Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2011, Pages 19-23

  Latteier, Michael J ^a   Berend, Keith R ^a,b,c   Lombardi, Adolph V ^a,b,c   Ajluni, Andrew F ^a   Seng, Brian E ^a   Adams, Joanne B ^a  

^a Joint Implant Surgeons Inc   (United States)

^b MOUNT CARMEL HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender difference; Hypersensitivity; Metal on metal; Pseudotumor; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; METAL ON METAL TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84868303108     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Affatato S, Leardini W, Jedenmalm A, et al. Larger diameter bearings reduce wear in metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;456:153.
2. Cuckler JM. The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:132 Review.
3. Lombardi Jr AV, Mallory TH, Cuckler JM, et al. Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(7 Suppl 2):42.
4. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, et al. Failed metal-onmetal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468:2313.
5. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, et al. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1515.
6. Vendittoli PA, Roy A, Mottard S, et al. Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and largediameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a followup study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:12.
7. Engh Jr CA, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S, et al. 2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-onmetal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:101.
8. Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Hallab NJ, et al. Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:69.
9. Angadji A, Royle M, Collins SN, et al. Influence of cup orientation on the wear performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2009;223:449.
10. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1291 Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):700.
11. GriffinWL, Nanson CJ, Springer BD, et al. Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: a cause of runaway wear and early failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2328.
12. Jeffers JR, Roques A, Taylor A, et al. The problem with large diameter metal-on-metal acetabular cup inclination. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009;67:189.
13. Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, et al. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1025.
14. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:847.
15. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1566.
16. Williams S, Leslie I, Isaac G, et al. Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(Suppl 3):111.