Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions

Teachers College Record

Volumn 113, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2844-2877

  Boerst, Timothy ^a   Sleep, Laurie ^a   Ball, Deborah ^a   Hyman, Bass ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858952945     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Bahr, D., & Garcia, L. (2010). Elementary mathematics is anything by elementary: Content and methods from a developmental perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Ball, D. L. (2001). Teaching, with respect to mathematics and students. In T. Woods, B. Nelson, &J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 11-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillips (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Constructivism in education (pp. 193-224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14-17, 20-22, 43-46.
5. Ball, D. L., Hoover, M., Lewis, J., Bass, H., & Wall, E. (2003, April). In attention to equity in teaching elementary mathematics? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
6. Ball, D. L., Sleep. L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal 109, 458-474.
7. Boerst, T., & Sleep, L. (2007, April). Uses and meanings of "practice" in learning to do the work of mathematics teaching. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Boerst, T., Sleep, L., Cole, Y., & Ball, D. L. (2008, April). Learning practice through practice: Design considerations of a practice-based course. Presentation made at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research presession, Salt Lake City, UT.
9. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. (1999). Children's mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2003). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
11. Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Monograph No. 4, 107-124.
12. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhandng professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
13. DIAS Project. (2009). Leading a discussion scoring guide. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
14. Ghousseini, H., & Sleep, L. (2011). Making practice studyable. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(1), 147-160.
15. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055-2100.
16. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal 45, 184-205.
17. Grossman, P., & Shahan, E. (2005, April). The anatomy of practice: The use of decomposition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
18. Heaton, R. (2000). Teaching mathematics to new standards: Relearning the dance. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Hoyles, C. (1985). What is the point of group discussions in mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 205-214.
21. INTASC. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
22. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Lampert, M. (2005, April). Preparing teachers for ambitious instructional practice: Learning to listen and to construct an appropriate response. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
24. Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21-34.
25. Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003) Communication and learning in the mathematics classroom. In J. Kilpatrick & D. Shifter (Eds.), Research companion to the NCTM standards (pp. 237-249). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
26. Lewis, J. L. (2007). Teaching as invisible work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
27. MacLeod, G. (1987). Microteaching: End of a research era? International Journal of Educational Research, //,531-541.
28. Martino, A., & Maher, C. (1999) Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 53-78.
29. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C, & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27, 283-297.
30. Morris, A., & Hiebert,J. (2009). Introduction: Building knowledge bases and improving systems of practice. Elementary School Journal 109, 429 -441.
31. Moss, P. (2010). Thinking systematically about assessment practice. In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 355-374). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Moss, P., Boerst, T., & Duckor, B. (2008, April). Developing an Integrated Assessment System (DIAS) in elementary mathematics teacher education: Constructing and interpreting records of practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
33. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2001). Middle childhood generalist standards (2nd ed.) Arlington, VA: Author.
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Prindples and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36. O'Connor, M. C, & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 24, 318-335.
37. Perrone, V. (2000). Lessons for new teachers. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
38. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge.
39. Rittenhouse, P. (1998). The teacher's role in mathematical conversation: Stepping in and stepping out, In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school (pp. 163189). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Sherin, M. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 119-150. Shulman, L. (1999, June/August). Taking learning seriously. Change, pp. 11-17.
41. Sleep, L. (2009). Teaching to the mathematical point: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
42. Smith, M., Hughes, E., Engle, R., & Stein, M. (2009). Orchestrating discussions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14, 549-556.
43. Teacher Education Initiative. (2009). High-leverage teaching practices (report revised 3/27/09). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Curriculum Group.
44. TERC. (1998). Investigations in number, data, and space. White Plains, NY: Dale Seymour.
45. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-476.