Comparing local and sequential models for statistical incremental natural language understanding

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2010 Conference: 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group onDiscourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 9-16

  Heintze, Silvan ^a   Baumann, Timo ^a   Schlangen, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; LOCAL MODEL; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; SEQUENTIAL MODEL; STATISTICAL MODELS; TRAINING DATA; DATA SET; PERFORMANCE; SEQUENTIAL MODELING; SIMPLE++; STATISTIC MODELING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEACHING;

SPEECH RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84857753970     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. G.S. Aist, J. Allen, E. Campana, L. Galescu, C.A. Gomez Gallo, S. Stoness, M. Swift, and M Tanenhaus. 2006. Software architectures for incremental understanding of human speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (IC-SLP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, September.
2. James Allen, George Ferguson, and Amanda Stent. 2001. An architecture for more realistic conversational systems. In Proceedings of the conference on intelligent user interfaces, Santa Fe, USA, June.
3. Michaela Atterer and David Schlangen. 2009. RUBISC - a robust unification-based incremental semantic chunker. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Representation of Spoken Language (SRSL 2009), Athens, Greece, March.
4. Michaela Atterer, Timo Baumann, and David Schlangen. 2009. No sooner said than done? testing incrementality of semantic interpretations of spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2009, Brighton, UK, September.
5. Deborah A. Dahl, Madeleine Bates, Michael Brown, William Fisher, Kate Hunicke-Smith, David Pallett, Christine Pao, Alexander Rudnicky, and Elizabeth Shriberg. 1994. Expanding the scope of the atis task: the atis-3 corpus. In Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, pages 43-48, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
6. David DeVault, Kenji Sagae, and David Traum. 2009. Can i finish? learning when to respond to incremental interpretation results in interactive dialogue. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL'09), London, UK, September.
7. Raquel Fernández and David Schlangen. 2007. Referring under restricted interactivity conditions. In Simon Keizer, Harry Bunt, and Tim Paek, editors, Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 136-139, Antwerp, Belgium, September.
8. Yulan He and Steve Young. 2005. Semantic processing using the hidden vector state model. Computer Speech and Language, 19(1):85-106.
9. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML, pages 282-289.
10. F. Mairesse, M. Gasic, F. Jurcicek, S. Keizer, B. Thomson, K. Yu, and S. Young. 2009. Spoken language understanding from unaligned data using discriminative classification models. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Taipei, Taiwan, April.
11. Ivan Meza, Sebastian Riedel, and Oliver Lemon. 2008. Accurate statistical spoken language understanding from limited development resources. In In Proceedings of ICASSP.
12. David Milward and Robin Cooper. 1994. Incremental interpretation: Applications, theory, and relationships to dynamic semantics. In Proceedings of COLING 1994, pages 748-754, Kyoto, Japan, August.
13. Brian Roark. 2001. Robust Probabilistic Predictive Syntactic Processing: Motivations, Models, and Applications. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University.
14. Kenji Sagae, Gwen Christian, David DeVault, and David Traum. 2009. Towards natural language understanding of partial speech recognition results in dialogue systems. In Short paper proceedings of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Human Language Technologies conference (NAACL-HLT'09), Boulder, Colorado, USA, June.
15. David Schlangen and Gabriel Skantze. 2009. A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2009), pages 710-718, Athens, Greece, March.
16. David Schlangen, Timo Baumann, and Michaela Atterer. 2009. Incremental reference resolution: The task, metrics for evaluation, and a bayesian filtering model that is sensitive to disfluencies. In Proceedings of SIGdial 2009, the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, London, UK, September.
17. Gabriel Skantze and David Schlangen. 2009. Incremental dialogue processing in a micro-domain. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2009), pages 745-753, Athens, Greece, March.
18. Andreas Stolcke. 1995. An efficient probabilistic context-free parsing algorithm that computes prefix probabilities. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):165-201.
19. Ian H. Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA, 2nd edition.
20. Luke S. Zettlemoyer and Michael Collins. 2007. Online learning of relaxed ccg grammars for parsing to logical form. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL.