Is there evidence for continued learning over multiple years in perimetry?

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 85, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1043-1048

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Demirel, Shaban ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning effects; Longitudinal study; Perimetry; Progression; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

LEARNING EFFECTS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PROGRESSION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EDUCATION; VISION;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; DETERIORATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE COURSE; EYE; EYE EXAMINATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHORT WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; STANDARD AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; VALIDITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD; AUTOMATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

AUTOMATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 59249102967     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b9b40     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:158-73.
2. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, Sanchez-Galeana CA, Vasile C, Weinreb RN. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:985-93.
3. Girkin CA. Relationship between structure of optic nerve/nerve fiber layer and functional measurements in glaucoma. Curr Opin Oph-thalmol 2004;15:96-101.
4. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46:3712-7.
5. Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Modeling the sensitivity to variability relationship in perimetry. Vision Res 2006;46:1732-45.
6. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
7. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, FingeretM,Keltner JL, Spry PG, Wall M, Werner JS. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1540-8.
8. Wild JM. Short wavelength automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79:546-59.
9. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1994;3:S32-44.
10. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:81-6.
11. Wild JM, Dengler-Harles M, Searle AE, O'Neill EC, Crews SJ. The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989;67: 537-45.
12. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:19-22.
13. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Spry PG. Normal age-related sensitivity loss for a variety of visual functions throughout the visual field. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:438-43.
14. Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:206-15.
15. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:309-13.
16. Hutchings N, Hosking SL, Wild JM, Flanagan JG. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42: 2332-7.
17. Werner EB, Krupin T, Adelson A, Feitl ME. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Ophthalmology 1990;97:44-8.
18. Schultz JS. The "learning effect" in automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1990;97:838.
19. Spry PG, Johnson CA, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2005;14:11-9.
20. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43: 2654-9.
21. Sample PA, Johnson CA, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Adams AJ. Optimum parameters for short-wavelength automated perimetry. J Glaucoma 1996;5:375-83.
22. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:2056-64.
23. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Twelker JD, Quigg JM. Age-related changes in the central visual field for short-wavelength-sensitive pathways. J Opt Soc Am A 1988;5:2131-9.
24. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22.
25. Anderson AJ, McKendrick AM. Quantifying adaptation and fatigue effects in frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:943-8.
26. Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4600-6.