Policy contexts and the debates over how to teach literacy

Contextualising Difficulties in Literacy Development: Exploring Politics, Culture, Ethnicity and Ethics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-13

  Soler, Janet ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909640229     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Allington, R. L. and Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999) The Politics of Literacy Teaching: How 'Research' Shaped Educational Policy. Educational Researcher 28(8): 4-12
2. Beard, R. (1999a) Influences on the Literacy Hour. Reading: A Journal about Literacy and Language in Education 33(1): 6-12
3. Beard, R. (1999b) National Literacy Strategy: Review of Research and Other Evidence. Leeds: School of Education, University of Leeds
4. Blackledge, A. (2001) Literacy, Schooling and Ideology in a Multilingual State. The Curriculum Journal, 12(3): 291-312
5. Byers, R. (1999) The National Literacy Strategy and Pupils with Special Educational Needs. British Journal of Special Education, 26(1): 8-11
6. Chall, J. (1967) Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill
7. Clay, M. M. (1985) The Early Detection of Reading Difficulties. Auckland: Heinemann
8. Clay, M. M. (1990) The Reading Recovery Programme, 1984-1988: Coverage, Outcomes and Education Board District Figures. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 25(1): 61-70
9. Clay, M. M. (1994) Reading Recovery: A Guidebook for Teachers in Training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
10. Department for Education and Employment (1998). The National Literacy Strategy: Framework for Teaching. London: DfEE
11. Earl, L., Levin, B., Leithwood, K., Fullan, M., Watson, N., et al. (2000) Watching and Learning: OISEIUT Evaluation of the Implementation of the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies, Summary: First Annual Report, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. London: DfES
12. Flesch, R. F. (1955) Why Johnny Can't Read-And What You Can Do About It ([1st] edn). New York: Harper
13. Goodman, K. S. (1986) What's Whole in Whole Language? (1st US edn). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
14. Goodman, K. S. (1998) In Defense of Good Teaching: What Teachers Need to Know About the 'Reading Wars'. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers
15. Hancock, R. and Mansfield, M. (2002) The Literacy Hour: A Case for Listening to Children. The Curriculum Journal 13(1): 209-260
16. Literacy Taskforce (1997) A Reading Revolution: How We Can Teach Every Child to Read WelL London: Institute of Education, University of London. http://www. leeds.ac. uk/ educol/ documents/OOOOOO 153.html
17. Literacy Taskforce (1999) Report of the Literacy Taskforce. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education
18. Mroz, M., Smith, F. and Hardman, F. (2000) The Discourse of the Literacy Hour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(3): 379-90
19. National Centre for Literacy and Numeracy (1997) The National Literacy Project. London
20. News and Opinion Editorial (1997) No More Quick Fixes. Times Educational Supplement, 28 February
21. OFSTED (Office for Standards in Education) (2001) The National Literacy Strategy: The Third Year (HMI 332). London: OFSTED
22. Rafferty, F. (1996a) Labour Gets Back to Basics. Times Educational Supplement, 31 May
23. Rafferty, F. (1996b) The Road to Sanctuary Buildings. Times Educational Supplement, 12 July
24. Rassool, N. (1999) Literacy: In Search of a Paradigm. In N. Rassool (ed.), Literacy for Sustainable Development in the Age of Information (pp. 25-53). Cleve don, UK; Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters
25. Smith, F. (1971) Understanding Reading: A Psycho1inguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
26. Soler, J. (1999) Past and Present Technocratic Solutions to Teaching Literacy: Implications for New Zealand Primary Teachers and Literacy Programmes. Curriculum Studies 7(3): 521-38
27. Stanovich, K. (1991) Discrepancy Definitions of Reading Disability: Has Intelligence Led us Astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1): 7-29
28. Stanovich, K. (2000) Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers. London: The Guilford Press
29. Stierer, B. (1994) Simply Doing Their Job? The Politics of Reading Standards and 'Real Books'. In B. Stierer and J. Maybin (eds), Language, Literacy, and Learning in Educational Practice: A Reader. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
30. Turner, M. (1990) Sponsored Reading Failure: An Object Lesson. Warlington, Surrey: IPSET Education Unit
31. Wearmouth, J. and Soler, J. (2001) How Inclusive is the Literacy Hour? BritishJournal of Special Education, 28(3): 113-19
32. Wells, C. G. (1987) The Meaning Makers. London: Hodder & Stoughton
33. Vacca, R. T. (1996) Who Will Be the Winners? Who Will Be the Losers? Reading Today, 14(2): 3
34. Young, S. (1997) Reading Standards Static for 50 Years. Times Educational Supplement, 11 July