Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: Extensive study of commercial implants

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-32

  Bourauel, Christoph ^a   Aitlahrach, Maria ^a   Heinemann, Friedhelm ^b   Hasan, Istabrak ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Fi nite element method; Mini implants; Short implants; Strain; Stress

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONES; BONE SEGMENTS; CLINICAL SITUATIONS; CONTACT ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; CT SCANNING; ELEMENT METHOD; FE MODEL; FINITE ELEMENTS; GEOMETRY RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE LOADING; IMPLANT FAILURES; LOAD TRANSFER; MATERIAL BEHAVIOUR; OCCLUSAL FORCES; SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS; ULTIMATE STRENGTH; VON MISES STRESS;

BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOMETRY; PATIENT TREATMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; STRAIN; STRESSES;

BONE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EVALUATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; MAXILLA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84858642649     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0047     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ahn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 367-372.
2. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 553-559.
3. Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 32-37.
4. Dilek OC, Tezulas E. Treatment of a narrow, single tooth edentulous area with mini-dental implants: a clinical report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 22-25.
5. Dilek OC, Tezulas E, Dincel M. A mini dental implant-supported obturator application in a patient with partial maxillectomy due to tumour: case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 6-10.
6. Ertugrul HZ, Pipko DJ. Measuring mobility of 2 dental implant fixtures of different configurations: an in vitro study. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 290-297. (Pubitemid 44395223)
7. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Five-year survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined surfaced and Osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 16-23. (Pubitemid 39462752)
8. Flanagan D, Ilies H, Lasko B, Stack J. Force and movement of non-osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol 2009; 35: 270-276.
9. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 142-146.
10. Frost HM. Bone's Mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 275: 1081-1101. (Pubitemid 37486785)
11. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-598. (Pubitemid 33601386)
12. Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 930-937. (Pubitemid 43104472)
13. Gibney JW. Minimally invasive implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27:73-76.
14. Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 81-84.
15. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goene R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 210-216.
16. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short ( ? 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 798-804. (Pubitemid 39010990)
17. Hasan I, Heinemann F, Aitlahrach M, Bourauel C. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant. Biomed Tech 2010; 55: 341-350.
18. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 20-25. (Pubitemid 38083264)
19. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997; 23: 104-111.
20. International Organisation for Standardization. ISO 14801. Fatigue test for endosseous dental implants. Geneva: ISO 2003. http://www.iso.org.
21. Jofré J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 243-249.
22. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3I endosseous dental implants placet over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 73-83. (Pubitemid 126670569)
23. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991; 17: 126-131.
24. Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Twodimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: dia meter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990; 16: 6-11.
25. Mericske-Stern R. Overdentures with roots or implants for elderly patients: a comparison. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 543-550.
26. Rahimi A, Keilig L, Bendels G, et al. 3D reconstruction of dental specimens from 2D histological images and microCTscans. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2005; 8: 167-176.
27. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 (Suppl 1): S104-S110. (Pubitemid 40853694)
28. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 69-76. (Pubitemid 40353384)
29. Scortecci GM, Bert M, Leclercq P. Complications, prevention, correction and maintenance. In: Scortecci GM, Misch CE, Benner K-U, editors. Implants and Restorative Dentistry. London: Martin Dunitz 2001; 432-433.
30. Scurria MS, Morgan V, Guckes AD, Li S, Koch G. Prognostic variables associated with implant failure. A retrospective effectiveness study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 400-406. (Pubitemid 128506092)
31. Shatkin TE, Shatkin S, Oppenheimer AJ. Mini dental implants for the general dentists: a novel technical approach for smalldiameter implant placement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003; 24 (Suppl 1): 26-34.
32. Shatkin TE, Shatkin S, Oppenheimer BD, Oppenheimer AJ. Mini dental implants for long-term fixed and removable prosthetics: a retrospective analysis of 2514 implants placed over a five-year period. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28: 92-99.
33. Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig 2000; 4: 13-20.
34. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 275-282. (Pubitemid 43652373)
35. Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12-92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 894-901. (Pubitemid 38032653)
36. Teixeira ER, Wadamoto M, Akagawa Y, Kimoto T. Clinical application of short hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants to the posterior mandible: a five-year survival study. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 166-171.
37. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short ( < 10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:667-676
38. ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6 mm) non-submerged dental implants: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1-7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 791-798. (Pubitemid 128506101)
39. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitaion of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 588 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272-281.
40. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 22-31.