On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 226, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 82-94

  Lund, Morten Enemark ^a   De Zee, Mark ^a   Andersen, Michael Skipper ^a   Rasmussen, John ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Musculoskeletal modelling; Validation

Indexed keywords

CURRENT TRANSITIONS; MODEL VALIDATION; MULTI-BODY; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELLING; RESEARCH TOPICS; SIMULATION TOOL; STRUCTURED APPROACH; VALIDATION; VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION; STATE OF THE ART; VERIFICATION-AND-VALIDATION;

HEALTH CARE; PRODUCT DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; JOINT; LEG; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SKELETAL MUSCLE; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; JOINTS; LEG; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84858269605     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: 20413033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954411911431516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. Rasmussen J, Torholm S and De Zee M. Computational analysis of the influence of seat pan inclination and friction on muscle activity and spinal joint forces. Int J Ind Ergonom 2009; 39: 52-57.
2. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Xie X, et al. Musculoskeletal computational analysis of the influence of car-seat design/adjustments on long-distance driving fatigue. Int J Ind Ergonom 2010; 40: 345-355.
3. Wagner D, Rasmussen J and Reed M. Assessing the importance of motion dynamics for ergonomic analysis of manual materials handling tasks using the AnyBody modeling system. J Passenger Cars: Mech Syst 2008; 116: 12-14.
4. Williams JL and Gomaa ST. Kinematics of rotating platform total knee replacements - does the position of the rotating platform axis matter? In The third frontiers in biomedical devices conference and exhibition, Irvine, CA, 18-20 June 2008 pp. 15-16.
5. Grujicic M, Arakere G, Xie X, et al. Design-optimization and material selection for a femoral-fracture fixationplate implant. Mater Des 2010; 31: 3463-3473.
6. Erdemir A, McLean S, Herzog W and Van den Bogert AJ. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clin Biomech 2007; 22: 131-154. (Pubitemid 46038888)
7. Damsgaard M, Rasmussen J, Christensen ST, et al. Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody modeling system. Simul Modell Pract Theory 2006; 14: 1100-1111. (Pubitemid 44792560)
8. LifeModeler Inc. Lifemodeler. http://www.lifemodeler.-com/ (accessed 22 April 2010).
9. Delp SL and Loan JP. A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. Comput Biol Med 1995; 25: 21-34.
10. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, et al. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Engng 2007; 54: 1940-1950. (Pubitemid 350006059)
11. Neal ML and Kerckhoffs R. Current progress in patient-specific modeling. Brief Bioinform 2010; 11: 111-126.
12. National Academy of Engineering. Grand challenges for engineering, www.nae.edu (accessed 19 March 2010).
13. Stansfield BW, Nicol AC, Paul JP, et al. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J Biomech 2003; 36: 929-936. (Pubitemid 36566631)
14. Kim HJ, Fernandez JW, Akbarshahi M, et al. Evaluation of predicted knee-joint muscle forces during gait using an instrumented knee implant. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 1326-1331.
15. Piazza SJ and Delp SL. Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of total knee replacement motion during a step-up task. J Biomech Engng 2001; 123: 599-606. (Pubitemid 34016552)
16. Magermans DJ, Chadwick EKJ, Veeger HEJ, et al. Effectiveness of tendon transfers for massive rotator cuff tears: a simulation study. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 116-122. (Pubitemid 38210207)
17. Saul KR, Murray WM, Hentz VR and Delp SL. Biomechanics of the Steindler flexorplasty surgery: a computer simulation study. J Hand Surg 2003; 28: 979-986. (Pubitemid 37474751)
18. Holzbaur KRS, Murray WM and Delp SL. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann Biomed Engng 2005; 33: 829-840. (Pubitemid 40878489)
19. Johnson FT, Tinoco EN and Yu NJ. Thirty years of development and application of CFD at Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle. Comput Fluids 2005; 34: 1115-1151. (Pubitemid 41194890)
20. Roache PJ. Verification and validation and computational science and engineering. Albuquerque, NM: Hermosa Publishers, 1998.
21. Oberkampf WL and Trucano TG. Verification and validation benchmarks. Nucl Engng Des 2008; 238: 716-743. (Pubitemid 351253682)
22. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. Report V & V 10-2006, 2006. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
23. Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG and Hirsch C. Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Report SAND2003-3769, 2003. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
24. Refsgaard JC and Henriksen HJ. Modelling guidelines - terminology and guiding principles. Adv Water Resour 2004; 27: 71-82. (Pubitemid 37546349)
25. Babuska I and Oden JT. Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engng 2004; 193: 4057-4066. (Pubitemid 39142612)
26. Oberkampf WL and Trucano TG. Design of and comparison with verification and validation benchmarks. In: Benchmarking of CFD codes for application to nuclear reactor safety, Garching Germany: Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2006.
27. Oberkampf WL and Barone MF. Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. J Comput Phys 2006; 217: 5-36. (Pubitemid 44111681)
28. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. Report, 1998, AIAA G-088-1998, 1998. AIAA.
29. American Scociety of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Standard for Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer. , 2009, V & V 20-2009 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA).
30. Schwer LE. An overview of the PTC 60/V&V 10: guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. Engng Comput 2007; 23: 245-252. (Pubitemid 47611100)
31. Rykiel EJ, Jr. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecol Model 1996; 90: 229-244. (Pubitemid 26351149)
32. Hills RG, Pilch M, Dowding KJ, et al. Validation challenge workshop. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engng 2008; 197: 2375-2380.
33. Nigg BM and Herzog W. Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1999.
34. Popper KR and Weiss G. The logic of scientific discovery. Phys Today 1959; 12: 53-54.
35. Griffin MJ. The validation of biodynamic models. Clin Biomech 2001; 16: S81-S92. (Pubitemid 33732996)
36. Anderson AE, Ellis BJ and Weiss JA. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engng 2007; 10: 171-184.
37. Henninger HB, Reese SP, Anderson AE and Weiss JA. Validation of computational models in biomechanics. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engng Med 2010; 224: 801-812.
38. Jiang X, Mahadevan S and Urbina A. Bayesian nonlinear structural equation modeling for hierarchical validation of dynamical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 2010; 24: 957-975.
39. Rebba R and Mahadevan S. Computational methods for model reliability assessment. Reliab Engng Syst Saf 2008; 93: 1197-1207. (Pubitemid 351418141)
40. Chen W, Xiong Y, Tsui K and Wang S. Some metrics and a Bayesian procedure for validating predictive models in engineering design. In ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (DETC2006), Philadelphia, PA, 10 September 2006.
41. Cohen J. The earth is round (p < .05). Am Psychol 1994; 49: 997-1003. (Pubitemid 24976676)
42. Xiao M and Higginson J. Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26: 142-149.
43. Scovil CY and Ronsky, JL. Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. J Biomech 2006; 39: 2055-2063. (Pubitemid 44038723)
44. Redl C, Gfoehler M and Pandy MG. Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26: 306-319. (Pubitemid 46444720)
45. De Groote F, Van Campen A, Jonkers I and De Schutter J. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to Hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. J Biomech 2010; 43: 1876-1883.
46. Nussbaum MA, Chaffin DB and Rechtien CJ. Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimizationbased spine muscle modeling. J Biomech 1995; 28: 401-409.
47. Raikova RT and Prilutsky BI. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. J Biomech 2001; 34: 1243-1255. (Pubitemid 32750635)
48. Bergmann G, Graichen F and Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993; 26: 969-990. (Pubitemid 23220211)
49. D'Lima DD, Townsend CP, Arms SW, et al. An implantable telemetry device to measure intra-articular tibial forces. J Biomech 2005; 38: 299-304. (Pubitemid 39642951)
50. Heinlein B, Graichen F, Bender A, et al. Design, calibration and pre-clinical testing of an instrumented tibial tray. J Biomech 2007; 40: S4-S10. (Pubitemid 46876675)
51. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Bender A, et al. In vivo glenohumeral contact forces-measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively. J Biomech 2007; 40: 2139-2149. (Pubitemid 46978402)
52. Hug F. Can muscle coordination be precisely studied by surface electromyography? J Electromyogr Kinesiology 2011; 21: 1-12.
53. De Zee M, Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, et al. Validation of a musculo-skeletal model of the mandible and its application to mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Biomech 2007; 40: 1192-1201. (Pubitemid 46483466)
54. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. Report PTC 60/V&V 10, 2007. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
55. Fregly BJ, D'Lima DD and Besier T. Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads. https://simtk.org/home/kneeloads/ (accessed 26 March 2011).
56. Babuška I, Nobile F and Tempone R. Reliability of computational science. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 2007; 23: 753-784. (Pubitemid 47128287)
57. Simulia. Abaqus verification manual, http://www.simulia.com/support/ documentation.html (accessed 4 April 2011).
58. ANSYS. ANSYS verification manual, http://www.ansys-com/About+ANSYS/ Quality+Assurance/Quality+Services (accessed 4 April 2011).
59. Bergmann, G. OrthoLoad, http://www.OrthoLoad.com (accessed 14 April 2011).
60. Konikow LF and Bredehoeft JD. Ground-water models cannot be validated. Adv Water Resour 1992; 15: 75-83. (Pubitemid 23375367)
61. Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K and Belitz K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 1994; 263: 641.
62. Olesen C, De Zee M and Rasmussen J. Experimental validation of a computational seated human model for pressure ulcer research. J Appl Biomech 2011 (in review).
63. Anderson FC and Pandy MG. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J Biomech 2001; 34: 153-161. (Pubitemid 32101528)
64. Klein Horsman MD. The Twente lower extremity model: consistent dynamic simulation of the human locomotor apparatus. Report, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2007.
65. Prilutsky BI and Gregor RJ. Analysis of muscle coordination strategies in cycling. IEEE Trans Rehab Engng 2000; 8: 362-370.
66. Prilutsky BI and Zatsiorsky VM. Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; 30: 32-38. (Pubitemid 34272901)
67. Praagman M, Veeger HEJ, Chadwick EKJ, et al. Muscle oxygen consumption, determined by NIRS, in relation to external force and EMG. J Biomech 2003; 36: 905-912. (Pubitemid 36566628)
68. Mesin L, Merletti R and Rainoldi A. Surface EMG: the issue of electrode location. J. Electromyogr Kinesiology 2009; 19: 719-726.
69. Schwer LE. Validation metrics for response histories: perspectives and case studies. Engng Comput 2007; 23: 295-309. (Pubitemid 47611104)
70. Lund ME, De Zee M and Rasmussen J. Comparing calculated and measured curves in validation of musculuskeletal models. In: The XIII international symposium on computer simulation in biomechanics, Leuven Belgium, 30 August 2011.
71. Sandholm A, Schwartz C, Pronost N, et al. Evaluation of a geometry-based knee joint compared to a planar knee joint. Visual Comput 2011; 27: 161-171.
72. NAFEMS. NAFEMS, http://www.nafems.org (accessed 6 April 6 2011).