The Normal Age-Corrected and Reaction Time-Corrected Isopter Derived by Semi-automated Kinetic Perimetry

Ophthalmology

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Vonthein, Reinhard ^a   Rauscher, Stephan ^b   Paetzold, Jens ^b   Nowomiejska, Katarzyna ^b,c   Krapp, Elke ^b   Hermann, Agnes ^b   Sadowski, Bettina ^b   Chaumette, Céline ^d   Wild, John M ^e   Schiefer, Ulrich ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LUBLIN   (Poland)

^d Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve Saint Georges   (France)

^e CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 34249708523     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.030     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Harrington D.O., and Drake M.V. The Visual Fields: Text and Atlas of Clinical Perimetry. 6th ed. (1990), Mosby, St. Louis 13-24
2. Hudson C., and Wild J.M. Assessment of physiologic statokinetic dissociation by automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 (1992) 3162-3168
3. Aulhorn E., and Harms H. Visual perimetry. In: Jameson D., and Hurvich L.M. (Eds). Visual Psychophysics Vol. 7 (1972), Springer, Berlin 102-145 Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Part 4
4. Empfehlung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes der Augenärzte Deutschlands zur Fahreignungsbegutachtung für den Straßenverkehr (2003), Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft, Munich 1-80. http://www.dog.org/publikationen-verkehrskommission/traffic_2003.htm http://www.dog.org/publikationen-verkehrskommission/traffic_2003.htm. Accessed November 29, 2006
5. Goldmann H. Ein selbstregistrierendes Projektionskugelperimeter. Ophthalmologica 109 (1945) 71-79
6. Zingirian M., Gandolfo E., and Orciuolo M. Automation of the Goldmann perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42 (1983) 103-107
7. Zingirian M., Gandolfo E., Capris P., and Mattioli R. Computerized system for static and kinetic automatic perimetry. Eur J Ophthalmol 1 (1991) 181-186
8. Ballon B.J., Echelman D.A., Shields M.B., and Ollie A.R. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (1992) 1730-1732
9. Parrish II R.K., Schiffman J., and Anderson D.R. Static and kinetic visual field testing: reproducibility in normal volunteers. Arch Ophthalmol 102 (1984) 1497-1502
10. Schiefer U., Schiller J., Paetzold J., et al. Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry. [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218 (2001) 13-20
11. Schiefer U., Schiller J., Dietrich T.J., et al. Evaluation of advanced visual field loss with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry. In: Wall M., and Mills R.P. (Eds). Perimetry Update 2000/2001 (2001), Kugler, The Hague 131-138
12. Wabbels B.K., and Kolling G. Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities. [in German]. Ophthalmologe 98 (2001) 168-173
13. Schiefer U., Rauscher S., Hermann A., et al. Realization of semi-automated kinetic perimetry with the Interzeag Octopus 101 instrument. In: Henson D.B., and Wall M. (Eds). Perimetry Update 2002/2003 (2003), Kugler, The Hague 233-238
14. Nowomiejska K., Paetzold J., Krapp E., et al. Applicability of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in the assessment of the visual field loss due to retinitis pigmentosa. [in Polish]. Klin Oczna 106 suppl (2004) 500-502
15. Nowomiejska K., Vonthein R., Paetzold J., et al. Comparison between semi-automated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 1343-1354
16. Pineles S.L., Volpe N.J., Miller-Ellis E., et al. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 124 (2006) 363-369
17. Schiefer U., Nowomiejska K.E., Krapp E., et al. K-Train-a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 224 (2006) 1300-1309
18. Fankhauser F. Kinetic perimetry. [in German]. Ophthalmologica 158 (1969) 406-418
19. Johnson C.A., and Keltner J.L. Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105 (1987) 73-75
20. Ffytche D.H., Guy C.N., and Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain 118 (1995) 1375-1394
21. Niederhauser S., and Mojon D.S. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Ophthalmologica 216 (2002) 406-408
22. Egge K. The visual field in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 169 (1984) 1-64
23. Zingirian M., Calabria G., and Gandolfo E. The nasal step in normal and glaucomatous visual fields. Can J Ophthalmol 14 (1979) 88-94
24. Johnson C.A., Keltner J.L., and Jacob M.P. New test procedures for the SQUID automated perimeter. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 44 (1985) 91
25. Wedemeyer L., Johnson C.A., and Keltner J.L. Statokinetic dissociation in optic nerve disease. In: Heijl A. (Ed). Perimetry Update 1988/1989 (1989), Kugler, Amsterdam 9-14
26. Wabbels B., and Kolling G. Automatische kinetische Perimetrie mit unterschiedlichen Prüfgeschwindigkeiten. Ophthalmologe 98 (2001) 168-173