Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: Effect on hip moment arm lengths

Gait and Posture

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 358-365

  Scheys, Lennart ^a,b   Van Campenhout, Anja ^a   Spaepen, Arthur ^b   Suetens, Paul ^a   Jonkers, Ilse ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cerebral palsy; Femoral anteversion; Gait; MR; Musculoskeletal modelling

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ADDUCTION; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; FEMALE; FEMORAL ANTEVERSION; FEMUR MALFORMATION; FLEXOR REFLEX; GAIT; GEOMETRY; HIP; HIP MOMENT ARM LENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

EID: 54049099140     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sheldon RS. Quantification of human motion: gait analysis - benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. J Biomech 2004;37(12):1869-80.
2. Arnold AS, Delp SL. Computer modeling of gait abnormalities in cerebral palsy: application to treatment planning. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2005;6(3):305-12.
3. Arnold AS, Liu MQ, Schwartz MH, Õunpuu S, Dias LS, Delp SL. Do the hamstrings operate at increased muscle-tendon lengths and velocities after surgical lengthening? J Biomech 2006;39(8):1498-506.
4. Arnold AS, Blemker SS, Delp SL. Evaluation of a deformable musculoskeletal model for estimating muscle-tendon lengths during crouch gait. Ann Biomed Eng 2001;29:1-11.
5. Sutherland DH. The evolution of clinical gait analysis. Part II. Kinematics. Gait Posture 2002;16:159-79.
6. Baker R. Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehab 2006;3:4.
7. Duda GN, Brand D, Freitag S, Lierse W, Schneider E. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech 1996;29(9):1185-90.
8. Scheys L, Jonkers I, Loeckx D, Maes F, Spaepen A, Suetens P. Image based musculoskeletal modeling allows personalized biomechanical analysis of gait. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2006;4072:58-66.
9. Scheys L, Jonkers I, Loeckx D, Van Campenhout A, Spaepen A, Suetens P. Estimation of hip-muscle geometry using automated, nonrigid atlas-based registration of MR-images. In: American Society of Biomechanics Annual Meeting (ASB 2007); 2007.p. 191-2.
10. Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Topp EL, Rosen JM. An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1990;37(8):757-67.
11. Lu TW, O'Connor JJ. Bone position estimation from skin marker coordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomech 1999;32(2):129-34.
12. Zoroofi RA, Nishii T, Sato Y, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H, Tamura S. Segmentation of avascular necrosis of the femoral head using 3-D MR images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2001;25(6):511-21.
13. Besl P, McKay HD. A method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992;14(2):239-56.
14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
15. Swanson AB, Greene PW, Allis HD. Rotational deformities of the lower extremity in children and their clinical significance. Clin Orthop 1963;27:157-75.
16. Delp SL, Maloney W. Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Biomech 1993;26(4-5):485-99.
17. Scheys L, Spaepen A, Suetens P, Jonkers I. Calculated moment-arm and muscle-tendon lengths during gait differ substantially using MR based versus rescaled generic lower-limb musculoskeletal models, Gait Posture (2008), doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.010.
18. Arnold AS, Salinas S, Asakawa DJ, Delp SL. Accuracy of muscle moment arms estimated from MRI-based musculoskeletal models of the lower extremity. Comput Aid Surg 2000;5:108-19.
19. Gage JR. The treatment of gait problems in cerebral palsy. London: Mac Keith Press; 2004.