: Autobiographical reflections of thirty-four academic travelers (pp. 199 212). Lexington, MA : Lexington Books.
14. Peterson, S., Tierney, M. J. Maliniak, D. (2005). Inside the ivory tower. Foreign Policy, 151, 58 64.
15. Putnam, R. D. (2003). APSA presidential address: The public role of political science. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 249 55.
16. Sigelman, L. (2006). The coevolution of American political science and the American Political Science Review. American Political Science Review, 100 (4 463 478.
17. Siverson, R. M. (2000). A glass half-full? No, but perhaps a glass filling: The contributions of international politics research to policy. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33, 59 64.
18. Vogel, E. (2006). Some reflections on policy and academics. Asia Policy, 1, 31 4.
19. Walt, S. M. (2005). The relationship between theory and policy in international relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 23 48.
20. Wilson III., E. J. (2000). How social science can help policymakers: The relevance of theory. In M. Nincic J. Lepgold (Eds Being useful: Policy relevance and international relations theory (pp. 109 28). Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
21. Wilson III., E. J. (2007). Is there really a scholar-practitioner gap? An institutional analysis. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40, 147 51.