Using bigrams to identify relationships between student certainness states and tutor responses in a spoken dialogue corpus

Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 87-96

  Forbes Riley, Kate ^a   Litman, Diane J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECTIVE STATE; BIGRAMS; DIALOGUE ACTS; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; TUTORING DIALOGUES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857722379     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. G. Aist, B. Kort, R. Reilly, J. Mostow, and R. Picard. 2002. Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: Adding Human-Provided Emotional Scaffolding to an Automated Reading Tutor that Listens. In Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
2. E. André, L. Dybkjær, W. Minker, and P. Heisterkamp, editors. 2004. Affective Dialogue Systems, Tutorial and Research Workshop, ADS 2004, Kloster Irsee, Germany, June 14-16, 2004, Proceedings, volume 3068 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
3. J. Ang, R. Dhillon, A. Krupski, E. Shriberg, and A. Stolcke. 2002. Prosody-based automatic detection of annoyance and frustration in human-computer dialog. In Proc. International Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).
4. S. Banerjee and T. Pedersen. 2003. The design, implementation, and use of the Ngram Statistic Package. In Proc. 4th International Conference. on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics.
5. K. Bhatt, M. Evens, and S. Argamon. 2004. Hedged responses and expressions of affect in human/human and human/computer tutorial interactions. In Proc. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
6. M. G. Core and J. F. Allen. 1997. Coding dialogues with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In D. Traum, editor, Working Notes: AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, pages 28-35, Menlo Park, California.
7. S. D. Craig and A. Graesser. 2003. Why am I confused: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning. In A. Mendez-Vilas and J.A. Mesa Gonzalez, editors, Advances in Technology-based Education: Towards a Knowledge-based Society Vol 3, pages 1903-1906.
8. K. Forbes-Riley and D. Litman. 2004. Predicting emotion in spoken dialogue from multiple knowledge sources. In Proc. Human Language Technology Conf. of the North American Chap. of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL).
9. K. Forbes-Riley, D. Litman, A. Huettner, and A. Ward. 2005. Dialogue-learning correlations in spoken dialogue tutoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
10. A. Graesser and N. Person. 1994. Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1):104-137.
11. A. Graesser, N. Person, and J. Magliano. 1995. Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9:495-522.
12. R. Higashinaka, M. Nakano, and K. Aikawa. 2003. Corpus-based discourse understanding in spoken dialogue systems. In Proc. Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
13. W. Lewis Johnson, Paola Rizzo, Wauter Bosma, Sander Kole, Mattijs Ghijsen, and Herwin van Welbergen. 2004. Generating socially appropriate tutorial dialog. In André et al. (André et al., 2004), pages 254-264.
14. J. Liscombe, J. Venditti, and J. Hirschberg. 2005. Detecting certainness in spoken tutorial dialogues. In Proc. InterSpeech.
15. D. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley. 2004a. Annotating student emotional states in spoken tutoring dialogues. In Proc. 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue.
16. D. J. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley. 2004b. Predicting student emotions in computer-human tutoring dialogues. In Proc. Assoc. Computational Linguistics (ACL).
17. D. Litman and S. Silliman. 2004. ITSPOKE: An intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Companion Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conf. of the North American Chap. of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (HLT/NAACL).
18. D. J. Litman, C. P. Rose, K. Forbes-Riley, K. VanLehn, D. Bhembe, and S. Silliman. 2004. Spoken versus typed human and computer dialogue tutoring. In Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
19. J. D. Moore, K. Porayska-Pomsta, S. Varges, and C. Zinn. 2004. Generating tutorial feedback with affect. In Proc. of the 17th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Sociey Conference.
20. S. Narayanan. 2002. Towards modeling user behavior in human-machine interaction: Effect of errors and emotions. In Proc. ISLE Workshop on Dialogue Tagging for Multi-modal Human Computer Interaction.
21. N. Reithinger, R. Engel, M. Kipp, and M. Klesen. 1996. Predicting dialogue acts for a speech-to-speech translation system. In Proc. International Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).
22. J. Rickel, N. B. Lesh, C. Rich, C. L. Sidner, and A. Gertner. 2001. Building a bridge between intelligent tutoring and collaborative dialogue systems. In Proc. of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED), pages 592-594.
23. I. Shafran, M. Riley, and M. Mohri. 2003. Voice signatures. In Proc. IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop.
24. F. Shah, M. Evens, J. Michael, and A. Rovick. 2002. Classifying student initiatives and tutor responses in human-human keyboard-to-keyboard tutoring sessions. Discourse Processes, 33(1).
25. A. Stolcke, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, D. Jurafsky, P. Taylor, R. Martin, M. Meteer, and C. Van Ess-Dykema. 2000. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics 26:3.
26. K. VanLehn, P. W. Jordan, C. P. Rosé, D. Bhembe, M. Böttner, A. Gaydos, M. Makatchev, U. Pap-puswamy, M. Ringenberg, A. Roque, S. Siler, R. Sri-vastava, and R. Wilson. 2002. The architecture of Why2-Atlas: A coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.