Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2096-2098

  Kucumen, Raciha Beril ^a   Yenerel, Nursal Melda ^a   Gorgun, Ebru ^a   Kulacoglu, Destan Nil ^a   Oncel, Banu ^a   Kohen, Maryo Cenk ^a   Alimgil, Murat Levent ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; R FACTOR; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VISCOELASTICITY;

BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; ELASTICITY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 56249109095     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Luce D.A. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 156-162
2. Liu J., and Roberts C.J. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement; quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 146-155
3. Pepose J.S., Feigenbaum S.K., Qazi M.A., Sanderson J.P., and Roberts C.J. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143 (2007) 39-47
4. Ortiz D., Piñero D., Shabayek M.H., Arnalich-Montiel F., and Alió J.L. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 1371-1375
5. Shah S., Laiquzzaman M., Bhojwani R., Mantry S., and Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the Ocular Response Analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 (2007) 3026-3031. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/48/7/3026 Accessed August 23, 2008
6. Congdon N.G., Broman A.T., Bandeen-Roche K., Grover D., and Quigley H.A. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 141 (2006) 868-875
7. Kirwan C., and O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 86 (2008) 215-218
8. Medeiros F., and Weinreb R.N. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma 15 (2006) 364-370
9. Herndon L.W. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17 (2006) 115-119
10. Falkenberg B., Kutschan A., and Wiegand W. Analyse der optisch wirksamen Parameter nach Kataraktoperation mit Faltlinsenimplantation. [Analysis of optical parameters after cataract surgery and implantation of foldable lens.]. Ophthalmologe 102 (2005) 587-591
11. Hager A., Loge K., Füllhas M.-O., Schroeder B., Groβherr M., and Wiegand W. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 144 (2007) 341-346