Supporting reflective public thought with considerit

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 265-274

  Kriplean, Travis ^a   Morgan, Jonathan ^a   Freelon, Deen ^a   Borning, Alan ^a   Bennett, Lance ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

consideration; deliberation; governance; politics; reflection

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; CONSIDERATION; DELIBERATION; DRILL-DOWN; EMPIRICAL DATA; GOVERNANCE; KEYPOINTS; POLITICS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; REFLECTION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 84858218540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2145204.2145249     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. B. Adler et al. Assigning trust to wikipedia content. In WikiSym, 2008.
2. C. Anderson. Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences. Int. J. of Communication, 5, 2011.
3. B. Bailey et al. A case study of a grassroots innovation pipeline within a large software company. In CHI, 2010.
4. E. Baumer et al. Fostering critical and creative thinking about metaphor in political blogs. In CHI, 2010.
5. Bell, W. and Labaree, L (eds). Mr. Franklin: A Selection from His Personal Letters. Yale University Press, 1954.
6. I. Beschastnikh et al. Wikipedian Self-Governance in Action. In ICWSM, 2008.
7. J. Conklin et al. 15 years on from gibis. In HYPERTEXT, 2001.
8. L. Dahlberg. Democracy via cyberspace. New Media & Society, 3(2), 2001.
9. N. Diakopoulos et al. Videolyzer: quality analysis of online informational video for bloggers and journalists. In CHI, 2009.
10. J. Dryzek. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford Press, 2002.
11. T. Erickson and W. A. Kellogg. Social translucence. TOCHI, 7(1), 2000.
12. S. Faridani et al. Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments. CHI, 2010.
13. J. Fishkin. Strategies of Public Consultation. Integrated Assessment, 6(2), 2006.
14. A. Forte et al. Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. In HICSS, 2008.
15. N. Fraser. A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 1990.
16. D. Freelon. Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society, 12(7), 2010.
17. M. Gamon et al. Using Blogs to Provide Context for News Articles. In ICWSM, 2008.
18. R. Garrett. Echo chambers online. J. of CMC, 14(2), 2009.
19. J. Gastil. Political Communication and Deliberation. Sage, 2008.
20. J. Habermas. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press, 1991.
21. S. Hansen et al. Wikipedia and the possibility of rational discourse. The Information Society, 25(1), 2009.
22. B. Huberman. The Laws of the Web. MIT Press, 2001.
23. S. Isenmann et al. IBIS: a convincing concept . . . but a lousy instrument? In DIS, 1997.
24. S. Iyengar et al. Deliberative public opinion in presidential primaries. In Voice and Citizenship Conference, 2004.
25. N. Jankowski et al. The Prospects for Political Renewal Through the Internet, chapter Internet-based political discourse. 2002.
26. A. Kittur et al. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In CHI, 2008.
27. S. Knobloch-Westerwick et al. Looking the other way. Comm. Research, 36(3), 2009.
28. T. Kobayashi et al. Selective exposure in political web browsing. Information, Communication & Society, 12(6), 2009.
29. K. Kraemer et al. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Comput. Surv., 20, 1988.
30. T. Kriplean et al. Supporting Active Listening and Grounding on the Web through Restatement. In CSCW Horizons, 2011.
31. P. Lange. Commenting on comments. In Society for Applied Anthropology, 2007.
32. K. Luther et al. An online collaboration environment for citizen scientists. In CHI, 2009.
33. M. MacKuen et al. Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. Am. J. of Pol. Sci., 54(2), 2010.
34. P. Muhlberger. The virtual agora project. J. of Public Deliberation, 1(1), 2005.
35. S. Munson et al. Presenting diverse political opinions. In CHI, 2010.
36. D. Mutz. Hearing the Other Side. Cambridge, 2006.
37. S. Park et al. Newscube: Delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In CHI, 2009.
38. W. Parker. Teaching Democracy. Columbia, 2003.
39. V. Price et al. Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Comm. Theory, 1(16), 2006.
40. D. Schuler. Online Deliberation: Design, Research, & Practice, chapter Online civic deliberation with E-liberate. 2009.
41. B. Shanks et al. Online Deliberation: Design, Research, & Practice, chapter A module for parliamentary procedure. 2009.
42. F. Shipman et al. Formality considered harmful. JCSCW, 8(4), 1999.
43. S. Shum. Visualizing Argumentation. Springer, 2003.
44. S. Shum. Cohere: Towards web 2.0 argumentation. In COMMA, 2008.
45. A. Sukumaran et al. Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. In CHI, 2011.
46. C. Sunstein. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton Univ. Press, 2009.
47. M. Trice. The Ethics of Emerging Media, chapter How We Comment on Web Journalism. 2011.
48. K. Wahl-Jorgensen. Letters to the editor as a forum for public deliberation. Crit. Stud. in Media Comm., 18(3), 2001.
49. S. Wright. Government-run Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control. Brit. J. of Politics and Int. Relations, 8, 2006.