Simulation-based framework for transportation network management in emergencies

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2041, 2008, Pages 80-88

  Balakrishna, Ramachandran ^a   Wen, Yang ^b   Ben Akiva, Moshe ^b   Antoniou, Constantinos ^c  

^a CALIPER CORPORATION   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EMERGENCY TRAFFIC CONTROL; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

CONDITION; DECISION SUPPORTS; DYNAMIC TRAFFIC; EMERGENCY CONDITIONS; EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTERS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK MANAGEMENT;

NETWORK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 50849100726     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2041-09     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Shepherd, K. E., M. E. Baird, M. D. Abkowitz, and F. Wegmann. Transportation and Emergency Services: Identifying Critical Interfaces, Obstacles, and Opportunities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1959, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 55-64.
2. Dertouzos, M. Unfinished Revolution: Human-Centered Computers and What They Can Do for Us. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 2001.
3. Lively, D., O. Elhamshary, and B. Tournay. Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Overview of California's System Application and Its Performance as Part of Emergency Response Planning. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
4. Ullman, B. R., C. L. Dudek, and N. D. Trout. Amber Alert and Major Catastrophe Messages on Dynamic Message Signs: Focus Group Studies in Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1959, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 114-121.
5. Zografos, K. G., and K. N. Androutsopoulos. Decision Support System for Hazardous Materials Transportation and Emergency Response Management. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
6. Elmitiny, N., S. Ramasamy, and E. Radwan. Transit Facilities' Emergency Evacuation Planning and Preparedness Using Traffic Simulation. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2007.
7. Chen, X., and F. B. Zhan. Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation of Urban Evacuation: Relative Effectiveness of Simultaneous and Staged Evacuation Strategies. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
8. Liu, Y., X. Lai, G.-L.Chang. Cell-Based Network Optimization Model for Staged Evacuation Planning Under Emergencies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 127-135.
9. Bronzini, M. S., and R. Kicinger. Conceptual Model of a Self-Organizing Traffic Management hazard Response System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1942. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1-8.
10. Chiu, Y.-C., P. K. Rao, and P. B. Mirchandani. Dynamic Traffic Management for Evacuation. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
11. Liu, H. X., J. X. Ban, W. Ma, and P. B. Mirchandani. Model Reference Adaptive Control Framework for Real-Time Traffic Management Under Emergency Evacuation. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
12. Jha, M., K. Moore, and B. Pushaie. Emergency Evacuation Planning with Microscopic Traffic Simulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1886, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 40-48.
13. Pal, A., A. J. Graettinger, and M. H. Triche. Emergency Evacuation Modeling Based on Geographic Information System Data. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
14. Laefer, D. F., and A. R. Pradhan. (US-Based Disaster Management Systems: Cogent Data Framework. In 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
15. Wilmot, C. G., and N. Meduri. Methodology to Establish Hurricane Evacuation Zones, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 129-137.
16. Han, L. D. Evacuation Modeling and Operations Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Most Desirable Destination Approaches. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
17. Kwon, E., and S. Pitt. Evaluation of Emergency Evacuation Strategies for Downtown Event Traffic Using a Dynamic Network Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1922. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 149-155.
18. Alsnih, R., and P. R. Stopher. Review of the Procedures Associated with Devising Emergency Evacuation Plans. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1865, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 89-97.
19. Radwan, E., and S. Mitchell. Heuristic Priority Ranking of Emergency Evacuation Staging to Reduce Clearance Time. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 219-228.
20. Yuan, F., L. D. Tian, S.-M. Chin, and H. Hwang. Proposed Framework for Simultaneous Optimization of Evacuation Traffic Destination and Route Assignment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 50-58.
21. Shayti, H., and H. S. Mahmassani. Optimal Scheduling of Evacuation Operations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington. D.C., 2006, pp. 238-246.
22. Liu, Y., X. Lai, and G.-L. Chang. Two-Level Integrated Optimization Model for Planning of Emergency Evacuation: Case Study of Ocean City, Maryland, Under Hurricane Evacuation. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
23. Lu. Q., Y. Huang, and S. Shekhar. Evacuation Planning: A Capacity Constrained Routing Approach. Proc., First NSF/NIJ Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI 2003), Tucson, Arizona, University of Arizona, Tucson, 2003.
24. Wolshon, B. Design of Reversible Roadway Entry and Termination Points: Comparative Review of State of the Practice. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
25. Wolshon, B., and G. Theodoulou. Modeling and Analyses of Freeway Contraflow to Improve Future Evacuations. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
26. Lim, E., and B. Wolshon. Modeling and Performance Assessment of Contrallow Evacuation Termination Points, In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1922, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 118-128.
27. Tuydes, H., and A. Ziliaskopoulos. Network Redesign to Optimize Evacuation Contraflow. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington. D.C., 2004.
28. Tuydes, H., and A. Ziliaskopoulos. Tabu-Based Heuristic Approach for Optimization of Network Evacuation Contrallow. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 157-168.
29. Shekhar, S., and S. Kim. Contraflow Transportation Network Reconfiguration for Evacuation Route Planning. Report MN/RC-2006-21. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota. 2006. www.lrrb.org/PDF/200621.pdf. Accessed March 14, 2008.
30. Orbay, K., and A. M. Yazici. Reliability of Evacuation Performance Measures with Respect to Demand and Capacity Uncertainties. Proc., Third International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR2007), Delft, Netherlands. Delft University of Technology, 2007.
31. Patel, R. K. Improved Managed Lanes Framework for Emergency Management. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2006.
32. Stopher, P. R., R. Alsnih, and J. Rose. Developing Decision Support System for Emergency Evacuation: Case Study of Bush Fires. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2005.
33. Fu, H., and C. G. Wilmot. Static versus Dynamic and Aggregate versus Disaggregate: Comparison Between Practice and Research in Hurricane Evacuation Travel Demand Modeling. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
34. Fu, H., and C. G. Wilmot. Sequential Logit Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Hurricane Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1882, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 19-26.
35. Fu, H. C. G. Wilmot, H. Zhang, and E. J. Baker. Modeling the hurricane Evacuation Response Curve. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2022, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 94-102.
36. Murray-Tuite, P. M., and H. S. Mahmassani. Model of Household Trip-Chain Sequencing in Emergency Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 21-29.
37. Murray-Tuite, P. M., and H. S. Mahmassani. Methodology for the Determining Vulnerable Links in a Transportation Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1882, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 88-96.
38. Henson, K. M., and K. G. Goulias. Preliminary Assessment of Activity and Modeling for Homeland Security Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1942, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 23-30.
39. Wilmot, C. G., and B. Mei. Comparison of Alternative Trip Generation Models for Hurricane Evacuation. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 2003.
40. Ozbay, K., M. A. Yazici, and S. I.-J. Chien. Study of the Networkwide Impact of Various Demand Generation Methods Linder Hurricane Evacuation Conditions. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
41. Fu, H., and C. G. Wilmot, Survival Analysis-Based Dynamic Travel Demand Models for Hurricane Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1964. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 211-218.
42. Integrated Incident Management Systems. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany. www.dot.state.ny.us/reg/r11/iims/index.html. Accessed March 14, 2008.
43. Ben-Akiva, M., M. Bierlaire, H. N. Koutsopoulos, and R. Mishalani. Real-Time Simulation of Traffic Demand-Supply Interactions Within DynaMIT. In Transportation and Network Analysis: Current Trends (Miscellenea in Honor of Michael Florian) (M. Gendreau and P. Marcotte, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. Netherlands, 2002, pp. 19-36.
44. Mahmassani, H. S. Dynamic Network Traffic Assignment and Simulation Methodology for Advanced System Management Applications. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2001, pp. 267-292.
45. Wen, Y., R. Balakrishna, M. Ben-Akiva, and S. Smith. Online Deployment of Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Architecture and Run-Time Management. IEEE Proceedings Intelligent Transport Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Vol. 153, No. I, 2006, pp. 76-84.
46. Wen, Y., R. Balakrishna, M. E. Ben-Akiva, and S. Smith. Online Deployment of Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Evaluation and Lessons. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.