Incremental reference resolution: The task, metrics for evaluation, and a Bayesian filtering model that is sensitive to disfluencies

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 30-37

  Schlangen, David ^a   Baumann, Timo ^a   Atterer, Michaela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN FILTERING; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; DISFLUENCIES; REFERENCE RESOLUTION; STRUCTURE INFORMATION; TEST CORPUS;

SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

EID: 84857755004     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. G.S. Aist, J. Allen, E. Campana, L. Galescu, C.A. Gomez Gallo, S. Stoness, M. Swift, and M Tanenhaus. 2006. Software architectures for incremental understanding of human speech. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (IC-SLP), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, September.
2. Jennifer E. Arnold, Carla L. Hudson Kam, and Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2007. If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
3. Karl Bailey and F. Ferreira. 2007. The processing of filled pause disfluencies in the visual world. In R. P. G. von Gompel, M H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, and R. L. Hill, editors, Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, chapter 22. Elsevier.
4. Timo Baumann, Michaela Atterer, and David Schlangen. 2009. Assessing and Improving the Performance of Speech Recognition for Incremental Systems. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2009, Boulder, USA.
5. Susan E. Brennan and Michael F. Schober. 2001. How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44:274-296. (Pubitemid 33379932)
6. Herbert H. Clark and Edward F. Schaefer. 1987. Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2(1):19-41.
7. Robert Dale and Ehud Reiter. 1995. Computational interpretations of the gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 19:233-263.
8. Raquel Fernández, David Schlangen, and Tatjana Lucht. 2007. Push-to-talk ain't always bad! comparing different interactivity settings in task-oriented dialogue. In Proceeding of DECALOG (SemDial'07), Trento, Italy, June.
9. Carlos Gómez Gallo, Gregory Aist, James Allen, William de Beaumont, Sergio Coria, Whitney Gegg-Harrison, Joana Paulo Pardal, and Mary Swift. 2007. Annotating continuous understanding in a multimodal dialogue corpus. In Proceeding of DECALOG (SemDial07), Trento, Italy, June.
10. Florian Schiel. 2004. Maus goes iterative. In Proc. of the IV. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal.
11. Alexander Siebert and David Schlangen. 2008. A simple method for resolution of definite reference in a shared visual context. In Procs of SIGdial, Columbus, Ohio.
12. Gabriel Skantze and David Schlangen. 2009. Incremental dialogue processing in a micro-domain. In Proceedings of EACL 2009, Athens, Greece, April.
13. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings Intl. Conf. Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP'02), Denver, Colorado, USA, September.
14. Scott C. Stoness, Joel Tetreault, and James Allen. 2004. Incremental parsing with reference interaction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing at the ACL 2004, pages 18-25, Barcelona, Spain, July.
15. Michael K. Tanenhaus, Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathllen M. Eberhard, and Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. Intergration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268.
16. Sebastian Thrun, Wolfram Burgard, and Dieter Fox. 2005. Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.