Design-optimization and material selection for a femoral-fracture fixation-plate implant

Materials and Design

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 3463-3473

  Grujicic, M ^a   Arakere, G ^a   Xie, X ^a   LaBerge, M ^a   Grujicic, A ^a   Wagner, D W ^b   Vallejo, A ^b  

^a AMRL   (United States)

^b Ozen Engineering Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Femoral fracture fixed plate implant; Musculoskeletal modeling and simulations; Optimization

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS ANALYSIS; EVALUATION TEST; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; MATERIAL SELECTION; MULTI-BODY; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELING; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELING AND SIMULATIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES; PERFORMANCE CRITERION; PHYSIOLOGICAL LOADINGS; PRE-CLINICAL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRACTURE FIXATION; OPTIMIZATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

FRACTURE;

EID: 77952746088     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rozbruch S.R., Müller U., Gautier E., Ganz R. The evolution of femoral shaft plating technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 354:195-208.
2. Pappas C.A., Young P.G., Lee A.J. Controlled plastic deformation for the fastening mechanism of an internal fixation device-the new mennen 3 peripro plate. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2007, 10(2):111-120.
3. Zickel R.E. Fractures of the adult femur excluding the femoral head and neck: a review and evaluation of current therapy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 147:93-114.
4. Otto R.J., Moed B.R., Bledsoe J.G. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009, 23(9):645-652.
5. Cegoñino J., García Aznar J.M., Doblaré M., Palanca D., Seral B., Seral F.A. Comparative analysis of different treatments for distal femur fractures using the finite element method. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2004, 7(5):245-256.
6. AnyBody 3.0, Aalborg, Denmark, AnyBody Technology A/S; 2008.
7. Damsgaard M., Rasmussen J., Christensen S.T., Surma E., de Zee M. Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the anybody modeling system. Simul Model Pract Theory 2006, 14:1100-1111.
8. Rasmussen J, de Zee M. Design optimization of airline seats. In: SAE conference, SAE No. 2008-01-1863; 2008.
9. Dendorfer S, Torholm S. Final report on feasibility study. Report No.: 21385/08/NL/PA, presented to ESTEC/ESA by AnyBody Technology A/S; May 2008.
10. AnyScript model repository 7.1. AnyBody 3.0, Aalborg, Denmark, AnyBody Technology A/S; 2009.
11. Van der Helm F.C.T. A finite element musculoskeletal model of the human shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 1994, 27:551-569.
12. de Zee M., Hansen L., Wong C., Rasmussen J., Simonsen E.B. A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model. J Biomech 2007, 40:1219-1227.
13. Wilke H., Neef P., Hinz B., Seidel H., Claes L. Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data - a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech 2001, 16(Suppl. 1):S111-S126.
14. de Jong P., de Zee M, Hilbers PAJ, Savelberg HHCM, van de Vosse FN, Wagemakers A, et al. Multi-body modeling of recumbent cycling: an optimization of configuration and cadence. Master's Thesis. Medical engineering, TU/e biomodelling and bioinformatics, University of Maastricht, Movement Sciences, Aalborg University; 2006.
15. An K.N., Kwak B.M., Chao E.Y., Morrey B.F. Determination of muscle and joint forces: a new technique to solve the indeterminate problem. J Biomech Eng 1984, 106:364-367.
16. Rasmussen J., Torholm S., de Zee M. Computational analysis of the influence of seat pan inclination and friction on muscle activity and spinal joint forces. Int J Indus Ergon 2009, 39:52-57.
17. Bell J.A., Stigant M. Development of a fibre optic goniometer system to measure lumbar and hip movement to detect activities and their lumbar postures. J Med Eng Technol 2007, 31:361-366.
18. Yosibash Z., Padan R., Joscowicz L., Milgrom C. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. ASME J Biomech Eng 2007, 129(3):297-309.
19. Mimics. Medical imaging software, Materialise, user documentation; 2009.
20. ABAQUS Version 6.8-1. User documentation. Dassault Systems; 2009.
21. Papalambros P.Y., Wilde D.J. Principles of optimal design: modeling and computation 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK). 2nd ed.
22. Bendsoe M.P., Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1988, 71(2):197-224.
23. Haftka R.T., Grandhi R.V. Structural shape optimization: a survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1986, 57(1):91-106.
24. HyperStudy. User Manual. Troy (MI), Altair Engineering Inc.; 2009.
25. Schramm U. Multi-disciplinary optimization for NVH and crashworthiness. Troy (MI), Altair Engineering Inc.; 2007.
26. Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress, In: Proceedings of Kyushi Branch; 1987.
27. Brondsted P., Lilholt H., Lystrup A. Composite materials for wind power turbine blades. Annual Rev Mater Res 2005, 35:505-538.
28. ANSYS Version 12. User documentation. Ansys Inc.; 2009.
29. Grujicic M, Arakere G, Bell WC, Marvi H, Yalavarthy HV, Pandurangan B, Haque I, Fadel GM. Reliability-based design optimization for durability of ground-vehicle suspension-system components. J Mater Eng Perform, 2009.