A dynamic traffic assignment model for highly congested urban networks

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 24, Issue , 2012, Pages 62-82

  Ben Akiva, Moshe E ^a   Gao, Song ^b   Wei, Zheng ^c   Wen, Yang ^d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts   (United States)

^c CALIPER CORPORATION   (United States)

^d GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic traffic assignment; Highly congested; Lane groups; Mesoscopic traffic simulation; Non motorized traffic; Path size Logit; Short links

Indexed keywords

SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES; TRAVEL TIME;

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS; HIGHLY CONGESTED; LANE GROUPS; MESOSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION; NON-MOTORIZED TRAFFICS; PATH SIZES; SHORT LINKS;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

CALIBRATION; CYCLE TRANSPORT; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MODELING; NETWORK DESIGN; PEDESTRIAN; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRAVEL TIME; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84858321308     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aerde, M.V., Hellinga, B., Baker, M., Rakha, H., 1996. INTEGRATION: An Overview of Current Simulation Features. Transportation Research Board 75th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC, January 7-11.
2. Ashok K., Ben-Akiva M. Estimation and prediction of time-dependent origin-destination flows with a stochastic mapping to path flows and link flows. Transportation Science 2002, 36(2):184-198.
3. Balakrishna, R., 2006. Off-line Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
4. Balakrishna, R., Koutsopoulos, H., Ben-Akiva, M., 2006. Simultaneous Off-line Demand and Supply Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Systems. Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC, January 22-26.
5. Balakrishna R., Y W., Ben-Akiva M., Antoniou C. Simulation-based framework for transportation network management for emergencies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2041:80-88.
6. Barcelo J., Casas J. Dynamic Network Simulation with AIMSUN. International Symposium Proceedings on Transport Simulation, Yokohama 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Barcelo, J., Casas, J., 2002b. Heuristic dynamic assignment based on microscopic simulation. In: Proceedings of the 9th Meeting of the Euro Working Group on Transportation. Bari, Italy, June 10-13.
8. Barcelo J., Casas J. Stochastic heuristic dynamic assignment based on AIMSUN microscopic traffic simulator. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1964:70-80.
9. Bekhor S., Ben-Akiva M., Ramming M. Adaptation of logit kernel to route choice situation. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1805:78-85.
10. Ben-Akiva M., Bierlaire M. Discrete choice models with applications to departure time and route choice. Handbook of Transportation Science 2003, 7-37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. second ed.
11. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
12. Ben-Akiva, M., Ramming, S., 1998. Lecture Notes: Discrete choice Models of Traveler Behavior in Networks. Capri, Italy.
13. Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Bottom, J., Koutsopoulos, H.N., Mishalani, R.G., 1997. Development of a route guidance generation system for real-time application. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Federation of Automatic Control Symposium on Transportation Systems. Chania, Greece.
14. Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Koutosopoulos, H., Mishalani, R., 1998. DynaMIT: A simulation-Based System for Traffic Prediction and Guidance Generation. TRISTAN III. San Juan, Porto Rico, June 17-23.
15. Ben-Akiva M., Bierlaire M., Burton D., Koutsopoulos H.N., Mishalani R. Network state estimation and prediction for real-time transportation management applications. Networks and Spatial Economics 2001, 1(3/4):291-318.
16. Ben-Akiva M., Bierlaire M., Koutsopoulos H.N., Mishalani R. Real-time simulation of traffic demand-supply interactions within DynaMIT. Transportation and Network Analysis: Current Trends: Miscellanea in Honor of Michael Florian 2002, 19-36. Kluwer Academic Publishers. M. Gendreau, P. Marcotte (Eds.).
17. Ben-Akiva M., Ramming M.S., Bekhor S. Route choice models. Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks 2004, 23-45. Springer, New York. M. Schreckenberg, R. Selten (Eds.).
18. Caliper Corporation, 2009. A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks. TRB Planning Application Conference, Houston, TX, May 20.
19. Cascetta E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, MA.
20. Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., Vitetta, A., 1996. A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Lyon, France, July 24-26.
21. Chiu, Y.-C., Villalobos, J.A., 2008. The anisotropic mesoscopic simulation model on the interrupted highway facilities. In: TRB Symposium on the Fundamental Diagram: 75Years Later (Greenshields 75 Symposium). Woods Hole, MA, July 8-10.
22. Chiu Y.C., Zheng H., Villalobos J.A., Peacock W., Henk R. Evaluating regional contra-flow and phased evacuation strategies for Texas using a large-scale dynamic traffic simulation and assignment approach. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2008, 5(1). (Article 34).
23. Daganzo C. Multinomial probit and qualitative choice: a computationally efficient algorithm. Transportation Science 1977, 11:338-358.
24. de Palma A., Marchal F. Real cases applications of the fully dynamic METROPOLIS tool-box: an advocacy for large-scale mesoscopic transportation systems. Networks and Spatial Economics 2002, 2:347-369.
25. Florian, M., Mahut, M., Tremblay, N., 2001. A hybrid optimization-mesoscopic simulation dynamic traffic assignment model. In: Proceeding of the International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Oakland, CA, August 25-29, pp. 118-121.
26. Florian M., Mahut M., Tremblay N. Application of a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model. Simulation Approaches in Transportation Analysis: Recent Advances and Challenges 2005, 1-22. Springer, New York. R. Kitamura, M. Kuwahara (Eds.).
27. Florian, M., Mahut, M., Tremblay, N. 2006. A simulation based dynamic traffic assignment: the model, solution algorithm and applications. In: International Symposium of Transport Simulation 2006, ISTS06 Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
28. Frejinger E., Bierlaire M. Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41:363-378.
29. Hughes J.T. AIMSUN2 Simulation of a Congested Auckland Freeway. Transportation Planning: State of the Art 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers. M. Patriksson, M. Labbé (Eds.).
30. Kunde, K.K., 2002. Calibration of Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Models for Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
31. Liu, Y., Yu, J., Chang, G.-L., Rahwanji, S., 2008. A lane-group based macroscopic model for signalized intersections account for shared lanes and blockages. In: Proceedings of the 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Beijing, China, October 12-15, pp. 639-644.
32. Mahmassani H.S. Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications. Networks and Spatial Economics 2001, 1(3/4):267-292.
33. Mahmassani, H.S., Hawas, Y., 1997. Data requirements for development, calibration of dynamic traffic models, and algorithms for ATMS/ATIS. In: Proceedings of the 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
34. Mahmassani, H., Qin, X., Zhou, X., 2004. DYNASMART-X Evaluation for Realtime TMC Application: Irvine Test Bed: TrEPS Phase 1.5b Final Report. Technical Report. Maryland Transportation Initiative, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
35. Mahut, M., 2001. A multi-lane link model of traffic dynamics based on the "spacetime" queue. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Oakland, CA, August 25-29, pp. 122-126.
36. Mahut M., Florian M., Tremblay N., Campbell M., Patman D., McDaniel Z.K. Calibration and application of a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004, 1876:101-111.
37. Peeta S., Ziliaskopoulos A.K. Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Networks and Spatial Economics 2001, 1:233-265.
38. Pindyck R., Rubinfeld D.L. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts 1997, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA. fourth ed.
39. Ramming, M.S., 2002. Network Knowledge and Route Choice. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA.
40. Rathi, V., Antoniou, C., Wen, Y., Ben-Akiva, M., Cusack, M., 2008. Assessment of the Impact of Dynamic Prediction-based Route Guidance using a Simulation-based, Closed-loop Framework. The Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC, January 13-17.
41. Spall J.C. Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1992, 37:332-341.
42. Spall J.C. Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic approximation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 1998, 34:817-823.
43. Spall J.C. Stochastic optimization, stochastic approximation and simulated annealing. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 1999, 529-542. Wiley-Interscience. J.G. Webster (Ed.).
44. Taylor N.B. The CONTRAM dynamic traffic assignment model. Networks and Spatial Economics 2003, 3(3):297-322.
45. Transportation Research Board, 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, DC.
46. Vovsha P., Bekhor S. Link-nested logit model of route choice overcoming route overlapping problem. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1645:133-142.
47. Wei, Z., 2010. Critical Enhancements of a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model for Highly Congested. Complex Urban Network. Master's Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA.
48. Wen, Y., 2009. Scalability of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
49. Wen Y., Balakrishna R., Ben-Akiva M., Smith S. Online deployment of dynamic traffic assignment: architecture and run-time management. IEE Proceedings Intelligent Transport Systems (now IET Intelligent Transport Systems) 2006, 153(1):76-84.
50. Wen, Y., Balakrishna, R., Gupta, A., Ben-Akiva, M., Smith, S., 2006b. Deployment of DynaMIT in the City of Los Angeles. Technical Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
51. Yai T., Iwakura S., Morichi S. Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transportation Research Part B 1997, 31(3):195-207.
52. Ziliaskopoulos A., Waller S., Li Y., Byram M. Large-scale dynamic traffic assignment: implementation issues and computational analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2004, 130(5):585-593.