Readability of online health information: Implications for health literacy

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 173-189

  McInnes, Nicholas ^a   Haglund, Bo J A ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Health literacy; information; Internet; online; readability

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; SEARCH ENGINE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 80054886923     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2010.542529     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Fox S, Online Health Search. 2006. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2006/Online-Health-Search-2006.aspx=1. Last accessed February 2010
2. Fox S, Jones S. The Social Life of Health Information, Americans' pursuit of health takes place within a widening network of both online and offline sources. 2009. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Lifeof- Health-Information.aspx=1. Last accessed February 2010
3. European Commission. e-Europe 2002: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health related Websites. 2002. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX: 52002DC0667:EN:HTML. Last accessed February 2010
4. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L, Arocha JF. Health literacy and the World Wide Web: comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2006;31:67-87
5. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). 2003. http://nces.ed.gov/naal. Last accessed February 2010
6. Centre for Literacy of Quebec. Background Document on Literacy and Health. 2001. http://www.nald.ca/PROVINCE/QUE/litcent/health/finalsum/bd/bd3- sec1.html. Last accessed February 2010
7. Kiel JM. The digital divide: Internet and e-mail use by the elderly. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2005;30:19-23
8. The Moser Group. A fresh start: improving literacy and numeracy. The Report of the Working Group Chaired by Sir Claus Moser. 1999. http://www.lifelonglearning.co.uk/mosergroup/. Last accessed February 2010
9. National Literacy Trust. Adult Literacy Levels in the UK. 2009. http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/database/stats/adultstats.html. Last accessed February 2010
10. Wang SW, Capo JT, Orillaza N. Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites. Journal of Hand Surgery 2009;34:1308-1315
11. Sabharwal S, Badarudeen S, Unes Kunju S. Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2008;466:1245-1250
12. Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respiratory Care 2008;53:1310-1315
13. Birru M, Steinman RA. Online health information and low-literacy African Americans. Journal of Medical and Internet Research 2004;6:e26
14. WHO. The European health report 2009, Health and health systems. 2009. http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E93103.pdf. Last accessed February 2010
15. WHO. Largely preventable chronic diseases cause 86% of deaths in Europe: 53 WHO European Member States map a strategy to curb the epidemic. Press Release EURO/05/06, Copenhagen, 11 September 2006. http://www.euro.who.int/mediacentre/ PR/2006/20060908-1. Last accessed February 2010
16. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, Wynn R. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BioMed Central Public Health 2007;7:53
17. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. 2007. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Epatients-With-a-Disability-or-Chronic- Disease.aspx=1. Last accessed February 2010
18. Hernandez L. Health literacy, eHealth, and communication: putting the consumer first. Workshop summary: roundtable on health literacy. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine; 2009
19. Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch H-U, Rasmussen J, Santana S, Staniszewski A, Wangberg SC. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008;10:e42
20. Bodie GD, Dutta MJ. Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: eHealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health Marketing Quarterly 2008;25:175-203
21. Nutbeam D. Health promotion glossary. Health Promotion 1986;1:113-127
22. WHO. 7th Global Conference on Health Promotion: track themes: Health literacy and health behaviour. 2009. http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/ conferences/7gchp/track2/en/index.html. Last accessed February 2010
23. American Medical Association. Health literacy: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999;281:552-557
24. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2002;52:134-149
25. Merriman B, Ades T, Seffrin JR. Health literacy in the information age: communicating cancer information to patients and families. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2002;52:130-133
26. Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS. Advancing health literacy: a framework for understanding and action. Jossey-Bass: J-B Public Health/Health Services Text; 2006
27. Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L. Adult literacy in America: a first look at the findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. 3rd ed, Washinton, D.C.: National Center for Education, U.S. Department of Education; 2002
28. Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Sudano J, Patterson M. The association between age and health literacy among elderly persons. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2000;55:368-374
29. Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research 1996;9:139-143
30. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education & Behavior 2006;33:352-373
31. Meade CD, Smith CF. Readability formulas: cautions and criterias. Patient Education and Counseling 1991;17:153-158
32. Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter-Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in healthrelated journals. Journal of Community Health 2005;30:213-219
33. Hochstotter N, Koch M. Standard parameters for searching behaviour in search engines and their empirical evaluation. Journal of Information Science 2009;35:45-65
34. Experian Hitwise. Top Search Engine. 2010. http://www.hitwise.com/us/ datacenter/main/dashboard-10133. html. Last accessed February 2010
35. WHO. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. 2004. http://www.who.int/entity/healthinfo/global-burden- disease/GBD-report- 2004update-full.pdf. Last accessed February 2010
36. Rainie L, Madden M, Boyce A, Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Allen K. The ever-shifting internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digitial divide. 2003. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2003/The-EverShifting- Internet-Population-A-new-look-at-Internet-access-and-the-digital-divide.aspx. Last accessed February 2010
37. National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Health Literacy. 2010. http://nnlm.gov/outreach/consumer/hlthlit.html. Last accessed February 2010
38. Chobot MC. The challenge of providing consumer health information services in public libraries. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2010. www.healthlit.org/pdfs/AAASFINAL.pdf. Last accessed August 2010
39. Kaduszkiewicz H, Rontgen I, Mossakowski K, van den Bussche H. [Stigma and taboo in dementia care -does continuing education for GPs and nurses contribute to destigmatisation]. Zeitschrift fu r Gerontologie und Geriatrie 2009;42:155-162
40. Room R. Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review 2005;24:143-155
41. TIME. Breast Cancer Awareness: "I Like It On My Status Update." 2010. http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/10/05/breast-cancer-awareness-i-like-it-on- my-status-update/. Last accessed October 2010
42. The Washington Post. Breast cancer awareness goes viral on Facebook . . . with bra color updates. 2010. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ article/2010/01/08/AR2010010803693.html. Last accessed October 2010
43. Eyetools Inc. Google Search's Golden Triangle. 2010. http://eyetools.com/ research-google-eyetracking-heatmap. html. Last accessed February 2010
44. Mosenthal PB, Kirsch IS. A new measure for assessing document complexity: the PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 1998;48:638-657
45. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1996
46. Ostrow A. The fastest growing social sites. 2009. http://mashable.com/ 2009/04/20/the-fastest-growing-socialsites/. Last accessed February 2010