Effect of a Computer-Delivered Math Fact Intervention as a Supplemental Intervention for Math in Third and Fourth Grades

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 184-191

  Burns, Matthew K ^a   Kanive, Rebecca ^a   DeGrande, Megan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

math intervention; response to intervention; small group intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858173815     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932510381652     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baker S.,Gersten R.,Lee D. S.A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students.Elementary School Journal. 2002;103:51-73.
2. Batsche G.,Elliott J.,Graden J. L.,Grimes J.,Kovaleski J. F.,Prasse D.,...Tilly W. D.Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education; 2005:.
3. Binder C.Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm.Behavior Analyst. 1996;19:163-197.
4. Burns M. K.Using incremental rehearsal to practice multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation.Education and Treatment of Children. 2005;28:237-249.
5. Burns M.,Gibbons K.Implementing response to intervention procedures in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practice. New York, NY: Routledge; 2008:.
6. Burns M. K.,Hall-Lande J.,Lyman W.,Rogers C.,Tan C. S.Tier II interventions within response-to-intervention: Components of an effective approach.Communiqué. 2006;35 (4): 38-40.
7. Burns M. K.,VanDerHeyden A. M.,Boice C. H.Best practices in school psychology V. Thomas A.Grimes J., ed. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists; 2008:1151-1162.
8. Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988:.
9. Daly E. J.,Hintze J. M.,Hamler K. R.Improving practice by taking steps toward technological improvements in academic interventions in the new millennium.Psychology in the Schools. 2000;37:61-72.
10. Dehaene S.,Akhavein R.Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1995;21:314-326.
11. Fuchs L. S.Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2003;18:172-186.
12. Fuchs L. S.,Fuchs D.,Karns K.Enhancing kindergarteners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies.Elementary School Journal. 2001;101:495-510.
13. Garner M. L.The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook. Spies R. A.Plake B. S., ed. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements; 2005:.
14. Geary D. C.,Hoard M. K.,Byrd-Craven J.,Nugent L.,Numtee C.Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability.Child Development. 2007;78:1343-1359.
15. Hanich L.,Jordan N. C.,Kaplan D.,Dick J.Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;93:615-626.
16. Haring N. G.,Eaton M. D.The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Haring N. G.Lovitt T. C.Eaton M. D.Hansen C. L., ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill; 1978:23-40.
17. Hiebert J.,Lefevre P.Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hiebert J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986:1-27.
18. Holmes C. T.,Brown C. L.,Algozzine B.Promoting academic success for all students.Academic Exchange Quarterly. 2006;10:141-147.
19. Houchins D. E.,Shippen M. E.,Flores M. M.Special education for all teachers. 2004). Math assessment and instruction for students at-risk. In ColarussoR.O'RourkeC. (Eds.), Special education for all teachers (3rd ed., pp. 319-357). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Colarusso R.O'Rourke C., ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt; 2004:319-357.
20. Jimenez J. E.,Ortiz M. D. R.,Rodrigo M.,Hernandez-Valle I.,Ramirez G.,Estevez A.,...Trabaue M.Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-achievement discrepancy?.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2003;36:34-47.
21. Kilpatrick J.,Swafford J.,Findell B.Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:.
22. Logan G. D.,Taylor S. E.,Etherton J. L.Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1996;22:620-638.
23. Mazzocco M. M.Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Berch D. B.Mazzocco M. M., ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2007:29-48.
24. McIntire T.The administrator's guide to data-driven decision making.Technology & Learning. 2002;22 (11): 18 32-28 33.
25. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author; 2000:.
26. Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2008:.
27. Poncy B. C.,Skinner C. H.Detect, practice, and repair: The effects of a classwide intervention on elementary students' math-fact fluency.Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools. 2006;7:69-72.
28. Star Math: Version 2.0. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author; 2002:.
29. Math Facts in a Flash. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author; 2003:.
30. Rittle-Johnson B.,Siegler R. S.The development of mathematical skill. Donlan C., ed. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1998:75-110.
31. Rittle-Johnson B.,Siegler R. S.,Wagner M. A.Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;93:346-362.
32. Rivera D. M.,Bryant B. R.Mathematics instruction for students with special needs.Intervention in School and Clinic. 1992;28:71-86.
33. Saffer N.Core subjects and your career.Occupational Outlook Quarterly. 1999;43 (2): 26-40.
34. Samuels S. J.Information processing abilities and reading.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1987;20:18-22.
35. Shinn M.Assessment for intervention. Brown-Chidsey R., ed. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005:219-246.
36. Singer-Dudek J.,Greer R. D.Long-term analysis of the relationship between fluency and the training and maintenance of complex math skills.Psychological Record. 2005;55:361-376.
37. Springer R. M.,Pugalee D.,Algozzine B.Improving mathematics skills in high school students.Clearing House. 2007;81:37-44.
38. Szadokierski I.,Burns M. K.Analogue evaluation of the effects of opportunities to respond and ratios of known items within drill rehearsal of Esperanto words.Journal of School Psychology. 2008;46:593-609.
39. Torgesen J. K.,Alexander A. W.,Wagner R. K.,Rashotte C. A.,Voeller K. K. S.,Conway T.Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes for two instructional approaches.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2001;34:33-58.
40. VanDerHeyden A. M.,Burns M. K.Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores.Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2005;30 (3): 15-29.
41. Vaughn S.,Wanzek J.,Linan-Thompson S.,Murray C.The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Jimerson S. R.Burns M. K.VanDerHeyden A. M., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2007:234-243.
42. Vellutino F. R.,Scanlon D. M.,Sipay E. R.,Small S.,Chen R.,Pratt A.,Denkla M. B.Cognitive profiles of difficulty-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experimental deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1996;88:601-638.
43. Wayman J. C.Involving teachers in data-driven decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection.Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk. 2005;10:295-308.
44. Ysseldyke J.,Bolt D.Effect of technology-enhanced continuous progress monitoring on math achievement.School Psychology Review. 2007;36:453-467.
45. Ysseldyke J. E.,McLeod S.Handbook of response to intervention. Jimerson S.Burns M.VanderHeyden A., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2007:396-407.
46. Ysseldyke J.,Thrill T.,Pohl J.,Bolt D.Using Math Facts in a Flash to enhance computational fluency.Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools. 2005;6:59-89.