Five-step methodology for evaluation and adaptation of print patient health information to meet the <5th grade readability criterion

Medical Care

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 294-301

  Hill Briggs, Felicia ^a,b,c   Schumann, Kristina P ^b,d   Dike, Ogechi ^e  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Johns Hopkins Bloomberg   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^e RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiovascular diseases; diabetes; educational status; evaluation; learning; lifestyle; literacy; patient education; readability; self care

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

COMPREHENSION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; READING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84858661919     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318249d6c8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berkman ND, DeWalt DA, Pignone M, et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 87 AHRQ Publication No 04-E007-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
2. Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A prescription to End Confusion. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2004.
3. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, et al. Literacy in Everyday Life: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy NCES 2007-480. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Education; 2007.
4. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, et al. The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results From the 2003 National Survey of Adult Literacy NCES 2006-483. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Education; 2007.
5. Sentell TL, Halpin HA. Importance of adult literacy in understanding health disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21: 862-866. (Pubitemid 44024934)
6. Osborn CY, Paasche-Orlow MK, Davis TC, et al. Health literacy: an overlooked factor in understanding HIV health disparities. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:374-378. (Pubitemid 47575812)
7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit. AHRQ Publication No. 10-0046-EF. Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2010. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/literacy/index.html. Accessed September 8, 2011.
8. Plain Writing Act of 2010: Public Law 111-274, 111th Congress [Plain Language web site]. Available at: http://www.plainlanguage.gov/plLaw/index.cfm. Accessed April 16, 2011.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Scientific and Technical Information Simply Put. 2nd ed. Atlanta: Office of Communication, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.
10. National Cancer Institute. Clear and Simple: Developing Effective Print Materials for Low-Literate Readers. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
11. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1996.
12. Aldridge MD. Writing and designing readable patient education materials. Nephrol Nurs J. 2004;31:373-377.
13. McInnes N, Haglund BJ. Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Inform Health Soc Care. 2011. [Epub ahead of print, PMID: 21332302].
14. Hill-Briggs F, Smith AS. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low health literate populations. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:667-671.
15. Kellerman R, Weiss BD. Health literacy and the JAMA patient page. JAMA. 1999;282:525-527.
16. Microsoft Office Support. Test your document's readability: Understand readability scores [Microsoft Office Support web site]. Available at: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/test-your-document-s-read ability-HP010148506.aspx#BM2. Accessed April 16, 2011.
17. Mead CD, Smith CF. Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 1991;17:153-158.
18. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33:352-373. (Pubitemid 43725866)
19. Hill-Briggs F, Renosky R, Lazo M, et al. Development and pilot evaluation of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD education in urban, diabetic African Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23: 1491-1494.
20. Hill-Briggs F, Lazo M, Renosky R, et al. Usability of a diabetes and cardiovascular disease education module in an African American, diabetic sample with physical, visual, and cognitive impairment. Rehabil Psychol. 2008;53:1-8. (Pubitemid 351417973)
21. Hill-Briggs F, Lazo M, Peyrot M, et al. Effect of problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training on diabetes control in a low income patient sample. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:972-978.
22. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, et al. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients' knowledge of their chronic disease: a study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158: 166-172. (Pubitemid 28049510)
23. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475-482. (Pubitemid 34787479)
24. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, et al. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1027-1030. (Pubitemid 27295085)
25. Yin HS, Johnson M, Mendelsohn AL, et al. The health literacy of parents in the United States: a nationally representative study. Pediatrics. 2009;124(suppl 3):S289-S298.