School choice and the branding of catholic schools

Education Finance and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 202-245

  Trivitt, Julie R ^a   Wolf, Patrick J ^b  

^a ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858111533     PISSN: 15573060     EISSN: 15573079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00032     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baldi, Stéphane, Ying Jin, Melanie Skemer, Patricia Green, and Deborah Herget. 2007. Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, NCES 200-16. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
2. Barrow, Lisa, and Cecilia E. Rouse. 2008. School vouchers: Recent findings and unanswered questions. Economic Perspectives 32(3): 2-16.
3. Belfield, Clive R., and Henry M. Levin. 2002. The effects of competition on educational outcomes: A review of the U.S. evidence. Review of Educational Research 72(2): 279-341.
4. Bennett, Julie. 2008. Brand-name charters: The franchise model applied to schools. Education Next 8(3): 28-34.
5. Brasington, David M. 2000. Demand and supply of public school quality in metropolitan areas: The role of private schools. Journal of Regional Science 40(3): 583-605.
6. Bryk, Anthony S., Valerie E. Lee, and Peter B. Holland. 1993. Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Buetow, Harold A. 1970. Of singular benefit: The story of Catholic education in the United States. New York: Macmillan.
8. Cohen-Zada, Danny. 2006. Preserving religious identity through education: Economic analysis and evidence from the U.S. Journal of Urban Economics 60(3): 372-98.
9. Cohen-Zada, Danny, and Moshe Justman. 2003. The political economy of school choice: Linking theory and evidence. Journal of Urban Economics 54(2): 277-308.
10. Cohen-Zada, Danny, and Moshe Justman. 2005. The religious factor in private education. Journal of Urban Economics 57(3): 391-418.
11. Cohen-Zada, Danny, and William Sander. 2008. Religion, religiosity and private school choice: Implications for estimating the effectiveness of private schools. Journal of Urban Economics 64(1): 85-100.
12. Collins, Alan, and Martin C. Snell. 2000. Parental preferences and choice of school. Applied Economics 32(7): 801-13.
13. Cornman, Stephen Q., Thomas Stewart, and Patrick J. Wolf. 2007. New education consumers: Parent and student voices on the second year of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program. School Choice Demonstration Project. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
14. Cowen, Joshua. 2008. School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the "complier average causal effect" of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal 36(2): 301-14.
15. Eide, Eric R., Dan D. Goldhaber, and Mark H. Showalter. 2004. Does Catholic high school attendance lead to attendance at a more selective college? Social Science Quarterly 85(5):1335-52.
16. Epple, Dennis, and Glenn J. Platt. 1998. Equilibrium and local redistribution in an urban economy when households differ in both preferences and income. Journal of Urban Economics 43(1): 23-51.
17. Epple, Dennis, and Richard Romano. 1998. Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer group effects. American Economic Review 88(1): 33-62.
18. Figlio, David N., and Joe A. Stone. 1999. Are private schools really better? Research in Labor Economics 18: 115-40.
19. Friedman, Milton. 1955. The role of government in education. In Economics and the public interest, edited by Robert A. Solo, pp. 123-44. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20. Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Gambitta, Richard, Richard Jones, and Gabriel Acevedo. 2006. Research report on Catholic schools. Report commissioned by the Archdiocese of San Antonio, February.
22. Gibbons, Jean Dickinson, and Subhabrata Chakraborti. 2003. Nonparametric statistical inference, 4th ed., rev. and expanded. New York: Marcel Dekker.
23. Glenn, Charles L., Jr. 1987. The myth of the common school. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
24. Gonzales, Patrick, Juan Carlos Guzmán, Lisette Partelow, Erin Pahlke, Leslie Jocelyn, David Kastberg, and Trevor Williams. 2004. Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study.U.S. Department of Education, NCES 2005-005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Greene, Jay P. 2001. Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Matters 1(2): 55-60.
26. Greene, Jay P., and Greg Forster. 2002. Rising to the challenge: The effect of school choice on public schools in Milwaukee and San Antonio. Manhattan Institute Civic Bulletin 27.
27. Greene, Jay P., and Ryan H. Marsh. 2009. The effect of Milwaukee's parental choice program on student achievement in Milwaukee public schools. School Choice Demonstration Project Comprehensive Longitudinal Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, Report No. 11. Available www.uark.edu/ua/der/SCDP/Milwaukee Eval/Report 11.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2009.
28. Greene, Jay, Paul Peterson, and Jiangtao Du. 1996. The effectiveness of school choice in Milwaukee: A secondary analysis of data from the program's evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 30 August.
29. Greene, Jay P., and Marcus A. Winters. 2003. When schools compete: The effects of vouchers on Florida public school achievement. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Working Paper No. 2. Available www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp 02.htm. Accessed 18 November 2009.
30. Greene, Jay P., and Marcus A. Winters. 2006. Leaving boys behind: Public high school graduation rates. Manhattan Institute Civic Report No. 48.
31. Hamilton, Scott W. 2008. Who will save America's urban Catholic schools? Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
32. Henig, Jeffrey R. 1994. Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Holmes, George M., Jeff DeSimone, and Nicholas G. Rupp. 2003. Does school choice increase school quality? NBER Working Paper No. 9683.
34. Howell, William G., and Paul E. Peterson. 2006. The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
35. Howell, William G., Patrick J. Wolf, David E. Campbell, and Paul E. Peterson. 2002. School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(2): 191-217.
36. Hoxby, Caroline M. 2000. Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? American Economic Review 90(5): 1209-38.
37. Hoxby, Caroline M. 2003. School choice and school productivity: Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In The economics of school choice, edited by Caroline M. Hoxby, pp. 287-342. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Jeynes, William H. 2002. Educational policy and the effects of attending a religious school on the academic achievement of children. Educational Policy 13(3): 406-24.
39. King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review 95(1): 49-69.
40. Kotler, Philip. 2003. Marketing management, 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Lankford, Hamilton, and James Wyckoff. 1992. Primary and secondary school choice among public and religious alternatives. Economics of Education Review 11(4): 317-37.
42. Metcalf, Kim K., Stephen D. West, Natalie A. Legan, Kelli M. Paul, and William J. Boone. 2003. Evaluation of the Cleveland scholarship and tutoring program: Technical report 1998-2001. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Center for Evaluation.
43. Meyer, Peter. 2007. Can Catholic schools be saved? Education Next 7(2): 12-19.
44. National Catholic Educational Association (NCEA). 2004. Faith-filled future: 2004 annual report of the National Catholic Educational Association. Washington, DC: NCEA.
45. National Catholic Educational Association (NCEA). 2009. A brief overview of Catholic schools in America. Available www.ncea.org/about/HistoricalOverviewof CatholicSchoolsInAmerica.asp. Accessed 18 November 2009.
46. Neal, Derek. 1997. The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics 15(1): 98-123.
47. Notre Dame Task Force on Catholic Education. 2006. Making God known, loved and served: The future of Catholic primary and secondary schools in the United States. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2007. Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2007. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
49. Rouse, Cecilia Elena. 1998. Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(2): 553-602.
50. Rouse, Cecilia Elena, Jane Hannaway, Dan Goldhaber, and David Figlio. 2007. Feeling the Florida heat? How low-performance schools respond to voucher and accountability pressure. NBER Working Paper No. 13681.
51. Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
52. Sander, William. 1999. Private schools and public school achievement. Journal of Human Resources 34(4): 697-709.
53. Schneider, Mark, and Jack Buckley. 2007. What do parents want from schools?Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24:133-44.
54. Schneider, Mark, Melissa Marschall, Paul Teske, and Christine Roch. 1998. School choice and culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly 79(3): 498-501.
55. Schneider, Mark, Paul Teske, and Melissa Marschall. 2000. Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Stewart, Thomas, Patrick J. Wolf, and Stephen Q. Cornman. 2007. Parent and student voices on the first year of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program. Peabody Journal of Education 82(2-3): 311-86.
57. Stigler, George. 1961. The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy 69(53): 213-25.
58. Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416-24.
59. Venegoni, Charles, and David J. Ferraro. 2004. A regulated market model: Considering school choice in the Netherlands as a model for the United States. In Educating citizens: International perspectives on civic values and school choice, edited by Patrick J. Wolf and Stephen Macedo, pp. 368-82. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
60. West, Martin R., and Paul E. Peterson. 2006. The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems: Results from legislatively induced experiments. Economic Journal 116(510): C46-C62.
61. Witte, John F. 2000. The market approach to education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62. Wolf, Patrick J. 2007. Civics exam: Schools of choice boost civic values. Education Next 7(3): 66-72.
63. Wolf, Patrick J. 2008. School voucher programs: What the research says about parental school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review 2008(2): 415-46.
64. Wolf, Patrick, Babette Gutmann, Michael Puma, Brian Kisida, Lou Rizzo, and Nada O. Eissa. 2009. The evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after three years.U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, NCEE 2009-4050. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
65. Wolf, Patrick, Babette Gutmann, Michael Puma, Brian Kisida, Lou Rizzo, Nada Eissa, and Marsha Silverberg. 2008. Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after two years.U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, NCEE 2008-4023. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.