Time-referenced effects of an internal vs. external focus of attention on muscular activity and compensatory variability

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue DEC, 2010, Pages

  Hossner, Ernst Joachim ^a   Ehrlenspiel, Felix ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Compensatory variability; Electromyography; External focus; Focus of attention; Internal focus; kinematics; Motor control; Nodal point hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857833406     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00230     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arutyunyan, G. H., Gurfinkel, V. S., and Mirskii, M. L. (1968). Investigation of aiming at a target. Biophysics 13, 536-538.
2. Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46, 610-620.
3. Beilock, S. L., and Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 701-725.
4. Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., and Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skill. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 8, 6-16.
5. Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., and Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 584-600.
6. Bernstein, N. A. (1944/1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press (Original work published 1944).
7. Bliss, C. B. (1892). Investigations in reaction time and attention. Stud. Yale Psychol. Lab. 1, 1-55.
8. Boder, D. P. (1935). The influence of concomitant activity and fatigue upon certain forms of reciprocal hand movement and its fundamental components. Comp. Psychol. Monogr. 11.
9. Bootsma, R. J. (1988). The Timing of Rapid Interceptive Actions. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
10. Bullock, D., and Grossberg, S. (1988). "The VITE model: a neural command circuit for generating arm and articulator trajectories," in Dynamic Patterns in Complex Systems, eds. J. A. S. Kelso, A. J. Madell, and M. F. Schlesinger (Singapore: World Scientific), 305-326.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cohen, R. G., and Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp. Brain Res. 157, 486-495.
13. Cordier, P., Mendès France, M., Pailhous, J., and Bolon, P. (1994). Entropy as a global variable of the learning process. Hum. Mov. Sci. 13, 745-764.
14. Cordo, P. J. (1990). Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. J. Neurophysiol. 63, 161-172.
15. Darling, W. G., and Cooke, J. D. (1987). Movement related EMGs become more variable during learning of fast accurate movements. J. Mot. Behav. 19, 311-331.
16. Delagi, E. F., and Perotto, M. D. (1981). Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer - The Limbs. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
17. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., and Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 18, 1-11.
18. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychol. Rev. 77, 73-99.
19. Hancock, G. R., Butler, M. S., and Fischman, M. G. (1995). On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. J. Mot. Behav. 27, 241-250.
20. Hermens, H. J., Freriks, B., Merletti, R., Hägg, G., Stegeman, D. F., Blok, J., Rau, G., and Disselhorst-Klug, C. (1999). SENIAM 8: European Recommendations for Surface ElectromyoGraphy. Enschede: Roessingh Research and Development.
21. Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis. [Prediction and Reason]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
22. Hoffmann, J. (2003). "Anticipatory behavioral control," in Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems, eds. M. Butz, O. Sigaud, and P. Gerard (Berlin: Springer), 44-65.
23. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychol. Res. 73, 512-526.
24. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., and Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework of perception and action. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 869-937.
25. Hossner, E.-J. (2009). "A cognitive movement scientist's view on the link between thought and action: insights form the 'Badische Zimmer' metaphor," in Mind and Motion: The Bidirectional Link Between Thought and Action, eds. M. Raab, J. G. Johnson, and H. R. Heekeren (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 25-34.
26. James, W. (1890/2010). The Principles of Psychology. Available at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles [Retrieved May 10 2010] (Original work published 1890).
27. Lewis, B., and Linder, D. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23, 937-944.
28. Lohse, K. R., Sherwood, D., and Healy, A. F. (2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Hum. Mov. Sci. 29, 542-555.
29. Lotze, R. H. (1852/1966). Medicinische Psychologie oder Die Physiologie der Seele [Medical Psychology or Physiology of the Soul]. Amsterdam: Bonset (Original work published 1852).
30. Marchant, D. C. (2010). Attentional focusing instructions and force production. Front. Psychol. 1:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00210
31. Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: the role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. Br. J. Psychol. 83, 343-358.
32. Masters, R. S. W., Polman, R. C. J., and Hammond, N. V. (1993). "Reinvestment": a dimension of personality implicated in skill breakdown under pressure. Pers. Individ. Dif. 14, 655-666.
33. McDonald, P. V., van Emmerik, R. E., and Newell, K. M. (1989). The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. J. Mot. Behav. 21, 245-264.
34. McNevin, N. H., Shea, C. H., and Wulf, G. (2003). Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychol. Res. 67, 22-29.
35. Morrison, S., and Newell, K. M. (2000). Limb stiffness and postural tremor in the arm. Motor. Control. 4, 293-315.
36. Müller, H. (2001). Ausführungsvariabilität und Ergebniskonstanz [Performance Variability and Result Constancy]. Lengerich: Pabst Science.
37. Müller, H., and Loosch, E. (1999). Functional variability and an equifinal path of movement during targeted throwing. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 36, 103-126.
38. Müller, H., and Sternad, D. (2003). A randomization method for calculation of covariation in multiple nonlinear relations: illustrated with the example of goal-directed movements. Biol. Cybern. 89, 22-33.
39. Pijpers, J. R., Oudejans, R. R. D., and Bakker, F. C. (2005). Anxiety-induced changes in movement behaviour during the execution of a complex whole-body task. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 421-445.
40. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 129-154.
41. Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., and Naumann, E. (2006a). Quantitative Methoden [Quantitative Methods], 2nd Edn, Vol. 1. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
42. Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., and Naumann, E. (2006b). Quantitative Methoden [Quantitative Methods], 2nd Edn, Vol. 2. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
43. Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., and Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion-planning: applications to grasping. Psychol. Rev. 108, 709-734.
44. Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor Control and Learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
45. Shea, C. H., and Wulf, G. (1999). Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Hum. Mov. Sci. 18, 553-571.
46. St. Martin, T., and Frangie, F. (1992). The Art of Shooting Baskets: From the Free Throw to the Slam Dunk. Chicago: Contemporary.
47. Vance, J., Wulf, G., Töllner, T., McNevin, N. H., and Mercer, J. (2004). EMG activity as a function of the performer's focus of attention. J. Mot. Behav. 36, 450-459.
48. Vereijken, B., Van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., and Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing degress of freedom in skill acquisition. J. Mot. Behav. 24, 133-142.
49. Weinberg, R. S. (1978). The effects of success and failure on the patterning of neuromuscular energy. J. Mot. Behav. 10, 53-61.
50. Wing, A. M., and Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept. Psychophys. 14, 5-12.
51. Wulf, G. (2007). Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 10 years of research. J. Bewegung Train. 1, 1-11.
52. Wulf, G., Höß, M., and Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J. Mot. Behav. 30, 169-179.
53. Wulf, G., Lauterbach, B., and Toole, T. (1999). The learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 70, 120-126.
54. Wulf, G., McNevin, N. H., Fuchs, T., Ritter, F., and Toole, T. (2000). Attentional focus in complex skill learning. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 71, 229-239.
55. Wulf, G., McNevin, N., and Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 54, 1143-1154.
56. Wulf, G., and Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 648-660.
57. Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., and Park, J.-H. (2001). Attention and motor performance: preferences for and advantages of an external focus. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 72, 335-344.
58. Wulf, G., and Weigelt, C. (1997). Instructions in learning a complex motor skill: to tell or not to tell. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 68, 362-367.
59. Zachry, T., Wulf, G., Mercer, J., and Bezodis, N. (2005). Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res. Bull. 67, 304-309.