The Virtual Agora Project: A research design for studying democratic deliberation

Journal of Public Deliberation

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Muhlberger, Peter ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645858758     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baym Nancy K. 1995. The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication. In CyberSociety: computer-mediated communication and community, edited by S. Jones. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
2. Conover, Pamela Johnston, Donald D. Searing, and Ivor M. Crewe. 2002. The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion. British Journal of Political Science 32 (1):42.
3. Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Gastil, John, and James P Dillard. 1999. Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation. Political Communication 16 (1):3-25.
5. Gilens, Martin. 2001. Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (2):379-396.
6. Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work, Cambridge studies in political psychology and public opinion. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire. 1984. Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. American Psychologist 39 (10):1123-1134.
8. Kiesler, Sara and Lee Sproull. 1992. Group Decision Making and Communication Technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 (1):96-123.
9. Lea, Martin, and Russell Spears. 1991. Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (2):283-301.
10. Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, Roger Jowell, and Rebecca Gray. 1996. Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in the U.K. Paper read at International Society of Political Psychology, at Vancouver, B.C.
11. Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Dennis L. Plane. 1999. Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, at Washington, DC.
12. McLean, Iain S., Christian List, James S. Fishkin, and Robert C. Luskin. 2000. Does Deliberation Produce Preference Structuration? Evidence From Deliberative Opinion Polls (http://www.la.utexas.edu/research/delpol/papers/structuration.pdf). Paper read at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, at Washington, D.C.
13. Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. The Deliberative Citizen: Theory And Evidence. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6:151-193.
14. Muhlberger, Peter. 2003. Beyond Political Interest: Political Internalization in Political Participation. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, at Philadelphia, PA (also available from http://communityconnections.heinz.cmu.edu/papers).
15. Muhlberger, Peter. 2005. Human Agency and the Revitalization of the Public Sphere. Political Communication 22 (2):163-178.
16. Muhlberger, Peter. 2005. Stealth Democracy, Apathy Rationales, and Deliberation. Paper read at International Communication Association Annual Meeting, at New York, NY (also available from http://communityconnections.heinz.cmu.edu/papers).
17. Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, and Martin Lea. 1998. Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 25 (6):689-715.
18. Price, Vincent, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2002. Online Deliberation and its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000. IT&Society 1 (1):303-329.
19. Rosenberg, Shawn W. 2002. The Not So Common Sense: Differences in How People Judge Social and Political Life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Walker, Jack. 1965. A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. American Political Science Review:285-295.