Young people, new technologies and learning at home: Taking context seriously

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-62

  Furlong, John ^a   Davies, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

informal learning; learning at home; new technologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858270711     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: 14653915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577944     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, codes and control: theoretical studies towards a sociology of language, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Biesta, G. 2006. What's the point lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? On the democratic deficit of policies for lifelong learning. European Educational Research Journal, 5(3-4): 169-180.
3. Biesta, G. and Tedder, M. 2007. Agency and learning in the lifecourse: towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults-Special Issue, 39(2): 132-149.
4. Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Burn, A., Carr, D., Cranmer, S. and Willett, R. 2005. The media literacy of children and young people Available online at:http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/ml_children.pdf
5. Colley, H., Hodkinson, P. and Malcolm, J. 2002. Non-formal learning: mapping the conceptual terrain, a consultation report, Leeds: University of Leeds Lifelong Learning Institute.
6. Erstad, O., Gilje, Ø., Sefton-Green, J. and Sefton-Green, K. 2009. Exploring 'learning lives': community, identity, literacy and meaning. Literacy, 43(2): 100-116.
7. Eynon, R. 2008. The learner and their context: review of the evidence. A report to BECTA, Oxford: Department of Education, University of Oxford.
8. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R. and Sutherland, R. 2003. Screenplay: children and computing in the home, London: Routledge.
9. Fielding, M. 2001. Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2): 123-141.
10. Fielding, M. 2004. Transformative approaches to student voice: theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2): 295-311.
11. Flutter, J. and Rudduck, J. 2004. Consulting pupils: what's in it for schools?, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
12. Francis, R. 2007. The predicament of the learner in the new media age: an investigation into the implications of media change for learning and literacy, Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
13. Gee, J. 2004. Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling, London: Routledge.
14. Green, L. 2001. How popular musicians learn: a way ahead for music education, London & New York: Ashgate Press.
15. Green, L. 2008. Music, informal learning and the school: a new classroom pedagogy, London & New York: Ashgate Press.
16. Ito, M., Horst, H., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., Pascoe, C. J. and Robinson, L. 2008. Living and learning with new media: summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project Available online at:http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf
17. Jenkins, H. 2006. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century (White Paper) Available online at:http://newmedialiteracies.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf
18. Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. 2006. New literacies: everyday practices and classroom learning, (2nd edn.), Maidenhead & New York: Open University Press.
19. Lenhardt, A. and Madden, M. 2 November 2005. Teen content creators and consumers, 2 November, Washington DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available online at:http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp
20. Menchik, D. A. 2004. Placing cybereducation in the UK classroom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(2): 121-193.
21. Mitra, D. 2004. The significance of students: can increasing 'student voice' in schools lead to gains in youth development?. Teachers College Record, 106(4): 651-688.
22. Pollard, A. and Filer, A. 1999. The social world of pupil career: strategic biographies through primary school, London: Continuum International.
23. Rudduck, J. 2006. The potential of listening to pupils. Educational Review, 58(2): 131-231.
24. Rudduck, J. and Flutter, J. 2004. How to improve your school: giving pupils a voice, London: Continuum.
25. Sefton-Green, J. 2004. Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school REPORT 7, Bristol: Futurelab.
26. Sefton-Green, J. 2008. "Informal learning; a solution in search of a problem". In Informal learning and digital media, Edited by: Drotner, K., Jensen, H. S. and Schroder, K. C. 238-255. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
27. Singh, P. 1995. Discourses of computing competence, evaluation and gender: the case of computer use in the primary classroom. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics in education, 16: 81-110.
28. Street, B. 2003. What's 'new' in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2): 77-91.
29. Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as action, New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Whitty, G. and Wisby, E. 2007. Whose voice? An exploration of current policy involvement in school decision-making. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 17(3): 301-319.