Enzymatic hydrolysis of lime-pretreated corn stover and investigation of the HCH-1 Model: Inhibition pattern, degree of inhibition, validity of simplified HCH-1 Model

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 98, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 2969-2977

  O'Dwyer, Jonathan P ^a   Zhu, Li ^b   Granda, Cesar B ^b   Holtzapple, Mark T ^b  

^a Albemarle Corporation   (United States)

^b Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

Enzymatic hydrolysis; Lime pretreatment; Product inhibition

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SUBSTRATES;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; LIME PRETREATMENT; PRODUCT INHIBITION;

ENZYME KINETICS;

BETA GLUCOSIDASE; CALCIUM OXIDE; CELLULASE; CELLULOSOME; GLUCOSE; SUGAR;

BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ENZYME KINETICS; HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SUBSTRATES;

BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DIGESTIBILITY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITION; LIME; MAIZE; MODEL VALIDATION; PLANT RESIDUE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CORN; DIGESTION; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME INHIBITION; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HCH 1 MODEL; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITION KINETICS; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRICHODERMA REESEI; VALIDITY;

BIOMASS; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULASE; ETHANOL; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OXIDES; TRICHODERMA; ZEA MAYS;

HYPOCREA JECORINA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 34247108736     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beltrame P., Carniti P., Focher B., Marzetti A., and Sarto V. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials - kinetic study. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (1984) 1233-1238
2. Chang, S., 1999. Lime pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
3. Chang S., and Holtzapple M. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. (2000) 5-37
4. Coward-Kelly G., Aiello-Mazzari C., Kim S., Granda C., and Holtzapple M. Suggested improvements to the standard filter paper assay used to measure cellulase activity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82 (2003) 745-749
5. Desai S.G., and Converse A.O. Substrate reactivity as a function of the extent of reaction in the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 56 (1997) 650-655
6. Dwivedi C., and Ghose J. Model on hydrolysis of bagasse cellulose by enzyme from Trichoderma reesei QM-9414. J. Ferment. Technol. 57 (1979) 15-24
7. Eriksson T., Karlsson J., and Tjerneld F. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 101 (2002) 41-60
8. Fan L., Lee Y., and Breadmore D. The influence of major structural features of cellulose on rate of enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23 (1981) 419-424
9. Gama F., Teixeira J., and Mota M. Cellulose morphology and enzymatic reactivity: a modified solute exclusion technique. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43 (1994) 381-387
10. Ghose T., and Ghosh P. Bioconversion of cellulosic substances. J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 28 (1978) 309-320
11. Gonzalez G., Caminal G., de Mas C., and Lopez-Santin J. A kinetic model for pretreated wheat straw saccharification by cellulase. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 44 (1989) 275-288
12. Holtzapple M., Caram H., and Humphrey A. The HCH-1 model of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (1984) 775-780
13. Holtzapple M., Cognata M., Shu Y., and Hendrickson C. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 36 (1990) 275-287
14. Holtzapple M., Ripley E., and Nikolaou M. Saccharification, fermentation, and protein recovery from low-temperature AFEX-treated coastal bermudagrass. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44 (1994) 1122-1131
15. Huang A. Kinetic studies on insoluble cellulose-cellulase system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17 (1975) 1421-1433
16. Huang X., and Penner M. Apparent substrate inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulase system. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39 (1991) 2096-2100
17. Kadam, K.L., Camobreco, V., Glazebrook, B., Forrest, L., Jacobson, W., Simerith, D., Blackburn, W., Nehoda, K., 1999. Environmental life cycle implications of fuel oxygenates production from California biomass. NREL/TP-580-25688: Golden, CO.
18. Klyosov A. Trends in biochemistry and enzymology of cellulose degradation. Biochemistry 29 (1990) 10577-10585
19. Lenz J., Esterbauer H., Sattler W., Schurz J., and Wrentschur E. Changes of structure and morphology of regenerated cellulose caused by acid and enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Appl. Sci. 41 (1990) 1315-1326
20. Lynd L., Elander R., and Wyman C. Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 57/58 (1996) 741-761
21. Lynd L., Cushman J., Nichols R., and Wyman C. Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Science 251 (1991) 1318-1323
22. Lynd L., Weimer P., Van Zyl W., and Pretorius I. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002) 506-577
23. Mandels M., Medeiros J., Andreotti R., and Bissett F. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: evaluation of cellulase culture filtrates under use conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23 (1981) 2009-2026
24. Mansfield S., Mooney C., and Saddler J. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Prog. 15 (1999) 804-816
25. Medve J., Karlsson J., Lee D., and Tjerneld F. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 59 (1998) 621-633
26. Miller G. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 31 (1959) 426-428
27. Movagarnejad K., Sohrabi M., Kaghazchi T., and Vahabzadeh F. A model for the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in heterogeneous solid-liquid systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 4 (2000) 197-206
28. NREL, 2004. Technical Report. Biomass analysis technology team laboratory analytical procedure. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
29. Ohmine K., Ooshima H., and Harano Y. Study on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulase from Trichoderma viride. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25 (1983) 2041-2053
30. Puls J., and Wood T. The degradation pattern of cellulose by extracellular cellulases of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Bioresource Technol. 36 (1991) 15-19
31. Scheiding W., Thoma M., Ross A., and Schugerl K. Modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis cellobiose and cellulose by a complex enzyme mixture of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20 (1984) 176-182
32. Schou C., Rasmussen G., Katoft M.B., Henrissat B., and Schulein M. Stereochemistry, specificity, and kinetics of the hydrolysis of reduced cellodextrins by nine cellulases. Eur. J. Biochem. FEBS 217 (1993) 947-953
33. Segal L., Creely J., Martin A., and Conrad C. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Res. J. 29 (1959) 786-794
34. Tarantili P., Koullas D., Christakopoulos P., Kekos D., Koukios E., and Macris B. Cross-synergism in enzymatic hydrolysis of lingocellulosics: mathematical correlations according to a hyperbolic model. Biomass Bioenergy 10 (1996) 213-219
35. Van Wyk J. Biotechnology and the utilization of biowaste as a resource for bioproduct development. Trends Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 172-177
36. Wald S., Wilke C., and Blanch H. Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (1984) 221-230
37. Zhang S., Wolfgang D., and Wilson D. Substrate heterogeneity causes the nonlinear kinetics of insoluble cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 66 (1999) 35-41