Major constituents and two dependency grammar constraints on sharing in coordination

Linguistics

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1109-1165

  Osborne, Timothy ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949142562     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LING.2008.036     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Allerton, David (1979). Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View of Syntax and Morphology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Anderson, John (1979). On Case Grammar: Prolegoena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.
3. Barss, Andrew and Lasnik, Howard (1986). A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347-354.
4. Baumgärtner, Klaus (1970). Konstituenz und Dependenz. In Vorschläge für eine strukturale Grammatik des Deutschen, Hugo Steger (ed.), 52-77. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
5. Borsley, Robert (1994). In defense of coordinate structures. Linguistic Analysis 24, 218-246.
6. Borsley, Robert (1999). Syntactic Theory: A Unified Approach, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.
7. Brody, Michael (2003). Towards an Elegant Syntax. London: Routledge.
8. Brown, Keith and Miller, James (1980). Syntax: A Linguistic Introduction to Sentence Structure. London: Hutchinson.
9. Carnie, Andrew (2002). Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Carlson, Katy (2002). Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences. New York: Routledge.
11. Chao, Wynn (1988). On ellipsis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
12. Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Dalrymple, Mary (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. Syntax and Semantics 34. San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Dinneen, Francis P. (1995). General Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
15. Dougherty, Ray (1970). A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures. Language 46, 850-898.
16. Dowty, David (1988). Type raising, functional composition, and nonconstituent conjunction. In Categorical Grammars and Natural Language Structures, Richard Oehrle, Emmon Bach, and Deirdre Wheeler (eds.), 153-197. Dordrecht: Reidel.
17. van der Elst, Gaston and Habermann, Mechthild (1997). Syntaktische Analyse. 6th rev. ed. Erlangen: Palm und Enke.
18. Engel, Ulrich (1982). Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Schmidt.
19. Eroms, Hans-Werner (2000). Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
20. Gazdar, Gerald (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155-184.
21. Gazdar, Gerald; Klein, Ewald; Pullum, Geoffrey; and Sag, Ivan (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Greenberg, Joseph (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 73-113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Grewendorf, Günther (1988). Aspekte der deutschen Syntax: Eine Rektions-Bindungs-Analyse. Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 33. Tübingen: Narr.
24. Groß, Thomas (1999). Theoretical Foundations of Dependency Syntax. Munich: Iudicium.
25. Haegeman, Liliane and Guéron, Jacqueline (1999). English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
26. Hankamer, Jorge (1973). Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 17-68.
27. Hartmann, Katharina (2000). Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
28. Hays, David (1964). Dependency theory: a formalism and some observations. Language 40, 511-525.
29. Helbig, Gerhard and Buscha, Joachim (1981). Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Leipzig: VEB.
30. Hentschel, Elke and Weydt, Harald (2003). Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik, 3rd rev. ed. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
31. Heringer, Hans J. (1996). Deutsche Syntax dependentiell. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.
32. Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Hudson, Richard (1980). Constituency and dependency. Linguistics 18(3/4), 179-198.
34. Hudson, Richard (1982). Incomplete conjuncts. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 547-550.
35. Hudson, Richard (1984). Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Hudson, Richard (1988). Coordination and grammatical relations. Journal of Linguistics 24, 303-342.
37. Hudson, Richard (1989). Gapping and grammatical relations. Linguistics 25, 57-94.
38. Hudson, Richard (1990). An English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Hudson, Richard (2000). Discontinuity. In Les grammaires de dépendance (Dependency Grammars), Traitement automatique des langues 41, Sylvain Kahane (ed.), 15-56. Paris: Hermes.
40. Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 21-35.
41. Jackendoff, Ray (1977). X′ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Jackendoff, Ray (1990). On Larson's analysis of the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 427-456.
43. Jacobson, Pauline (1996). Constituent structure. In Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories. Cambridge: Pergamon.
44. Johannessen, Janne (1996). Partial Agreement and Coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 27(4), 661-676.
45. Johannessen, Janne (1998). Coordination. New York: Oxford University Press. Jung, Wha-Young (1995). Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenzgrammatik. Hamburg: Buske.
46. Kayne, Richard (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Klein, Wolfgang (1981). Some rules of regular ellipsis. In Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistic Studies: Studies Presented to Manfred Bierwisch, W. Klein and W. J. M. Levelt (eds.), 51-78. Dordrecht: Reidel.
48. Koutsoudas, Andreas (1971). Gapping, coordination reduction, and identity deletion. Foundations of Language 7, 337-386.
49. Kuno, Susumo (1976). Gapping: a functional analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 300-318.
50. Kunze, Jürgen (1975). Abhängigkeitsgrammatik. Studia Grammatica XII. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
51. Larson, Richard (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335-392.
52. Larson, Richard (1990). Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4), 589-632.
53. Lasnik, Howard (2000). Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Lühr, Rosemarie (1993). Neuhochdeutsch: Eine Einführung in die Sprachwissenschaft, 4th ed. Munich: Fink.
55. Matthews, Peter (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. McCawley, James (1997). The Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Meibauer, Jörg; Demske, Ulrike; Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jochen; Pafel, Jürgen; Ramers, Karl-Heinz; Rothweiler, Monika; and Steinbach, Markus (2002). Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. Stuttgart: Metzler.
58. Mel'čuk, Igor (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
59. Munn, Alan (2000). Three types of coordination asymmetries. In Ellipsis in Conjunction, Linguistische Arbeiten 418, Kerstin Schwabe and Niina Zhang (eds.), 1-22. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
60. Napoli, Donna Jo (1993). Syntax: Theory and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Neijt, Anneke (1980). Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
62. Neijt, Anneke (1981). Gaps and remnants - sentence grammar aspects of gapping. Linguistic Analysis 8(1), 69-93.
63. Neijt, Anneke (1989). Review of The Syntax of Coordination. Lingua 31, 342-357.
64. Nerbonne, John (1994). Partial verb phrases and spurious ambiguities. In German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter, and Carl Pollard (eds.), 109-150. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
65. O'Grady, William (1998). The syntax of idioms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 79-312.
66. van Oirsouw, Robert (1987). The Syntax of Coordination. New York: Croom Helm.
67. Osborne, Timothy (2006). Beyond the constituent: a dependency grammar analysis of chains. Folia Linguistica XXXIX(2-4), 251-297.
68. Ouhalla, Jamal (1994). Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
69. Pesetsky, David (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Peterson, Peter (2004). Coordination: Consequences of a Lexical-Functional account. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(3), 643-679.
71. Phillips, Colin (2003). Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1), 37-90.
72. Pickering, Martin; and Barry, Guy (1993). Dependency categorial grammar and coordination. Linguistics 31, 855-902.
73. Poole, Geoffrey (2002). Syntactic Theory. New York: Palgrave.
74. Quirk, Randolf; Greenbaum, Sydney; Leech, Geoffrey; and Svartvik, Jan (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
75. Radford, Andrew (1997). Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Radford, Andrew (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Ross, John (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
78. Ross, John (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In Recent Developments in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Heidolph (eds.), 245-259. The Hague: Mouton.
79. Ross, John (1986). Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
80. Sag, Ivan (1976). Deletion and logical form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club (1977)]
81. Sag, Ivan; Gazdar, Gerald; Wasow, Thomas; and Weisler, Steven (1985). Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 117-171.
82. Schubert, Klaus (1988). Metataxis: Contrastive Dependency Syntax for Machine Translation. Dordrecht: Foris.
83. Siewierska, Anna (1988). Word Order Rules. London: Croom Helm.
84. Sitta, Horst (1998). Der Satz. In Duden: Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 6th rev, ed. Peter Eisenberg, Hermann Gelhaus, Helmut Henne, Horst Sitta, and Hans Wellmann (eds.), 609-858. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
85. Starosta, Stanley (1988). The Case for Lexicase: An Outline of Lexicase Grammatical Theory. New York: Pinter.
86. Tarvainen, Kalevi (2000). Einführung in die Dependenzgrammatik, 2nd ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
87. Tesnière, Lucien (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
88. Tesnière, Lucien (1969). Eléments de syntax structurale, 2nd rev. ed. Paris Klincksieck.
89. Trask, Robert (1997). A Student's Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Arnold.
90. Wesche, Birgit (1995). Symmetric Coordination: An Alternative Theory of Phrase Structure. Linguistische Arbeiten 332. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
91. Wilder, Chris (1994). Coordination, ATB and ellipsis. In Minimalism and Kayne's Asymmetry Hypothesis, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 37, Jan-Wouter Zwart (ed.), 291-329. Groningen: University of Groningen.
92. Wilder, Chris (1996). V2-Effekte: Wortstellungen und Ellipsen. In Deutsch-typologisch, Ewald Lang and Gisela Zifonun (eds.), 142-180. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
93. Wilder, Chris (1997). Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, Artemis Alexiadou and T. Alan Hall (eds.): 59-106. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
94. Williams, Edwin (1978). Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 31-43.
95. Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika; Heilmann, Axel; Stepan, Peter; and Vikner, Sten (1997). Deutsche Satzstruktur: Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
96. Wood, Mary McGee (1993). Categorical Grammars. London: Routledge.
97. Zifonun, Gisela; Hoffmann, Ludger; Strecker, Bruno (1997). Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Vol. 1. Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache 7. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
98. Zoerner, Cyril E. (1999). One coordinator for all. Linguistic Analysis 29(3/4), 324-341.
99. Zoerner, Cyril E. and Agbayani, Brian (2000). Unifying left-peripheral deletion, gapping, and pseudogapping. In Proceedings of CLS 36-1: The Main Session, Akira Okrent and John P. Boyle (eds.), 549-561.