Enhanced early-latency electromagnetic activity in the left premotor cortex is associated with successful phonetic categorization

NeuroImage

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1937-1946

  Alho, Jussi ^a   Sato, Marc ^b   Sams, Mikko ^a   Schwartz, Jean Luc ^b   Tiitinen, Hannu ^a   Jääskeläinen, Iiro P ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory; Dorsal stream; Magnetoencephalography; Motor; Premotor cortex; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMITATION; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PITCH; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUPRAMARGINAL GYRUS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858111406     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ahveninen J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Raij T., Bonmassar G., Devore S., Hamalainen M., Levanen S., Lin F.H., Sams M., Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Witzel T., Belliveau J.W. Task-modulated "what" and "where" pathways in human auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:14608-14613.
2. Andersen R.A., Cui H. Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron 2009, 63:568-583.
3. Arnott S.R., Binns M.A., Grady C.L., Alain C. Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. NeuroImage 2004, 22:401-408.
4. Bar M., Kassam K.S., Ghuman A.S., Boshyan J., Schmid A.M., Dale A.M., Hamalainen M.S., Marinkovic K., Schacter D.L., Rosen B.R., Halgren E. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:449-454.
5. Binder J.R., Liebenthal E., Possing E.T., Medler D.A., Ward B.D. Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:295-301.
6. Boatman D. Cortical bases of speech perception: evidence from functional lesion studies. Cognition 2004, 92:47-65.
7. Boersma P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proc. Inst. Phon. Sci. 1993, 17:97-110.
8. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 2001, 5:341-345.
9. Callan D., Callan A., Gamez M., Sato M.A., Kawato M. Premotor cortex mediates perceptual performance. NeuroImage 2010, 51:844-858.
10. Callan D.E., Jones J.A., Callan A.M., Akahane-Yamada R. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. NeuroImage 2004, 22:1182-1194.
11. Coch D., Sanders L.D., Neville H.J. An event-related potential study of selective auditory attention in children and adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:605-622.
12. Colby C.L., Goldberg M.E. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1999, 22:319-349.
13. Crowley K.E., Colrain I.M. A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:732-744.
14. Curio G., Neuloh G., Numminen J., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2000, 9:183-191.
15. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B.R., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J.W., Lewine J.D., Halgren E. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 2000, 26:55-67.
16. D'Ausilio A., Bufalari I., Salmas P., Fadiga L. The role of the motor system in discriminating normal and degraded speech sounds. Cortex 2011, doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.017.
17. Davis C., Kislyuk D., Kim J., Sams M. The effect of viewing speech on auditory speech processing is different in the left and right hemispheres. Brain Res. 2008, 1242:151-161.
18. Diehl R.L., Lotto A.J., Holt L.L. Speech perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004, 55:149-179.
19. Fischl B. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:11-22.
20. Fowler C.A. Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 99:1730-1741.
21. Galantucci B., Fowler C.A., Turvey M.T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13:361-377.
22. Guenther F.H., Ghosh S.S., Tourville J.A. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 2006, 96:280-301.
23. Hamalainen M.S., Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1994, 32:35-42.
24. Hamalainen M.S., Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1989, 36:165-171.
25. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413.
26. Helmholtz H.V. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik 1867, Leopold Voss, Leipzig.
27. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:131-138.
28. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:393-402.
29. Hickok G., Houde J., Rong F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 2011, 69:407-422.
30. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1998, 22:324-333.
31. Jaaskelainen I.P. The role of speech production system in audiovisual speech perception. Open Neuroimaging J. 2010, 4:30-36.
32. Jääskeläinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Andermann M.L., Belliveau J.W., Raij T., Sams M. Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions. Brain Res. 2011, 1422:66-81.
33. Kauramaki J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Hari R., Mottonen R., Rauschecker J.P., Sams M. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:1314-1321.
34. Kudo N., Nakagome K., Kasai K., Araki T., Fukuda M., Kato N., Iwanami A. Effects of corollary discharge on event-related potentials during selective attention task in healthy men and women. Neurosci. Res. 2004, 48:59-64.
35. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
36. Liberman A.M., Whalen D.H. On the relation of speech to language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:187-196.
37. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 1967, 74:431-461.
38. Liikkanen L.A., Tiitinen H., Alku P., Leino S., Yrttiaho S., May P.J. The right-hemispheric auditory cortex in humans is sensitive to degraded speech sounds. Neuroreport 2007, 18:601-605.
39. Lin F.H., Belliveau J.W., Dale A.M., Hamalainen M.S. Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27:1-13.
40. Makela A.M., Alku P., May P.J., Makinen V., Tiitinen H. Left-hemispheric brain activity reflects formant transitions in speech sounds. Neuroreport 2005, 16:549-553.
41. Meister I.G., Wilson S.M., Deblieck C., Wu A.D., Iacoboni M. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1692-1696.
42. Miettinen I., Tiitinen H., Alku P., May P.J. Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11:24.
43. Miettinen I., Alku P., Salminen N., May P.J., Tiitinen H. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise. Brain Res. 2011, 1367:298-309.
44. Mottonen R., Watkins K.E. Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:9819-9825.
45. Naatanen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
46. Nishitani N., Hari R. Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics. Neuron 2002, 36:1211-1220.
47. Novak G., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgements. Psychophysiology 1992, 29:398-411.
48. Obleser J., Kotz S.A. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:633-640.
49. Obleser J., Elbert T., Lahiri A., Eulitz C. Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 15:207-213.
50. Obleser J., Wise R.J., Alex Dresner M., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2283-2289.
51. Ojanen V., Mottonen R., Pekkola J., Jaaskelainen I.P., Joensuu R., Autti T., Sams M. Processing of audiovisual speech in Broca's area. NeuroImage 2005, 25:333-338.
52. Pekkola J., Ojanen V., Autti T., Jaaskelainen I.P., Mottonen R., Tarkiainen A., Sams M. Primary auditory cortex activation by visual speech: an fMRI study at 3 T. Neuroreport 2005, 16:125-128.
53. Poeppel D., Phillips C., Yellin E., Rowley H.A., Roberts T.P., Marantz A. Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 1997, 221:145-148.
54. Pulvermuller F., Huss M., Kherif F., del Prado Moscoso, Martin F., Hauk O., Shtyrov Y. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:7865-7870.
55. Raij T., Ahveninen J., Lin F.H., Witzel T., Jaaskelainen I.P., Letham B., Israeli E., Sahyoun C., Vasios C., Stufflebeam S., Hamalainen M., Belliveau J.W. Onset timing of cross-sensory activations and multisensory interactions in auditory and visual sensory cortices. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31:1772-1782.
56. Rauschecker J.P. An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration. Hear. Res. 2011, 271:16-25.
57. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:718-724.
58. Rauschecker J.P., Tian B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97:11800-11806.
59. Romero L., Walsh V., Papagno C. The neural correlates of phonological short-term memory: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1147-1155.
60. Ross B., Tremblay K. Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners. Hear. Res. 2009, 248:48-59.
61. Sams M., Hamalainen M., Antervo A., Kaukoranta E., Reinikainen K., Hari R. Cerebral neuromagnetic responses evoked by short auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 61:254-266.
62. Sato M., Tremblay P., Gracco V.L. A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain Lang. 2009, 111:1-7.
63. Schwartz J.-L., Sato M., Fadiga L. The common language of speech perception and action: a neurocognitive perspective. Rev. Fr. Linguist. Appl. 2008, 13:9-22.
64. Schwartz J.-L., Basirat A., Ménard L., Sato M. The perception-for-action-control theory (PACT): a perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. J. Neurolinguist. 2010, doi:10.1016/j.neuroling.2009.12.004.
65. Scott S.K. Auditory processing-speech, space and auditory objects. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:197-201.
66. Scott S.K., Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26:100-107.
67. Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Ahveninen J., Tervaniemi M., Alku P., Ilmoniemi R.J., Naatanen R. Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 251:141-144.
68. Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Ilmoniemi R.J., Naatanen R. Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuroreport 1999, 10:2189-2192.
69. Skipper J.I., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception. NeuroImage 2005, 25:76-89.
70. Skipper J.I., van Wassenhove V., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2387-2399.
71. Watkins K., Paus T. Modulation of motor excitability during speech perception: the role of Broca's area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16:978-987.
72. Whiting K.A., Martin B.A., Stapells D.R. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da. Ear Hear. 1998, 19:218-231.
73. Wilson S.M., Iacoboni M. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. NeuroImage 2006, 33:316-325.
74. Wilson S.M., Saygin A.P., Sereno M.I., Iacoboni M. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:701-702.
75. Zekveld A.A., Heslenfeld D.J., Festen J.M., Schoonhoven R. Top-down and bottom-up processes in speech comprehension. NeuroImage 2006, 32:1826-1836.