Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: Results from an independent centre

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 315-321

  Coulter, G ^a   Young, D A ^a   Dalziel, R E ^a   Shimmin, A J ^a  

^a Melbourne Orthopaedic Group   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; BONE ATROPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; HIP ACETABULAR LYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP FEMORAL NECK LYSIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857879361     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.28185     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:177-184. (Pubitemid 38386853)
2. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-170. (Pubitemid 40282567)
3. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1431-1438. (Pubitemid 350273235)
4. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Kamali A, et al. Ten-year results of a double-heat-treated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:20-27.
5. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-329.
6. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984;66-A:228-241. (Pubitemid 14150389)
7. Cumming D, Fordyce MJ. Non-operative management of a peri-prosthetic subcapital fracture after metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:1055-1056. (Pubitemid 37160695)
8. Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW. Roentgen stereophoto-grammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:172-176. (Pubitemid 38386852)
9. Madhu TS, Akula MR, Raman RN, Sharma HK, Johnson VG. The Birmingham hip resurfacing prosthesis: an independent single surgeon's experience at 7-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1-8.
10. van der Weegen W, Hoekstra HJ, Sijbesma T, et al. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:298-306.
11. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:1566-1574.
12. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:847-851. (Pubitemid 352009768)
13. Graves S, Davidson D, de Steiger R, et al. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry: Annual Report 2010. http://www.dmac.adelaide. edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport-2010.pdf (date last accessed 3 November).
14. Wall L. Johnson and Johnson Pty. Ltd.: surgeon notification letter. http://www.depuy.com/sites/default/files/Surgeon%20Letter.pdf (date last accessed 2 November 2011).
15. No authors listed. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency: medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements, 2010 (MDA/2010/033). http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetywarnings/ MedicalDeviceAlerts/CON079157 (date last accessed 2 November 2011).
16. No authors listed. Socrates patient satisfaction survey. http://www.socratesortho.com (date last accessed 2 November 2011).
17. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1010-1014. (Pubitemid 47492792)
18. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4:10.
19. Klassbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score: an extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 2003;32:46-51. (Pubitemid 36169519)
20. No authors listed. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). http://www.koos.nu/ (date last accessed 4 January 2012).
21. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54-B:61-76.
22. Shimmin AJ, Baré JV. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am 2011;42:143-151.
23. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 1998;3:169-186. (Pubitemid 28259347)
24. Lombardi AV Jr, Skeels MD, Berend KR, Adams JB, Franchi OJ. Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2011;469:1547-1553.
25. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329(Suppl):89- 98.
26. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:735-741. (Pubitemid 46564276)
27. Capello WN, Trancik TM, Misamore G, Eaton R. Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982;170:50-55. (Pubitemid 12034321)
28. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:27-33.
29. Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1344-1350.
30. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:572-579.
31. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1291-1297.
32. Lazennec JY, Riwan A, Gravez F, et al. Hip spine relationships: application to total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2007;17:91-104.
33. Latteier MJ, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, et al. Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26(Suppl):19-23.
34. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Murray DW, Gill HS. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1527-1534.
35. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, et al. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1019-1024. (Pubitemid 47492794)
36. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:469-476.
37. Baker RP, Pollard TC, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:158-163.
38. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
39. Lilikakis AK, Vowler SL, Villar RN. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:215-222.
40. Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek RM. Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on- metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:1105-1109.