Exploring the gap between dynamic and constraint-based models of metabolism

Metabolic Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 112-119

  Machado, Daniel ^a   Costa, Rafael S ^a   Ferreira, Eugénio C ^a   Rocha, Isabel ^a   Tidor, Bruce ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint based models; Dynamic models; Metabolic networks; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

CARBON METABOLISM; COMPARE AND ANALYZE; CONSTRAINT-BASED; DYNAMIC FORMULATION; FEASIBLE REGIONS; FLUX MODEL; KINETIC RATE LAW; METABOLIC NETWORK; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION; SOLUTION SPACE; STEADY STATE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

DYNAMIC MODELS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

CARBON; GLUCOSE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBON METABOLISM; DYNAMIC MODEL; ENZYME KINETICS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; GLYCOLYSIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CARBON; ESCHERICHIA COLI; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84858002174     PISSN: 10967176     EISSN: 10967184     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beard D., Liang S., Qian H. Energy balance for analysis of complex metabolic networks. Biophys. J. 2002, 83(1):79-86.
2. Burgard A., Pharkya P., Maranas C. OptKnock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 84(6):647-657.
3. Chassagnole C., Noisommit-Rizzi N., Schmid J., Mauch K., Reuss M. Dynamic modeling of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79(1):53-73.
4. Covert M., Palsson B. Constraints-based models: regulation of gene expression reduces the steady-state solution space. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 221(3):309-325.
5. Edwards J., Palsson B. Metabolic flux balance analysis and the in silico analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 gene deletions. BMC Bioinformatics 2000, 1(1):1.
6. Gianchandani E., Papin J., Price N., Joyce A., Palsson B. Matrix formalism to describe functional states of transcriptional regulatory systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2(8):e101.
7. Hoppe A., Hoffmann S., Holzhütter H. Including metabolite concentrations into flux balance analysis: thermodynamic realizability as a constraint on flux distributions in metabolic networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1:23.
8. Ibarra R., Edwards J., Palsson B. Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 2002, 420(6912):186-189.
9. Jamshidi N., Palsson B. Mass action stoichiometric simulation models: incorporating kinetics and regulation into stoichiometric models. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:175-185.
10. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295(5560):1662-1664.
11. Le Novere N., Bornstein B., Broicher A., Courtot M., Donizelli M., Dharuri H., Li L., Sauro H., Schilstra M., Shapiro B., Snoep J., Hucka M. BioModels database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34(suppl 1):D689.
12. Lee J., Gianchandani E., Eddy J., Papin J. Dynamic analysis of integrated signaling, metabolic, and regulatory networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4(5):e1000086.
13. Leighty R., Antoniewicz M. Dynamic metabolic flux analysis (DMFA): a framework for determining fluxes at metabolic non-steady state. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13(6):745-755.
14. Makhorin, A., 2006. GLPK - The GNU Linear Programming Toolkit, http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/.
15. Oberhardt M., PuchaŁka J., dos Santos V., Papin J. Reconciliation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for comparative systems analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7(3):e1001116.
16. Oddone G., Mills D., Block D. A dynamic, genome-scale flux model of Lactococcus lactis to increase specific recombinant protein expression. Metab. Eng. 2009, 11(6):367-381.
17. Patil K., Rocha I., Forster J., Nielsen J. Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(1):308.
18. Rizzi M., Baltes M., Theobald U., Reuss M. In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: II. Mathematical model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997, 55(4):592-608.
19. Rocha I., Maia P., Evangelista P., Vilaça P., Soares S., Pinto J., Nielsen J., Patil K., Ferreira E., Rocha M. OptFlux: an open-source software platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4(1):45.
20. Rojas I., Golebiewski M., Kania R., Krebs O., Mir S., Weidemann A., Wittig U. SABIO-RK: a database for biochemical reactions and their kinetics. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1(Suppl 1):S6.
21. Schomburg I., Chang A., Schomburg D. BRENDA, enzyme data and metabolic information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30(1):47-49.
22. Segrè D., Vitkup D., Church G. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99(23):15112-15117.
23. Shlomi T., Berkman O., Ruppin E. Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102(21):7695-7700.
24. Smallbone K., Simeonidis E., Swainston N., Mendes P. Towards a genome-scale kinetic model of cellular metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4(1):6.
25. Smith R. Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Oper. Res. 1984, 32(6):1296-1308.
26. Stephanopoulos G. Metabolic engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 58(2-3):119-120.
27. Tan Y., Lafontaine Rivera J., Contador C., Asenjo J., Liao J. Reducing the allowable kinetic space by constructing ensemble of dynamic models with the same steady-state flux. Metab. Eng. 2010, 13(1):60-75.
28. Tran L., Rizk M., Liao J. Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. Biophys. J. 2008, 95(12):5606-5617.
29. Varma A., Palsson B. Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60(10):3724-3731.
30. Wiback S., Famili I., Greenberg H., Palsson B. Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 228(4):437-447.
31. Wiechert W. 13C metabolic flux analysis. Metab. Eng. 2001, 3(3):195-206.
32. Yugi K., Nakayama Y., Kinoshita A., Tomita M. Hybrid dynamic/static method for large-scale simulation of metabolism. Theor. Biol. Med. Modelling 2005, 2(1):42.