Interactive brains, social minds

Communicative and Integrative Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 655-663

  Sänger, Johanna ^a   Lindenberger, Ulman ^a   Müller, Viktor ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action coordination; EEG and fMRI hyperscanning; Functional brain connectivity; Phase synchronization; Social cognition; Social interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858654767     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19420889     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cib.17934     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Hari R, Kujala MV. Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol Rev 2009; 89:453-79; DOI:10.1152/physrev.00041.2007.
2. Allport FH. Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1924.
3. Argyle M, Cook M. Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1976.
4. Emery NJ. The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2000; 24:581-604; DOI:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7.
5. Gallagher S. Two problems of intersubjectivity. J Conscious Stud 2009; 16:289-308.
6. Frith U, Frith CD. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358:459-73; DOI:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218.
7. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E, Gallagher S. Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14:441-7; DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009.
8. Nagao K, Takeuchi A. Social interaction: multimodal conversation with social agents. Proceedings of the 12th national conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94). Seattle, Washington: The MIT Press 1994; 22-8.
9. Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10:70-6; DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009.
10. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E. Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenom Cogn Sci 2007; 6:485-507.
11. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995; 269:1880-2; DOI:10.1126/science.7569931.
12. Anokhin PK. Beiträge zur allgemeinen Theorie des funktionellen Systems. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag 1978.
13. Wolpert DM, Miall RC. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 1996; 9:1265-79; DOI:10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4.
14. Blakemore SJ, Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2:561-7.
15. Pacherie E, Dokic J. From mirror neurons to joint actions. Cogn Syst Res 2006; 7:101-12; DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.012.
16. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2:661-70; DOI:10.1038/35090060.
17. Knoblich G, Sebanz N. Evolving intentions for social interaction: from entrainment to joint action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363:2021-31; DOI:10.1098/rstb.2008.0006.
18. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Zempel JM, Smyth MD, Raichle ME. Electrophysiological correlates of the brain's intrinsic large-scale functional architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:16039-44; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0807010105.
19. Raichle ME. The restless brain. Brain Connect 2011; 1:3-12; DOI:10.1089/brain.2011.0019.
20. Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB. When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8:547-58; DOI:10.1038/nrn2152.
21. Zhang D, Raichle ME. Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6:15-28; DOI:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198.
22. th International IEEE/EMBS Conference 2009; 167-70.
23. Schilbach L, Wohlschlaeger AM, Kraemer NC, Newen A, Shah NJ, Fink GR, et al. Being with virtual others: neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:718-30; DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017.
24. David N, Bewernick BH, Cohen MX, Newen A, Lux S, Fink GR, et al. Neural representations of self versus other: visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18:898-910; DOI:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.898.
25. McCabe K, Houser D, Ryan L, Smith V, Trouard T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in twoperson reciprocal exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:11832-5; DOI:10.1073/pnas.211415698.
26. Gallagher HL, Jack AI, Roepstorff A, Frith CD. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 2002; 16:814-21; DOI:10.1006/nimg.2002.1117.
27. Walter H, Adenzato M, Ciaramidaro A, Enrici I, Pia L, Bara BG. Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:1854-63; DOI:10.1162/0898929042947838.
28. Decety J, Jackson PL, Sommerville JA, Chaminade T, Meltzoff AN. The neural bases of cooperation and competition: a fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 2004; 23:744-51; DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.025.
29. Montague PR, Berns GS, Cohen JD, McClure SM, Pagnoni G, Dhamala M, et al. Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. Neuroimage 2002; 16:1159-64; DOI:10.1006/nimg.2002.1150.
30. King-Casas B, Tomlin D, Anen C, Camerer CF, Quartz SR, Montague PR. Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 2005; 308:78-83; DOI:10.1126/science.1108062.
31. Funane T, Kiguchi M, Atsumori H, Sato H, Kubota K, Koizumi H. Synchronous activity of two people's prefrontal cortices during a cooperative task measured by simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16:77011; DOI:10.1117/1.3602853.
32. Decety J, Chaminade T, Grezes J, Meltzoff AN. A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage 2002; 15:265-72; DOI:10.1006/nimg.2001.0938.
33. Guionnet S, Nadel J, Bertasi E, Sperduti M, Delaveau P, Fossati P. Reciprocal imitation: toward a neural basis of social interaction. Cereb Cortex 2011; In press; DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhr177.
34. Schippers MB, Roebroeck A, Renken R, Nanetti L, Keysers C. Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:9388-93; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1001791107.
35. Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969; 37:424-38; DOI:10.2307/1912791.
36. Gourévitch B, Bouquin-Jeannes RL, Faucon G. Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications. Biol Cybern 2006; 95:349-69; DOI:10.1007/s00422-006-0098-0.
37. Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage 2011; 54:875-91; DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063.
38. Stephens GJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:14425-30; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1008662107.
39. Hasson U, Nir Y, Levy I, Fuhrmann G, Malach R. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science 2004; 303:1634-40; DOI:10.1126/science.1089506.
40. Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Wascher E. Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18:859-70; DOI:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859.
41. Tognoli E, Lagarde J, DeGuzman GC, Kelso JA. The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:8190-5; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0611453104.
42. Roelfsema PR, Engel AK, Konig P, Singer W. Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature 1997; 385:157-61; DOI:10.1038/385157a0.
43. Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and largescale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2:229-39; DOI:10.1038/35067550.
44. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Oscillations in local field potentials of the primate motor cortex during voluntary movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:4470-4; DOI:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4470.
45. Makeig S, Jung TP. Tonic, phasic and transient EEG correlates of auditory awareness in drowsiness. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996; 4:15-25; DOI:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00042-9.
46. Kilner JM, Baker SN, Salenius S, Hari R, Lemon RN. Human cortical muscle coherence is directly related to specific motor parameters. J Neurosci 2000; 20:8838-45.
47. Singer W. Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures. Science 1995; 270:758-64; DOI:10.1126/science.270.5237.758.
48. Ben-Ari Y. Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends Neurosci 2001; 24:353-60; DOI:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01813-0.
49. Ben-Ari Y. Excitatory actions of GABA during development: the nature of the nurture. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3:728-39; DOI:10.1038/nrn920.
50. Lindenberger U, Li SC, Gruber W, Muller V. Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neurosci 2009; 10:22; DOI:10.1186/1471-2202-10-22.
51. Dumas G, Nadel J, Soussignan R, Martinerie J, Garnero L. Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:12166; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.
52. th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Engineer Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007:4953-6.
53. th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. Engineer Med Biol Soc 2007; 2007:4957-60.
54. Astolfi L, Toppi J, De Vico Fallani F, Vecchiato G, Salinari S, Mattia D, et al. Neuroelectrical hyperscanning measures simultaneous brain activity in humans. Brain Topogr 2010; 23:243-56; DOI:10.1007/s10548-010-0147-9.
55. Rotondo J, Boker SM. Behavioral synchronization in human conversational interaction. Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language. In: Stamenov MGV, Ed. Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language, Advances in Consciousness Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company 2002; 151-62.
56. Müller V, Lindenberger U. Cardiac and respiratory patterns synchronize between persons during choir singing. PLoS ONE 2011; 6(9): e24893; DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0024893.
57. Friston K. Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:33; DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000033.
58. Gates KM, Molenaar PC, Hillary FG, Ram N, Rovine MJ. Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: an alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR and unified SEM. Neuroimage 2010; 50:1118-25; DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117.
59. Gates KM, Molenaar PC, Hillary FG, Slobounov S. Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. Neuroimage 2011; 54:1151-8; DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051.
60. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003; 19:1273-302; DOI:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7.
61. Kim J, Zhu W, Chang L, Bentler PM, Ernst T. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28:85-93; DOI:10.1002/hbm.20259.
62. Rajapakse JC, Zhou J. Learning effective brain connectivity with dynamic Bayesian networks. Neuroimage 2007; 37:749-60; DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.003.
63. Kitzbichler MG, Smith ML, Christensen SR, Bullmore E. Broadband criticality of human brain network synchronization. PLOS Comput Biol 2009; 5:1000314; DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000314.