Constructions are catenae: Construction grammar meets dependency grammar

Cognitive Linguistics

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 165-216

  Osborne, Timothy ^a   Gross, Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Catena; Construction Grammar (CxG); Constructions; Constructs; Dependency Grammar (DG)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858668659     PISSN: 09365907     EISSN: 16133641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cog-2012-0006     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
2. Anderson, John. 1979. On Case Grammar: Prolegomena to a theory of grammatical relations. London: Croom Helm.
3. Baumgärtner, Klaus. 1970. Konstituenz und Dependenz: Zur Integration der beiden grammatischen Prinzipien. In Hugo Steger (ed.), Vorschläge für eine strukturale Grammatik des Deutschen, 52-77. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt.
4. Bergen, Benjamin & Nancy Chang. 2005. Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 147-190. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Borsley, Robert. 2004. An approach to English comparative correlatives. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2004 conference, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 70-92. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
6. Bröker, Norbert. 2003. Formal foundations of dependency grammar. In Vilmos Ágel et al. (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research 1. 294-310. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
7. Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 1999. The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 543-571.
11. Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press.
12. Da̧browksa, Eva & Elena V. M. Lieven. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16. 437-474.
13. Diessel, Holger. 2005. The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 92-142.
15. Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81. 1-25.
16. Diewald, Gabriele. 2009. Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 31. 445-468.
17. Elst, Gaston van der & Mechthild Habermann. 1997. Syntaktische Analyse, 6th edition. Erlangen: Palm und Enke.
18. Engel, Ulrich. 1977. Syntax der deutchen Gegenwartssprache, 1st edition. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
19. Engel, Ulrich. 1994. Syntax der deutchen Gegenwartssprache, 3rd edition. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
20. Eroms, Hans-Werner. 2000. Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning. 29-53. Oxford: Carlendon Press.
21. Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Goldberg, Adele. 2009. The nature of generalizations in language. Cognitive Linguistics 20. 93-127.
23. Goldberg, Adele & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80. 532-568. (Pubitemid 41424797)
24. Groß, Thomas. 1999. Theoretical Foundations of Dependency Syntax. Munich: Iudicium.
25. Groß, Thomas. 2010. Chains in syntax and morphology. In Otoguro Ryo, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Uemoto, Kei Yoshimoto & Yasunari Harada (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation at Tohoku University. 143-152. Tokyo: Waseda University.
26. Groß, Thomas & Timothy Osborne. 2009. Toward a practical dependency grammar theory of discontinuities. Sky Journal of Linguistics 22. 43-90.
27. Hays, David. 1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40. 511-525.
28. Heringer, Hans. 1996. Deutsche Syntax dependentiell. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
29. Holmes, Jasper & Richard Hudson. 2005. Constructions in Word Grammar. In Jan-Ola, Ostman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. 243-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Horn, George. 2003. Idioms, metaphors, and syntactic mobility. Journal of Linguistics 39. 245-273.
31. Hudson, Richard. 1984. Word Grammar. New York: Basil Blackwell.
32. Hudson, Richard. 1990. An English Word Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Hudson, Richard. 2000. Discontinuities. In Sylvain Kahane (ed.), Les grammaires de dépendance (Dependency grammars), Traitement automatique des langues 41. 7-56. Paris: Hermes.
34. Hudson, Richard. 2003. The psychological reality of syntactic dependency relations. Sylvain Kahane & Alexis Nasr (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory. 181-192. Paris: Ecole Normale Superieure.
35. Hudson, Richard. 2007. Language networks: The new Word Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Hudson, Richard. 2010. An introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Joshi, Aravind & Owen Rambow. 2003. A formalism for dependency grammar based on Tree Adjoining Grammar. In Proceedings of the Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, Paris, France.
38. Jung, Wha-Young. 1995. Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenzgrammatik. Hamburg: Buske.
39. Kahane, Sylvaine (ed.). 2000. Les grammaires de dépendance (Dependency grammars), Traitement automatique des langues 41. Paris: Hermes.
40. Kathol, Andreas. 1995. Linearization-based German syntax. Ph.D dissertation, Ohio State University.
41. Kay, Paul. 2002. An informal sketch of a formal architecture for Construction Grammar. Grammars 5. 1-19. (Pubitemid 34239107)
42. Kay, Paul & Charles Fillmore. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75. 1-33.
43. Kunze, Jürgen. 1975. Abhängigkeitsgrammatik (Studia Grammatica XII). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
44. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
45. Langacker, Ronald. 1997. Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 8(1). 1-32.
46. Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Leiss, Elisabeth. 2003. Empirische Argumente für Dependenz. Vilmos Ágel et al. (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research 1. 311-324. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
48. Lieven, Elena. 2009. Developing constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 20. 191-199.
49. Lobin, Hennig. 1993. Koordinationssyantax als prozedurales Phänomen. Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 46. Tübingen: Narr.
50. Matthews, Peter. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
51. McCawley, James. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1). 91-106.
52. Mel'čuk, Igor. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
53. Mel'čuk, Igor. 2003. Levels of dependency in linguistic description: Concepts and problems. In Vilmos Ágel et al. (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of Contemporary research 1. 188-229. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
54. Michaelis, Laura. 2003. Headless constructions and coercion by construction. In Elaine Francis & Laura Michaelis (eds.), Mismatch: Form-function incongruity and the architecture of Grammar. 259-310. CSLI Publications.
55. Michaelis, Laura. 2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 1-67. (Pubitemid 40390339)
56. Michaelis, Laura. in press. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Michaelis, Laura & Knud Lambrecht. 1996. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72. 215-247. (Pubitemid 126421025)
58. Müller, Stefan. 2006. Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82(4). 850-883.
59. Müller, Stefan. 2010. Grammatiktheorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
60. Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan Sag & Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70. 491-538.
61. O'Grady, William. 1998. The syntax of idioms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 79-312.
62. Osborne, Timothy. 2005. Beyond the constituent: A DG analysis of chains. Folia Linguistica 39(3-4). 251-297.
63. Osborne, Timothy. 2006. Shared material and grammar: A DG theory of non-gapping coordination. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25. 39-93.
64. Osborne, Timothy. 2007. The weight of predicates: A DG analysis of predicate weight in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19(1). 23-72.
65. Osborne, Timothy. 2008. Major constituents: And two DG constraints on sharing in coordination. Linguistics 46. 1109-1165.
66. Osborne, Timothy, Michael Putnam & Thomas Groß. 2013. Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax.
67. Pickering, Martin & Guy Barry. 1993. Dependency categorial grammar and coordination. Linguistics 31. 855-902.
68. Robinson, Jane. 1970. Dependency structures and transformational rules. Language 46. 259-285.
69. Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, M. I. T.
70. Sag, Ivan. 2010. Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An informal synopsis. In Hans Boas & Ivan Sag (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. 39-160. CSLI.
71. Schubert, Klaus. 1988. Metataxis: Contrastive dependency syntax for machine translation. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.
72. Starosta, Stanley. 1988. The case for Lexicase: An outline of Lexicase grammatical theory. New York: Pinter Publishers.
73. Starosta, Stanley. 2003. Lexicase grammar. In Vilmos Ágel et al. (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research 1. 526-545. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
74. Tarvainen, Kalevi. 2000. Einführung in die Dependenzgrammatik (Reihe germanistische Linguistik 35). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
75. Tesnière, Lucièn. 1959. Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
76. Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Tomasello, Michael. 2006a. Construction Grammar for kids. Available online at: http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/specvol1/689 [accessed 27 April 2011].
79. Tomasello, Michael. 2006b. Acquiring linguistic constructions. In Deanna Kuhn & Robert Siegler (eds.), Handbook of child psychology. 255-298. New York: Wiley.
80. Wells, Rulon. 1947. Immediate constituents. Language 23(2). 81-117.
81. Zwicky, Arnold. 1987. Constructions in monostratal syntax. The 23rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (Part 1, general session) 23. 389-401.