Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2-year retrospective clinical study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages s104-s110

  Renouard, Franck ^a   Nisand, David ^b  

^a Paris VII University ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Atrophic; Initial stability; Maxilla; Resorption; Short implants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXILLA; OSTEOLYSIS; PLASTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 20744446270     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00082.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brånemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:227-231.
2. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism. A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:272-281.
3. Wyatt CL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:204-211.
4. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:639-645.
5. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Thomsen P, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 3:CD003878. Review.
6. Berglundh T, Persson I, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29:197-212.
7. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8:328-343.
8. Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:405-414.
9. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3:39-49.
10. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO, et al. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004; 38:70-85.
11. Moy PK, Bain CA. Relation between fixture length and implant failure. J Dent Res 1992; 71:637 (Abstr).
12. Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J, Jaffin R, Vlassis J, Kumar A. Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in function. A retrospective study. J Periodontol 2004; 75:327-332.
13. Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:184-189.
14. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:476-485.
15. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:254-262.
16. Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1985:199-211.
17. Renouard F, Rangert B, editors. Treatment sequence and planning protocol. In: Risk factors in implant dentistry. Simplified clinical analysis for predictable treatment. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1999:160.
18. Khayat PG, Hallage PGH, Toledo RA. An investigation of 131 consecutively placed wide screw-vent implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:827-832.
19. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:151-161.
20. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:341-348.
21. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Brånemark system TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:57-63.
22. Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5:47-56.
23. Glauser R, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3:204-213.
24. Bahat O. Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:646-653.
25. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:279-286.
26. Pierrisnard L, Augereau D, Barquins M. Analyse comparative par la méthode des éléments finis des contraintes osseuses induites par des implants de géométrie variée. 2ème partie: influence relative de la longueur et de l'orientation des implants. Implants 2000; 6:93-105.
27. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002; 30:41-46.