Learning from yesterday's mistakes to fix tomorrow's problems: When functional counterfactual thinking and psychological distance collide

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 383-390

  Smallman, Rachel ^a   Mcculloch, Kathleen C ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactual thinking; Intentions; Psychological distance; Self regulation; Temporal distance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858167490     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1858     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168-192.
3. sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175-197.
4. Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
5. Friedman, R. S., Fishbach, A., Förster, J., & Werth, L. (2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 277-286.
6. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and the consideration of alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 357-383.
7. Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 357-365.
8. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psychological Review, 105, 602-605.
9. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
10. Jarvis, B. G. (2004a). MediaLab Research Software, Version 2004 [Computer Program]. New York, NY (www.empirisoft.com): Empirisoft.
11. Jarvis, B. G. (2004b). DirectRT Research Software, Version 2004 [Computer Program]. New York, NY (www.empirisoft.com): Empirisoft.
12. Kahneman, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 375-396). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, E. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Krishnamurthy, P., & Sivaraman, A. (2002). Counterfactual thinking and advertising responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 650-658.
15. Leach, F. R., & Plaks, J. E. (2009). Regret for errors of commission versus omission in the near-term and far-term: The role of level of abstraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 221-229.
16. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability consideration in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
17. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353-383). New York: Guilford.
18. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
19. Markman, K. D., Lindberg, M. J., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem-solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 312-324.
20. McMullen, M. N., & Markman, K. D. (2000). Downward counterfactuals and motivation: The "wake-up call" and the "Pangloss" effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 575-584.
21. Oettingen, G. (2000). Expectancy effects on behavior depend on self-regulatory thought. Social Cognition, 18, 101-129.
22. Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1198-1212.
23. Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736-753.
24. Oettingen, G., & Stephens, E. J. (2009). Fantasies and motivationally intelligent goal setting. In G. B. Moskowitz, & H. Grant (Eds.), The psychology of goals (pp. 153-178). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Page, C. M., & Colby, P. M. (2003). If only I hadn't smoked: The impact of counterfactual thinking on a smoking-related behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 955-976.
26. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
27. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
28. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
29. Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1109-1120.
30. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1993). The structure of counterfactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 312-319.
31. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 29 (pp. 1-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Segura, S., & Morris, M. W. (2005). Scenario simulations in learning: Forms and functions at the organizational level. In D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 94-109). New York: Routledge.
33. Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from the perspective of cognitive psychology (pp. 247-274). New York: Academic Press.
34. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Smallman, R. (2010). The role of relevant information in functional counterfactual thinking. Dissertation submitted to University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
36. Smallman, R., & Roese, N. J. (2009). Counterfactual thinking facilitates behavioral intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 845-852.
37. Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473-482.
38. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
39. Wakslak, C. J., & Trope, Y. (2009). Cognitive consequences of affirming the self: The relationship between self-affirmation and object construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 927-932.
40. Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when the entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135, 641-653.
41. Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161-169.