Is imprecise knowledge better than conflicting expertise? Evidence from insurers' decisions in the United States

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 211-232

  Cabantous, Laure ^a   Hilton, Denis ^b   Kunreuther, Howard ^c   Michel Kerjan, Erwann ^c  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UTM   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Decision making; Insurance pricing; Source of uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955877413     PISSN: 08955646     EISSN: 15730476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-011-9117-1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., & Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 699-727.
2. Baillon, A., Cabantous, L., & Wakker, P. (2011). Ambiguity and the aggregation of imprecise or conflicting beliefs. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Budescu, D. V., Rantilla, A. K., Yu, H.-T., & Karelitz, Y. M. (2003). The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 178-194.
4. Cabantous, L. (2007). Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers' attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory and Decision, 62, 219-240.
5. Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325-370.
6. Cameron, T. A. (2005). Updating subjective risks in the presence of conflicting information: An application to climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(1), 63.
7. Chew, Y., Katuscak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. (2008). Source preference and ambiguity aversion: Models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. Advances in Health Economics and Health Service Research, 20, 179-201.
8. Cres, H., Gilboa, I., & Vieille, N. (2010). Aggregation of multiple prior opinions. Unpublished manuscript.
9. De Marcellis, N. (2000). Aux frontières de l'assurabilité des risques de l'entreprise, une analyse expérimentale des décisions de l'assureur. Thèse de Doctorat, ENS de Cachan.
10. Dean, M., & Shepherd, R. (2007). Effects of information from sources in conflict and in consensus on perceptions of genetically modified food. Food Quality and Preference, 18(2), 460-469.
11. Du, N., & Budescu, D. V. (2005). The effects of imprecise probabilities and outcomes in evaluating investment options. Management Science, 51(12), 1791.
12. Einhorn, H., & Hogarth, R. M. (1985). Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review, 92, 433-461.
13. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
14. Frisch, D., & Baron, K. (1988). Ambiguity and rationality. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1, 149-157.
15. Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2009). Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information. Unpublished manuscript. Ecole Polytechnique, France. Economics Departement.
16. Gajdos, T., Hayashi, T., Tallon, J.-M., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2008). Attitude toward imprecise information. Journal of Economic Theory, 140, 27-65.
17. Ghirardato, P., & Marinacci, M. (2002). Ambiguity made precise: A comparative foundation. Journal of Economic Theory, 102(2), 251.
18. Gollier, C. (2007). Whom should we believe? Aggregation of heterogeneous beliefs? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35(2), 107-127.
19. Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4, 5-28.
20. Hey, J. D., Lotito, G., & Maffioletti, A. (2010). The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(2), 81.
21. Hilton, D. J. (2007). Causal explanation: From social perception to knowledge-based attribution. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
22. Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93(1), 75-88.
23. Hilton, D. J., Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (1995). Processes of causal explanation and dispositional attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 377-387.
24. Ho, J. L. Y., Keller, L. R., & Keltyka, P. (2002). Effects of outcome and probabilistic ambiguity on managerial choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 47.
25. Ho, J. L. Y., Keller, L. R., & Keltyka, P. (2005). How do information ambiguity and timing of contextual information affect managers' goal congruence in making investment decisions in good times vs. bad times? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31(2), 163.
26. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1990). Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science, 36(7), 780-803.
27. Hogarth, R. M., & Kunreuther, H. (1989). Risk, ambiguity, and insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(1), 5-35.
28. Jaffee, D., Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2010). Long term property insurance. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 29, 167-188.
29. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. The American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.
30. Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., & Mukerji, S. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73(6), 1849.
31. Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E. (2009). At War with the Weather. Cambridge: MIT Press.
32. Kunreuther, H., Meszaros, J., Hogarth, R. M., & Spranca, M. (1995). Ambiguity and underwriter decision processes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 26(3), 337-352.
33. Levy, I., Snell, J., Nelson, A. J., Rustichini, A., & Glimcher, P. W. (2010). The neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1036-1047.
34. Machina, M. J. (2009). Risk, ambiguity and the rank-dependence axioms. The American Economic Review, 99, 385-392.
35. McClure, J. L., Allen, M. W., & Walkey, F. H. (2001). Countering fatalism: Causal information in news reports affects judgments about earthquake damage. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 109-121.
36. Michel-Kerjan, E. (2010). Catastrophe economics: The National Flood Insurance Program. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(4), 165-186.
37. Mukerji, S. (2003). Risk, ambiguity and decision. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F187.
38. Neilson, W. S. (2010). A simplified axiomatic approach to ambiguity aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(2), 113.
39. Rubaltelli, E., Rumiati, R., & Slovic, P. (2010). Do ambiguity avoidance and the comparative ignorance hypothesis depend on people's affective reactions? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(3), 243.
40. Seo, K. (2009). Ambiguity and second-order beliefs. Econometrica, 77, 1575-1605.
41. Shanteau, J. (2001). What does it mean when experts disagree? In E. Salas & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. N. J.: Erlbaum.
42. Smithson, M. (1999). Conflict aversion: Preference for ambiguity vs. conflict in sources and evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 179-198.
43. Snow, A. (2010). Ambiguity and the value of information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(2), 133.
44. Taylor, K. (1995). Testing credit and blame attributions as explanation for choices under ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 128-137.
45. Viscusi, W. K. (1997). Alarmist decisions with divergent risk information. The Economic Journal, 107, 1657-1670.
46. Viscusi, W. K., & Chesson, H. (1999). Hopes and fears: The conflicting effects of risk ambiguity. Theory and Decision, 47(2), 157-184.
47. Viscusi, W. K., & Magat, W. (1992). Bayesian decisions with ambiguous belief aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 371-387.
48. Weiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 74-84.