Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 115-147

  Baillon, Aurélien ^a   Cabantous, Laure ^b   Wakker, Peter P ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ESCP EUROPE   (France)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Belief aggregation; Beliefs; Conflicting sources of information; Prospect theory; Source of uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858448907     PISSN: 08955646     EISSN: 15730476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-012-9140-x     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497-1512.
2. Abdellaoui, M., Vossmann, F., & Weber, M. (2005). Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Science, 51, 1384-1399.
3. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53, 1659-1674.
4. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L'Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 245-266.
5. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101, 695-723.
6. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk-taking situations. Econometrica, 19, 404-437.
7. Arrow, K. J., & Hurwicz, L. (1972). An optimality criterion for decision making under ignorance. In C. F. Carter & J. L. Ford (Eds.), Uncertainty and expectations in economics: Essays in Honour of G. L. S. Shackle (pp. 1-11). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8. Baraldi, P., & Zio, E. (2010). A comparison between probabilistic and Dempster-Shafer theory approaches to model uncertainty analysis in the performance assessment of radioactive waste repositories. Risk Analysis, 30, 1139-1156.
9. Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychological Review, 115, 463-501.
10. Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13, 193-212.
11. Budescu, D. V., & Yu, H.-T. (2006). To Bayes or not to Bayes? A comparison of two classes of models of information aggregation. Decision Analysis, 3, 145-162.
12. Budescu, D. V., & Yu, H.-T. (2007). Aggregation of opinions based on correlated cues and advisors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 153-177.
13. Budescu, D. V., Kuhn, K. M., Kramer, K. M., & Johnson, T. R. (2002). Modeling certainty equivalents for imprecise gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 748-768.
14. Budescu, D. V., Rantilla, A. K., Yu, H.-T., & Karelitz, T. M. (2003). The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 178-194.
15. Cabantous, L. (2007). Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: insurer's attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory and Decision, 62, 219-240.
16. Cabantous, L., Hilton, D., Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2011). Is imprecise knowledge better than conflicting expertise? Evidence from insurers' decisions in the United States. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42, 211-232.
17. Camerer, C. F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 61-104.
18. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42.
19. Camerer, C. F., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 325-370.
20. Cameron, T. A. (2005). Updating subjective risks in the presence of conflicting information: an application to climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 63-97.
21. Chow, C. C., & Sarin, R. K. (2001). Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg Paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22, 129-139.
22. Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1986). Combining economic forecasts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 4, 39-46.
23. Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1999). Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 19, 187-203.
24. Cooke, R. M. (1991). Experts in uncertainty; Opinion and subjective probability in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Crès, H., Gilboa, I., & Vieille, N. (2011). Aggregation of multiple prior opinions. Journal of Economic Theory, 146, 2563-2582.
26. Curley, S. P., & Yates, J. F. (1989). An empirical evaluation of descriptive models of ambiguity reactions in choice situations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 397-427.
27. de Lara Resende, J. G., & Wu, F. (2010). Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40, 109-132.
28. Dean, M., & Shepherd, R. (2007). Effects of information from sources in conflict and in consensus on perceptions of genetically modified food. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 460-469.
29. Dietrich, F. (2010). Bayesian group belief. Social Choice and Welfare, 35, 595-626.
30. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1985). Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review, 92, 433-461.
31. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
32. Etchart-Vincent, N. (2004). Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(3), 217-235.
33. Fellner, W. (1961). Distortion of subjective probabilities as a reaction to uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 670-689.
34. Fennema, H., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (1998). Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 277-295.
35. Fischer, G. W., Carmon, Z., Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (1999). Goal-based construction of preferences: task goals and the prominence effect. Management Science, 45, 1057-1075.
36. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44, 879-895.
37. Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2011). Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information. mimeo.
38. Gajdos, T., Hayashi, T., Tallon, J.-M., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2008). Attitude towards imprecise information. Journal of Economic Theory, 140, 27-65.
39. Gayer, G. (2010). Perception of probabilities in situations of risk; a case based approach. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 130-143.
40. Gilboa, I. (1987). Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 65-88.
41. Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141-153.
42. Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236-254.
43. Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59, 667-686.
44. Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: a challenge for psychologists? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383-403.
45. Ho, J. L. Y., Keller, L. R., & Keltyka, P. (2002). Effects of outcome and probabilistic ambiguity on managerial choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 47-74.
46. Ho, J. L. Y., Keller, L. R., & Keltyka, P. (2005). How do information ambiguity and timing of contextual information affect managers' goal congruence in making investment decisions in good time vs. bad times. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31, 163-186.
47. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1990). Venture theory: a model of decision weights. Management Science, 36, 780-803.
48. Hollard, G., Massoni, S., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2010). Subjective beliefs formation and elicitation rules: experimental evidence. mimeo.
49. Holt, C. A. (2007). Markets, games, & strategic behavior. London: Addison-Wesley.
50. Kahn, B. E., & Sarin, R. K. (1988). Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 265-272.
51. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1975). Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. Paper presented at a conference on Public Economics, Jerusalem, 1975.
52. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
53. Keren, G. B., & Teigen, K. H. (2001). Why is p =.90 better than p =.70? Preference for definitive predictions by lay consumers of probability judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 191-2002.
54. Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability (2nd ed.). London: McMillan. 1948.
55. Kilka, M., & Weber, M. (2001). What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty. Management Science, 47, 1712-1726.
56. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
57. Kopylov, I. (2008). Subjective probability and confidence. Irvine: IMBS & Econ. Dept.
58. Kunreuther, H. C., Meszaros, J., Hogarth, R. M., & Spranca, M. (1995). Ambiguity and underwriter decision processes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26, 337-352.
59. Kunreuther, H. C., Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Making low probabilities useful. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 103-120.
60. Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2006). Intuitions about combining opinions: misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Science, 52, 111-127.
61. Li, W. (2007). Changing one's mind when the facts change: incentives of experts and the design of reporting protocols. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 1175-1194.
62. Lobo, M. S., & Yao, D. (2010). Human judgement is heavy tailed: Empirical evidence and implications for the aggregation of estimates and forecasts. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
63. Machina, M. J. (1982). 'Expected utility' analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica, 50, 277-323.
64. Nau, R. F. (2002). The aggregation of imprecise probabilities. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 105, 265-282.
65. Noussair, C., Robbin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2004). Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: a comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 725-741.
66. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3, 323-343.
67. Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis. London: Addison-Wesley.
68. Roca, M., Hogarth, R. M., & John Maule, A. (2006). Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 175-194.
69. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. 1972, Dover Publications, New York.
70. Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571-587.
71. Smithson, M. J. (1999). Conflict aversion: preference for ambiguity vs conflict in sources and evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 179-198.
72. Teper, R. (2010). On comparison of non-Bayesian experts. Mathematical Social Sciences, 60, 119-122.
73. Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643-660.
74. Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102, 269-283.
75. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
76. Viscusi, W. K. (1989). Prospective reference theory: toward an explanation of the paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 235-264.
77. Viscusi, W. K. (1997). Alarmist decisions with divergent risk information. The Economic Journal, 107, 1657-1670.
78. Viscusi, W. K., & Chesson, H. W. (1999). Hopes and fears: the conflicting effects of risk ambiguity. Theory and Decision, 47, 153-178.
79. Viscusi, W. K., & Evans, W. N. (2006). Behavioral probabilities. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 5-15.
80. Viscusi, W. K., & Magat, W. A. (1992). Bayesian decisions with ambiguous belief aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 371-387.
81. Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., Carlin, A., & Dreyfus, M. K. (1994). Environmentally responsible energy pricing. The Energy Journal, 15, 23-42.
82. Viscusi, W. K., Phillips, O. R., & Kroll, S. (2011). Risky investment decisions: how are individuals influenced by their groups? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43, 81-106.
83. Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Wallsten, T. S., Forsyth, B. H., & Budescu, D. V. (1983). Stability and coherence of health experts' upper and lower subjective probabilities about dose-response functions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 277-302.
85. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Erev, I., & Diederich, A. (1997). Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 243-268.
86. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: the effects of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 228-242.
87. Winkler, R. L. (1972). An introduction to Bayesian inference and decision theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
88. Wu, G., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Science, 45, 74-85.
89. Yates, J. F., Price, P. C., Lee, J.-W., & Ramirez, J. (1996). Good probabilistic forecasters: the "consumer's" perspective. International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 41-56.
90. Zeckhauser, R., & Viscusi, W. K. (1990). Risk with reason. Science, 248(4955), 559-564.
91. Zimper, A., & Ludwig, A. (2009). On attitude polarization under Bayesian learning with non-additive beliefs. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 181-212.