D 1 receptor activation improves vigilance in rats as measured by the 5-choice continuous performance test

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 220, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 129-141

  Barnes, Samuel A ^a   Young, Jared W ^b   Neill, Jo C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

5 Choice Continuous Performance Test (5 C CPT); Attention; D 1 Agonist; Dopamine; Schizophrenia; Vigilance

Indexed keywords

2,3,4,5 TETRAHYDRO 7,8 DIHYDROXY 1 PHENYL 1H 3 BENZAZEPINE; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR;

ALERTNESS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC ACTIVITY; DOPAMINERGIC TRANSMISSION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; MENTAL TEST; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SIGNAL DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

2,3,4,5-TETRAHYDRO-7,8-DIHYDROXY-1-PHENYL-1H-3-BENZAZEPINE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COGNITION; DOPAMINE AGONISTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; RATS; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1;

EID: 84858442713     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: 14322072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2460-8     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Amitai N, Semenova S, Markou A (2007) Cognitive disruptive effects of the psychotomimetic phencyclidine and attenuation by atypical antipsychotic medication in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 193:521-537 (Pubitemid 47094377)
2. Amitai N, Markou A (2009) Chronic nicotine improves cognitive performance in a test of attention but does not attenuate cognitive disruption induced by repeated phencyclidine administration. Psychopharmacology 202:275-286
3. Arnsten AFT, Cai JX, Murphy JL, Goldman-Rakic PS (1994) Dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms in the cognitive performance of young and aged monkeys. Psychopharmacology 116:143-151 (Pubitemid 24317040)
4. Bari A, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2008) The application of the 5-choice serial reaction time task for the assessment of visual attentional processes and impulse control in rats. Nat Protocols 3 (5):759-767 (Pubitemid 351639020)
5. Broadbent DE (1971) Decision and stress. Academic Press, London
6. Carli M, Robbins TW, Evended JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats. Implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9:361-380 (Pubitemid 13002330)
7. Chen WJ, Faraone SV (2000) Sustained attention deficits as markers of genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet 97:52-57 (Pubitemid 30257326)
8. Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D (1993) A theory of dopamine function and its role in cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 19(1):85-104 (Pubitemid 23073557)
9. Collings RD (2003) Differences between ADHD inattentive and combined types on the CPT. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 25:177-189 (Pubitemid 36687529)
10. Cornblatt BA, Keilp JG (1994) Impaired attention, genetics, and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 20(1):31-46 (Pubitemid 24071091)
11. Diamond DM, Campbell AM, Park CR, Halonen J, Zoladz PR (2007) The temporal dynamics model of emotional memory processing: A synthesis on the neurobiological basis of stress-induced amnesia, flashbulb and traumatic memories and the Yerkes- Dodson law. Neural Plast. doi:10.1155/2007/60803 (Pubitemid 46629680)
12. Dudchenko P, Paul B, Sarter M (1992) Dissociation between the effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists on behavioural vigilances and responsivity. Psychopharmacology 109:203-211
13. Eagle DM, Bari A, Robbins TW (2008) The neuropsychopharmacol-ogy of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology 199:439-456
14. Egeland J, Johansen SN, Ueland T (2009) Differentiating between ADHD sub-types on CCPT measures of sustained attention and vigilance. Scand J Psychol 50:347-354
15. Fletcher PJ, Tenn CC, Sinyard J, Rizos Z, Kapur S (2007) A sensitizing regime of amphetamine impairs visual attention in the 5-choice serial reaction time test: reversal by a D1 receptor agonist injected into the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsycho-pharmacology 32:1122-1132 (Pubitemid 46631980)
16. Frey PW, Colliver JA (1973) Sensitivity and responsibility measures for discrimination learning. Learn Motivation 4:327-342
17. 1 receptor in schizophrenia: insights for cognitive dysfunction. Psychopharmacology 174:3-16 (Pubitemid 38925085)
18. Granon S, Passetti F, Thomas KL, Dalley JW, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2000) Enhanced and impaired attentional performance after infusion of D1 dopaminergic receptor agents into rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 20(3):1208-1215 (Pubitemid 30220477)
19. Green MF (1996) What are the functional consequences of neuro-cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 153(3):321-330 (Pubitemid 26074706)
20. Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK (2004) Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: Implications for MATRICS. Schizophrenia Research. 72: 41-51. (Pubitemid 39452904)
21. Hahn B, Shoaib M, Stolerman IP (2002) Nicotine-induced enhancement of attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: the influence of task demands. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 162:129-137 (Pubitemid 34743952)
22. Hersi AI, Rowe W, Gaudreau P, Quirion R (1995) Dopamine D1 receptor ligands modulate cognitive performance and hippocam-pal acetylcholine release in memory-impaired aged rats. Neuroscience 69:1067-1074 (Pubitemid 3002650)
23. Kornetsky C, Mirtsky AF (1966) On certain psychopharmacological and physiological differences between schizophrenics and normal persons. Psychoparmacologia 8:309-318
24. Kumar CTS, Christodoulou T, Vyas NS, Kyriakopoulos M, Corrigall R (2010) Deficits in visual sustained attention differentiate genetic liability and disease expression for schizophrenia from bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res 124:152-160
25. Lam CM, Beale IL (1991) Relations among sustained attention, reading performances, and teachers' ratings of behaviour problems. Remedial Spec Educ (RASE) 12:40-47
26. Leonard JA (1959) 5 choice serial reaction apparatus. Anonymous, Med. Res. Council Appl. Psychol. Res. Unit. Rep., Great Britain
27. Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action if central nervous system stimulant drugs. A general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman W (ed) Current developments in psychophar-macology. Spectrum, New York
28. Mackworth NH (1950) Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council Special Report Series. 268. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London
29. Mackworth NH (1957) Some factors affecting vigilance. Adv Sci 53:389-393
30. Marder SR, Fenton W (2004) Measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia: NIMH MATRICS initiative to support the development of agents for improving cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 72:5-9 (Pubitemid 39452900)
31. Marder SR, Fenton W, Youens K (2004) Schizophrenia, IX: Cognition in schizophrenia - the MATRICS initiative. Am J Psychiatry 161 (1):25 (Pubitemid 38419303)
32. Marston HM (1996) Analysis of cognitive function in animals, the value of SDT. Cogn Brain Res 3:269-277 (Pubitemid 26198358)
33. McGaughy J, Sarter M (1995) Behavioural vigilance in rats: task validation and effects of age, amphetamine, and benzodiazepine receptor ligands. Psychopharmacology 117:340-357
34. 1-like receptor activation improves PCP-induced cognitive deficits in animal models: implications for mechanisms of improved cognitive function in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 19:440-450
35. Muir JL, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1996) The cerebral cortex of the rat brain and visual attentional function: Dissociable effects of mediofrontal, cingulate, anterior dorsolateral, and parietal cortex lesions on a five-choice serial reaction time task. Cereb Cortex 6:470-481
36. Navarra R, Graf R, Huang Y, Logue S, Comery T, Hughes Z, Day M (2008) Effects of atomoxetine and methyphenidate on attention and impulsivity in the 5 choice serial reaction time test. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:43-41
37. Nestor PG, Faux SF, McCarley RW, Shenton ME, Sands SF (1990) Measurement of visual sustained attention in schizophrenia using signal detection analysis and a newly developed computerized CPT task. Schizophr Res 3:329-332 (Pubitemid 20383968)
38. Neumeyer JL, Kula NS, Bergman J, Baldessarini RJ (2003) Receptor affinities of dopamine D1 receptor-selective novel phenylbenza-zepines. Eur J Pharmacol 474:137-140 (Pubitemid 37281441)
39. Nieoullon A (2002) Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention. Prog Neurobiol 67:53-83 (Pubitemid 34786170)
40. Parasuraman R (1998) The attentive brain. A Bradford book. The MIT Press
41. Paine TA, Carlezon WA Jr (2009) Effects of antipsychotic drugs on MK-801-induced attentional and motivational deficits in rats. Neuropharmacology 56:788-797
42. 2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens in attentional performance on the five-choice serial reaction time task. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:273-283 (Pubitemid 46106934)
43. 2C adrenergic receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 19 (2):138-146
44. 2 dopamine receptor ligands. Bioorg Med Chem 11:1451-1464 (Pubitemid 36293539)
45. Riccio CA, Reynolds CE, Lowe MJJ (2002) The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates for attention? Arch Clin Neuropsychol 17:235-272 (Pubitemid 34201745)
46. Robbins TW (1998) Arousal and Attention: Pyschopharmacological and neuropsychological studies in experimental animals. In: Parasuraman R (ed) The attentive brain. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 189-219
47. Robbins TW (2002) The 5-choice serial time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacol-ogy 163:362-380
48. Rosvold H, Mirsky A, Sarason I, Bransome ED Jr, Beck LH (1956) A continuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 20:343-350
49. Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP (2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev 35:146-160 (Pubitemid 32411470)
50. Sawaguchi T, Goldman-Rakic PS (1991) D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex: Involvement in working memory. Science 22:947-950 (Pubitemid 21926192)
51. 1-dopamine receptor in working memory: local injections of dopamine antagonists into the prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkeys performing an oculomotor delayed-response task. J Neurophysiol 71:515-528 (Pubitemid 24068583)
52. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods, 8th edn. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, pp 226-228
53. Spratt C, Marston HM, Sharkey J, Kelly JS (2000) Comparison of rat and mouse attentional performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task. BNA 17: 49.03
54. Steckler T (2001) Using signal detection methods for analysis of operant performance in mice. Behav Brain Res 125:237-248 (Pubitemid 33000462)
55. Tamminga CA (2006) The neurobiology of cognition in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 67(9):9-13 (Pubitemid 44369649)
56. Tomasi D, Volkow ND, Wang R, Telang F, Wang GJ, Chang L, Ernst T, Fowler JS (2010) Dopamine transporters in striatum correlate with deactivation in the default mode network during visuospatial attention. PLoS One 4(6):e6102
57. Vijayraghavan S, Wang M, Birnbaum SG, Williams GV, Arnsten AFT (2007) Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory. Nat Neurosci 10(3):376-384
58. Warm JS, Dember WN (1987) Test of vigilance taxonomy.
59. Parasura-man R, Warm JS, Dember WN (1987) Vigilance: taxonomy and utility. In: Mark LS, Warm JS, Huston RL (eds) Ergonomics and human factors. Springer, New York
60. Warm JS, Dember WN (1998) Tests of vigilance taxonomy. In: Hoffman RR, Sherrick MF, Warm JS (eds) Viewing psychology as a whole: The integrative science of William N Dember. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 87-112
61. Wilkinson RT (1963) Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. J Exp Psychol 66:332-337
62. Wohlberg GW, Kornetsky C (1973) Sustained attention in remitted schizophrenics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 28:533-537
63. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18(5):459-482
64. Young JW, Powell SB, Risbrough V, Marston HM, Geyer MA (2009a) Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia. Pharmacol Ther 122:150-202
65. Young JW, Light GA, Marston HM, Sharp R, Geyer MA (2009b) The 5-Choice performance test: Evidence for a translational test of vigilance for mice. PLoS One 4(1):e4227
66. Young JW, Powell SB, Scott CN, Zhou X, Geyer MA (2011) The effect of reduced dopamine D4 receptor expression in the 5-choice continuous performance task: separating response inhibition from premature responding. Behav Brain Res. doi:10.1016/j. bbr.2011.03.054
67. Zahrt J, Taylor JR, Mathew RG, Arnsten AF (1997) Supranormal stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors in the rodent prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance. J Neurosci 17:8528-8535 (Pubitemid 27461074)