Testing, assessment and literacy learning in schools: A view from England

Curriculum Perspectives

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 77-81

  Wearmouth, Janice ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858299762     PISSN: 01597868     EISSN: 23671793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adnett, N. & Davies, P. (2001, September). Schooling reforms in England: From quasi-markets to competition? Paper presented at the Quasi-Markets and Social Services workshop, Louvain-laNeuve, UCL.
2. Chall, J. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Curtis, P. (2007, 29 November). England plunges in rankings for reading. Guardian. Retrieved 7 June 2008 from www. guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/nov/29/schools.booksnews
4. Department for Children, Families and Schools (DCFS). (2008). The standards site: Welcome to the phonics website, Retrieved 10 June 2008 from http://www.standards.dcsf. gov.uk/phonics/
5. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1997a). Excellence in schools. London: Author.
6. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). Framework for teaching. London: Author.
7. Flesche, R. (1955). Why Johnny can't read - and what you can do about it. New York: Harper.
8. Flude, M. & Hammer, M. (1990). The Education Reform Act 1988. London: Falmer.
9. SFS Group. (2008). SFS Group: News. Retrieved 16 June 2008 from http://www.sfs-group.co.uk/news-archive-may-2008. htm
10. Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), pp. 126-135.
11. Goodman, K. (1986). What's whole in whole-language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Goodman, K. (1996). On reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. Hackett, G. (2007, November 15). Literacy standards: Why the facts make good reading. Independent. Retrieved 10 June 2008 from http://www.independent.co.uk/ news/education/schools/literacy-standards-why-the- facts-make-good-reading-400299.html
14. Hall, K. & Øzerk, K. (2008). Research briefing: Primary curriculum and assessment: England and other countries (Primary Review Research Survey 3/1). Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.
15. Hargreaves, D.H. (2002, 13 February). Assessing assessment. Paper presented at the RSA Lecture Programme, London.
16. Heubert, J.P. (2000). High-stakes testing opportunities and risks for students of color, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. New York: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
17. Hilton, M. (2006). Damaging confusions in England's KS2 reading tests: A response to Anne Kispal. Literacy, 40(1), pp. 36-41.
18. Johnson, R. & Watson, J. (2004). Accelerating the development of reading, spelling and phonemic awareness skills in initial readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, pp. 327-357.
19. Literacy Taskforce. (1997). A reading revolution: How we can teach every child to read well. London: Institute of Education.
20. Openshaw, R., Soler, J. & Wearmouth, J. (2002). The sociopolitical context of the development of Reading Recovery in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Curriculum Journal, 13(1), pp. 113-119.
21. Pring, R.A. (1995). Closing the gap: Liberal education and vocational preparation. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
22. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2008). Tests and tasks: National Curriculum Tests. Retrieved 16 June 2008 from http://www.qca.org.uk/default.aspx
23. Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. Nottingham: DfES.
24. House of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee. (2008). Testing and assessment. Third report. London: UK Parliament.
25. House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2005). leaching children to read: Eighth report of session 2004-05. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
26. Soler, J. (2002). Policy contexts and the debates over how to teach literacy, in: Soler, J. Wearmouth & G. Reid (Eds), Contextualising difficulties in literacy development: Exploring politics, culture, ethnicity, ethics (pp. 3-11). London: Routledge.
27. Stierer, B. (2002). Simply doing their job? The politics of reading standards and 'real books', in J. Soler, J. Wearmouth & G. Reid (Eds), Contextual ising difficulties in literacy development: Exploring politics, culture, ethnicity, ethics (pp. 73-82). London: Routledge.
28. Waterland, L. (1985). Read with me. Strand, UK: Thimble Press.
29. Wiliam, D. (2001). Level best? Levels of attainment in national curriculum assessment. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
30. Woodward, W. (2006, 27 December). Thinktank calls for end to national exams for pupils aged 11 and 14. Guardian. Retrieved 7 June 2008 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/ uk_news/story/0,1978715,00.html
31. Wyse, D., McCreery, E. & Torrance, H. (2008). Primary review research briefing: The trajectory and impact of national reform: Curriculum and assessment in English primary education (Primary Review Research Survey 3/2). Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.