Estimation of accuracy of patient-specific musculoskeletal modelling: Case study on a post polio residual paralysis subject

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 745-751

  Dao, T T ^a   Marin, F ^a   Pouletaut, P ^a   Charleux, F ^b   Aufaure, P ^b   Ho Ba Tho, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b Polyclinique St Côme ^*  (France)

Author keywords

biomechanics; gait; lower limbs; musculoskeletal modelling; patient specific

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRIC STANDARDS; CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS; EXPERIMENTAL ERRORS; EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOLS; GAIT; GEOMETRICAL MODELS; INERTIAL PARAMETERS; INERTIAL PROPERTIES; INFRA-RED CAMERAS; LOWER LIMB; MEAN ERRORS; MOTION CAPTURE; MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELLING; PATIENT SPECIFIC; RELATIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SCAN DATA; SEGMENTATION PROCEDURE;

BIOMECHANICS; DIAGNOSIS; ERRORS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; KINEMATICS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAIT; HUMAN; LEG; MALE; PARALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTPOLIOMYELITIS SYNDROME; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAIT; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PARALYSIS; POSTPOLIOMYELITIS SYNDROME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84858214163     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.558086     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnold, AS and Delp, SL. 2005. Computer modeling of gait abnormalities in cerebral palsy: application to treatment planning. Theor Issues Ergon Sci, 6: 305-312.
2. Arnold, AS, Thelen, DG, Schwartzd, MH, Andersona, FC and Delp, SL. 2007. Muscular coordination of knee motion during the terminal-swing phase of normal gait. J Biomech, 40: 3314-3324.
3. Bennett, MB and Ker, RF. 1990. The mechanical properties of the human subcalcaneal fat pad in compression. J Anat., 171: 131-138.
4. Blemker, SS and Delp, LD. 2006. Rectus femoris and vastus intermedius fiber excursions predicted by three-dimensional muscle models. J Biomech, 39(8): 1383-1391.
5. Calais-Germain, B, O'Connor, J, Kaplan, A and MacKenzie, R. 2007. Anatomy of movement, Seattle, WA: Eastland Press, Inc.
6. Cappozzo, A, Croce, UD, Leardini, A and Chiari, L. 2005. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture, 21: 186-196.
7. Chandler, RF, Clauser, CE, McConville, JT, Reynolds, HM and Young, JW. 1975. Investigation of inertial properties of the human body, 74-137. Dayton, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Tech. Rep. AMRL
8. Chau, T. 2001a. A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 1: fuzzy, statistical and fractal methods. Gait Posture, 13: 49-66.
9. Chau, T. 2001b. A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: neural network and wavelet methods. Gait Posture, 13: 102-120.
10. Cheng, CK, Chen, HH, Chen, CS, Lee, CL and Chen, CY. 2000. Segment inertial properties of Chinese adults determined from magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Biomech, 15: 559-566.
11. Chèze, L. 2000. Comparison of different calculations of three-dimensional joint kinematics from video-based system data. J Biomech, 33: 1695-1699.
12. Chèze, L, Fregly, BJ and Dimnet, J. 1995. A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. J Biomech, 28: 879-884.
13. Dao, TT, Marin, F and Ho Ba Tho, MC. 2009. Influence of anthropometrical and geometrical parameters of the bones and muscles on musculoskeletal model of the lower limbs. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 12(Sup. 1): 91-92.
14. Davis, RB, Ounpuu, S, Tyburski, D and Gage, JR. 1991. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci, 10: 575-587.
15. Dehmeshki, J, Ye, X, Amin, H, Abaei, M, Lin, X and Qanadli, SD. 2007. Volumetric quantification of atherosclerotic plaque in CT considering partial volume effect. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 26(3): 273-282.
16. Delp SL. 1990. Surgery simulation: a computer graphics system to analyze and design musculoskeletal reconstruction of the lower limb. [PhD thesis]. Stanford University.
17. Dietz, V. 1997. Neurophysiology of gait disorders: present and future applications, electroencephalography and clinical. Neurophysiology, 103: 333-355.
18. Foster JK, Kortge JO, Wolanin MJ. 1977. HYBRID III-a biomechanically based crash test dummy. Proceedings of the 21st Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE Paper no. 770938, Warrendale, PA, Society of Automotive Engineers, 975-1014.
19. Fregly, BJ, Reinbolt, JA, Rooney, KL, Mitchell, KH and Chmielewski, TL. 2007. Design of patient-specific gait modifications for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 54: 1687-1695.
20. Fregly, BJ, Reinbolt, JA and Chmielewski, TL. 2008. Evaluation of a patient-specific cost function to predict the influence of foot path on the knee adduction torque during gait. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 11: 63-71.
21. Hatze, H. 1976. The complete optimization of a human motion. Math Biosci, 28: 99-135.
22. Hatze, H. 1981. Estimation of myodynamics parameter values from observations on isometrically contracting muscle groups. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 46: 325-338.
23. Hicks, JL, Schwartz, MH, Arnold, AS and Delp, SL. 2008. Crouched postures reduce the capacity of muscles to extend the hip and knee during the single-limb stance phase of gait. J Biomech, 41: 960-967.
24. Jonkers, I, Stewart, C and Spaepen, A. 2003. The study of muscle action during single support and swing phase of gait: clinical relevance of forward simulation techniques. Gait Posture, 17: 97-105.
25. Jonkers, I, Stewart, C, Desloovere, K, Molenaers, G and Spaepen, A. 2006. Musculo-tendon length and lengthening velocity of rectus femoris in stiff knee gait. Gait Posture, 23: 222-229.
26. Kaufman, KR, An, KN, Litchy, WJ and Chao, EYS. 1991. Physiological prediction of muscle forces-I. Theoretical formulation. Neuroscience, 40: 781-792.
27. Kuo, AD. 1998. A least squares estimation approach to improving the precision of inverse dynamics computations. J Biomech Eng, 120: 148-159.
28. Marin, F, Allain, J, Diop, A, Maurel, N, Simondi, M and Lavaste, F. 1999. On the estimation of knee joint kinematics. Hum Mov Sci, 18(5): 613-626.
29. Marin, F, Sangeux, M, Charleux, F, Ho Ba Tho, MC and Dürselen, L. 2006. Can a finite set of knee extension in supine position be used for a knee functional examination?. J Biomech, 39(2): 359-363.
30. Marin, F, Hoang, TN and Ho Ba Tho, MC. 2010. In vivo intersegmental motion of the cervical spine using an inverse kinematics procedure. Clin Biomech, 25(5): 389-396.
31. Nazer, RA, Rantalainen, T, Heinonen, A, Sievanen, H and Mikkola, A. 2008. Flexible multibody simulation approach in the analysis of tibial strain during walking. J Biomech, 41: 1036-1043.
32. Otake, Y, Suzuki, N, Hattori, A, Miki, H, Yamamura, M, Nakamura, N, Sugano, N, Yonenobu, K and Ochi, T. 2004. Four-dimensional patient-specific musculoskeletal model of the patient after total hip arthroplasty. Int Cong Ser, 1268: 591-596.
33. Pearsall, DJ and Costigan, PA. 1999. The effect of segment parameter error on gait analysis results. Gait Posture, 9(3): 173-183.
34. Rao, G, Amarantinia, D, Bertona, E and Favier, D. 2004. Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait. J Biomech, 39(8): 1531-1536.
35. Ren, L, Jones, RK and Howard, D. 2008. Whole body inverse dynamics over a complete gait cycle based only on measured kinematics. J Biomech, 41: 2750-2759.
36. Scheys, L, Campenhout, AV, Spaepen, A, Suetens, P and Jonkers, I. 2008. Personalized MRI-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait Posture, 28: 358-365.
37. Silva, MPT and Ambrósio, JAC. 2004. Sensitivity of the results produced by the inverse dynamic analysis of a human stride to perturbed input data. Gait Posture, 19(1): 35-49.
38. Simon, SR. 2004. Quantification of human motion: gait analysis-benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. J Biomech, 37: 1869-1880.
39. Sparrow, WA and Tirosh, O. 2005. Gait termination: a review of experimental methods and the effects of ageing and gait pathologies. Gait Posture, 22: 362-371.
40. Surgical Planning Laboratory. Brigham and Women's Hospital and the MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1998; [cited 2009 May 1]. Available from: http://www.slicer.org 1998
41. Tran, HV. 2007. Caractérisation des propriétés mécaniques de la peau humaine in vivo via l'IRM, France: University of Technology of Compiègne. [PhD thesis]
42. Van den Bogert, AJ and Su, A. 2008. A weighted least squares method for inverse dynamic analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 11: 3-9.
43. Van der Krogt, MM, Doorenbosch, CAM and Harlaar, J. 2007. Muscle length and lengthening velocity in voluntary crouch gait. Gait Posture, 26: 532-538.
44. Whittle, MW. 1996. Clinical gait analysis: a review. Hum Mov Sci, 15(3): 369-387.
45. Wilson, DR and O'Connor, JJ. 1997. A three-dimensional geometric model of the knee for the study of joint forces in gait. Gait Posture, 5: 108-115.
46. Zajac, FE. 1989. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 17: 359-411.
47. Zanchi, V, Papic, V and Cecic, M. 2000. Quantitative human gait analysis. Simulat Pract Theory, 8: 127-139.
48. Zatsiorsky, VM, Seluyanov, VN and Chugunova, LG. 1990. "In vivo body segment inertial parameters determination using a gamma-scanner method". In Biomechanics of human movement: applications in rehabilitation, sports and ergonomics, Edited by: Berme, N and Cappozzo, A. 187-202. Worthington, OH: Bertec Corporation.
49. Zhang, J, Yan, CH, Chui, CK and Ong, SH. 2010. Fast segmentation of bone in CT images using 3D adaptive thresholding. Comput Biol Med, 40(2): 231-236.