Referring under restricted interactivity conditions

Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 136-139

  Fernández, Raquel ^a   Lucht, Tatjana ^a   Schlangen, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; INTERACTION LEVELS; INTERACTIVITY; PUSH-TO-TALK; TURN-TAKING;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 84857724546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. P. Boersma. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9-10).
2. H. Clark and M. Krych. 2004. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50:62-81. (Pubitemid 38074395)
3. H. Clark and E. Schaefer. 1989. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13:259-294.
4. H. Clark and D. Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22:1-39.
5. R. Ferńandez, D. Schlangen, and T. Lucht. 2007. Push-to-talk ain't always bad! comparing different interactivity settings in task-oriented dialogue. In Proceedings of DECALOG, Trento, Italy.
6. S. Garrod and A. Anderson. 1987. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27:181-218.
7. R. Krauss and S. Weinheimer. 1966. Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4:343-346.
8. C. Müller and M. Strube. 2001. MMAX: A tool for the annotation of multi-modal corpora. In Proceedings of the 2nd IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems.
9. S. Whittaker. 2003. Theories and methods in mediated communication. In The Handbook of Discourse Processes, pages 243-286. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.