Variability in isopter position and fatigue during semi-automated kinetic perimetry

Ophthalmologica

Volumn 227, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 166-172

  Nowomiejska, Katarzyna ^a,b   Brzozowska, Agnieszka ^b   Zarnowski, Tomasz ^b   Rejdak, Robert ^a,b,c   Weleber, Richard G ^d   Schiefer, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LUBLIN   (Poland)

^c MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fatigue effect; Isopter; Reaction time; Semi automated kinetic perimetry; Variability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; RELIABILITY; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SEMI AUTOMATED KINETIC PERIMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASTHENOPIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REACTION TIME; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859002049     PISSN: 00303755     EISSN: 14230267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000333821     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aspinall PA: Some methodological problems in testing visual function. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 1974; 13: 2-7.
2. Flammer J, Drance SM, Fankhauser F, Augustiny L: Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 102: 876-879.
3. Heijl A, Drance SM: Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1983; 67: 512-516. (Pubitemid 13028252)
4. Wall M, Johnson CA, Kutzko KE, Nguyen R, Brito C, Keltner JL: Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 53-61. (Pubitemid 28098894)
5. Chauhan BC, House PH: Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 79-83.
6. Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH: Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 974-979.
7. Bengtsson B, Hellgren KJ, Agardh E: Testretest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients. Acta Ophthalmol 2008; 86: 170-176.
8. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC: Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequencydoubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2451-2457. (Pubitemid 43119493)
9. Lamparter J, Schulze A, Schuff AC, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM: Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 1057-1064.
10. Drance SM, Berry V, Hughes A: Studies in the reproducibility of visual field areas in normal and glaucomatous subjects. Can J Ophthalmol 1966; 1: 14-23.
11. Gramer E, Proll M, Krieglstein GK: Reproducibility of central visual field testing using kinetic or computerized static perimetry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1980; 176: 374-384. (Pubitemid 10112751)
12. Parrish RK 2nd, Schiffman J, Anderson DR: A static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1497-1502. (Pubitemid 14048639)
13. Zingirian M, Gandolfo E, Capris P, Corallo : Comparison between static and kinetic threshold fluctuation determined by automated perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1985; 42: 49-54.
14. Capris P, Gandolfo E, Zingirian M, Orciuolo M, Rovida S: Kinetic short-term fluctuations in patients with glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987; 49: 117-121.
15. Weleber RG, Tobler WR: Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 101: 461-468. (Pubitemid 16111098)
16. Greve EL: Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma: The two phases of perimetry. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1973; 36: 1-355.
17. Goldmann H: Grundlagen exakter Perimetrie. Ophthalmologica 1945; 109: 57-70.
18. Kwon YH, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS: Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132: 47-56. (Pubitemid 32600889)
19. Fishman GA, Bozbeyoglu S, Massof RW, Kimberling W: Natural course of visual field loss in patients with type 2 Usher syndrome. Retina 2007; 27: 601-608. (Pubitemid 46905152)
20. Nakajima H, Hosokawa T, Sugino M, Kimura F, Sugasawa J, Hanafusa T, Takahashi T: Visual field defects of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica compared with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2010; 18: 10-45.
21. Schiefer U, Witte A: Perimetrisches Untersuchungsverfahren: autokinetische Perimetrie II. Deutsches Patentamt München. Az 196 21 960 41-18; 1996
22. Schiefer U, Schiller J, Dietrich TJ, Besch D, Paetzold J: Evaluation of adVanced visual field loss with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry. Docum Ophthalmol Proc Ser 2001; 68: 131-136.
23. Nowomiejska K, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Zagorski Z, Kardon R, Schiefer U: RT during semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with adVanced visual field loss. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 88: 65-69.
24. Vonthein R, Rauscher S, Paetzold J, Nowomiejska K, Krapp E, Hermann A, Sadowski B, Chaumette C, Wild J, Schiefer U: The normal age-corrected and RT-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry. Ophthalmology 2007; 14: 1065-1072.
25. Nowomiejska K, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Zagorski Z, Kardon R, Schiefer U: Comparison between semi-automated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in adVanced visual field loss. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1343-1354. (Pubitemid 41074621)
26. Nevalainen J, Paetzold J, Krapp E, Vonthein R, Johnson CA, Schiefer U: The use of semiautomated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor adVanced glaucomatous visual field loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 246: 1331-1339.
27. Aulhorn E, Karmeyer H: Frequency distribution in early glaucomatous visual field loss. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1977; 40: 17-83.
28. Johnson CA, Keltner JL: Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 73-75. (Pubitemid 17207565)
29. Wabbels BK, Kolling G: Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 168-173. (Pubitemid 32173052)
30. Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM: Perimetrie. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1992.
31. Ando S, Kida N, Oda S: Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 747-751.
32. Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA: Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry? Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 1043-1048.
33. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill EC: Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 268-280 (Pubitemid 24046851)
34. Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA: Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry? Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 1043-1048.
35. Wild, JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA: Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 206-215. (Pubitemid 43170769)
36. Wildberger H, Robert Y: Visual fatigue during prolonged visual field testing in optic neuropathies. Neuro-Ophthalmology 1988; 8: 167-174.
37. Langerhorst CT, Van Den Berg TJ, Veldman E, Greve EL: Population study of global and local fatigue with prolonged threshold testing in automated perimetry. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987; 49: 657-662.
38. Wall M, Maw RJ, Stanek KE, Chauhan BC: The psychometric function and RTs of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 878-885. (Pubitemid 26110438)