Software architectures for incremental understanding of human speech

INTERSPEECH 2006 and 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, INTERSPEECH 2006 - ICSLP

Volumn 4, Issue , 2006, Pages 1922-1925

  Aist, Gregory ^a,c   Allen, James ^a,c   Campana, Ellen ^a,b   Galescu, Lucian ^c   Gallo, Carlos A Gómez ^a   Stoness, Scott C ^a   Swift, Mary ^a   Tanenhaus, Michael ^b  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN AND MACHINE COGNITION   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialogue systems; Incremental understanding; Parsing; Psycholinguistics; Speech understanding

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING; SYNTACTICS;

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; INCREMENTAL UNDERSTANDING; PARSING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH UNDERSTANDING;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 44949178573     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aist, G.S., Campana, E., Allen, J., Rotondo, M., Swift, M., and Tanenhaus, M. Variations along the contextual continuum in task-oriented speech. CogSci 2005.
2. Allen, J., Byron, D., Dzikovska, M., Ferguson, G., Galescu, L. and Stent, A. 2001. Towards conversational human-computer interaction. AI Magazine 22(4): 27-38.
3. Altmann, G.T.M., and Kamide, Y. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: resticting the domain of of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247-264.
4. Chambers, C.G., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Magnuson, J.S., 2004. Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Jnl. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 30: 687-696.
5. Clark, H., and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. 1990. Referring as a collaborative process. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J. and Pollack, M. E., eds. Intentions in Communication, MIT Press. 463-493.
6. DeVault, D., and Stone, M. Domain inference in incremental interpretation. ICOS 2003.
7. Dzikovska, M.O., Allen, J.F., Swift, M.D. Integrating linguistic and domain knowledge for spoken dialogue systems in multiple domains. Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, IJCAI 2003.
8. Fernandez, R., Ginzburg, J., and Lappin, S. Classifying ellipsis in dialogue: A machine learning approach. COLING 2004.
9. Galescu, L., Ringger, E., and Allen, J. Rapid language model development for new task domains. LREC 1998.
10. Hanna, J. E., and Tanenhaus, M.K. 2003 The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Jnl. of Memory and Language 49: 43-61.
11. Higashinaka, R., Miyazaki, N., Nakano, M., and Aikawa, K. A method for evaluating incremental utterance understanding in spoken dialogue systems. ICSLP 2002.
12. Lamere, P., Kwok, P., Gouvêa, E., Bhiksha Raj, Singh, R., Walker, W., Warmuth, M., and Wolf, P. The CMU Sphinx-4 speech recognition system. ICASSP 2003.
13. Rosé, C.P., Roque, A., Bhembe, D., and Van Lehn, K. An efficient incremental architecture for robust interpretation. HLT 2002.
14. Stoness, S.C., Allen, J., Aist, G., and Swift, M. Using real-world reference to improve spoken language understanding. AAAI Workshop on Spoken Language Understanding 2005.
15. Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., and Sedivy, J.C. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268(5217):1632-1634.
16. Tanenhaus, M.K., Magnuson, J.S., Dahan, D., and Chambers, C. 2000. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Jnl. of Psycholinguistic Research 29(6): 557-580.