Evidence for dissociable representations for body image and body schema from a patient with visual neglect

Neurocase

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 473-479

  Preston, Catherine ^a   Newport, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body image; Body schema; Fake limbs; MIRAGE system; Multiple body representations; Rubber hand illusion; Supernumerary limbs; Visual neglect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN DAMAGE; CASE REPORT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HAND MOVEMENT; HAND PROSTHESIS; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; AGNOSIA; CHRONIC BRAIN DISEASE; FRONTAL LOBE; HAND; ILLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; PARIETAL LOBE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION;

AGNOSIA; BODY IMAGE; BRAIN DAMAGE, CHRONIC; FRONTAL LOBE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84858020706     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: 14653656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2010.532504     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. and Goodale, M. A. 1995. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5: 679-685.
2. Botvinik, M. and Cohen, J. 1998. Rubber hands 'feel' the touch that eyes see. Nature, 391: 756
3. Dummer, T., Picot-Annand, A., Neal, T. and Moore, C. 2009. Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38: 271-280.
4. Franck, N., Farrer, C., Georgieff, N., Marie-Cardine, M., Dalery, J., d'Amato, T. and Jeannerod, M. 2001. Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158: 454-459.
5. Gallagher, S. 2000. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 14-21.
6. Gallagher, S. 2005. How the body shapes the mind, New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Heilman, K. M. and Valenstein, E. 1979. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2): 166-170.
8. Holmes, N. P., Snijders, H. J. and Spence, C. 2006. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 68: 685-701.
9. Kammers, M. P. M., van der Ham, I. J. M. and Dijkerman, H. C. 2006. Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action. Neuropsychologia, 44: 2430-2436.
10. Kammers, M. P. M., de Vignemont, F., Verhagen, L. and Dijkerman, H. C. 2009. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia, 47: 204-211.
11. Maravita, A. and Iriki, A. 2004. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 79-85.
12. Michel, C., Pisella, L., Prablanc, C., Rode, G. and Rossetti, Y. 2007. Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: Single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19: 341-350.
13. Newport, R., Preston, C., Pearce, R. and Holton, R. 2009. Eye rotation does not contribute to shifts in subjective straight ahead: Implications for prism adaptation and neglect. Neuropsychologia, 47: 2008-2012.
14. Newport, R., Pearce, R. and Preston, C. 2010. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research, 204: 385-395.
15. Paillard, J. 1991. "Knowing where and knowing how to get there". In Brain and space, Edited by: Paillard, J. 461-481. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Paillard, J. 1999. "Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients". In Motor control, today and tomorrow, Edited by: Gantachev, G. N., Mori, S. and Massion, J. 197-214. Sofia, Bulgaria: Academic Publishing House.
17. Preston, C. and Newport, R. 2008. Misattribution of movement agency following right parietal TMS. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2: 26-32.
18. Preston, C., Jenkinson, P. and Newport, R. 2010. Anosognosia for hemiplegia as a global deficit in motor awareness: Evidence from the non-paralysed limb. Neuropsychologia, 48(12): 3443-3450.
19. Ramachandran, V. S. 1995. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(1): 22-51.
20. Rode, G., Pisella, L., Rossetti, Y., Farne, A. and Boisson, D. 2003. Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: Visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect. Progress in Brain Research, 142: 271-283.
21. Shimada, S., Hiraki, K. and Oda, I. 2005. The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. Neuroimage, 24: 1225-1232.
22. Spence, S. A., Brooks, D. J., Hirsch, S. R., Liddle, P. F., Meehan, J. and Grasby, P. M. 1997. A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain, 120: 1997-2011.
23. Tsakiris, M. and Haggard, P. 2005. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31: 80-91.
24. Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G. and Haggard, P. 2006. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15: 423-432.