Building damage scenarios based on exploitation of Housner intensity derived from finite faults ground motion simulations

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 517-545

  Chiauzzi, Leonardo ^a   Masi, Angelo ^a   Mucciarelli, Marco ^a   Vona, Marco ^a   Pacor, Francesca ^b   Cultrera, Giovanna ^b   Gallovič, Frantisek ^c,d   Emolo, Antonio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Building vulnerability; Damage scenario; EMS macroseismic intensity; Finite faults ground motion simulations; Housner intensity

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION FACTORS; BUILDING DAMAGE; DAMAGE ESTIMATION; DAMAGE INDEX; DAMAGE LEVEL; DAMAGE PROBABILITY MATRICES; DAMAGE SCENARIO; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; EMS MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND-MOTION SIMULATION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HOUSNER INTENSITY; MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC DISTRIBUTION; PROBABILITY MASS FUNCTION; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; SEISMIC EVENT; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SITE EFFECTS; SOURCE MODELS; SOUTHERN ITALY; SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAM; TIME HISTORY; URBAN AREAS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS;

BLOCK CODES; BUILDINGS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SEISMOLOGY; TARGET TRACKING;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

BEDROCK; BUILDING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; FAULT DISPLACEMENT; GROUND MOTION; PROBABILITY; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SITE EFFECT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY;

BASILICATA; ITALY; POTENZA;

EID: 84857687589     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-011-9309-8     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology: theory and methods, 2nd edn. University Science Books, New York.
2. Amato A, Selvaggi G (1993) Aftershock location and P-velocity structure in the epicentral region of the 1980 Irpinia earthquake. Ann Geophys 36: 3-15.
3. Ambraseys N (1974) Historical seismicity of north-central Iran. Geol Surv Iran 29: 47-96.
4. Ambraseys N, Smit P, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjorns-son R, Olafsson S, Suhadolc P, Costa G (2004) European strong-motion database, vol 2. European Commission, Research-Directorate General, Environment and Climate Programme. Available at web site http://www. isesd. cv. ic. ac. uk/ESD/.
5. Ameri G, Pacor F, Cultrera G, Franceschina G (2008) Deterministic ground-motion scenarios for engineering applications: the case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(3): 1289-1303.
6. Ameri G, Gallovic F, Pacor F, Emolo A (2009) Uncertainties in strong ground-motion prediction with finite-fault synthetic seismograms: an application to the 1984 M 5. 7 Gubbio, Central Italy, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99: 647-663.
7. Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen RJ (eds) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 438-483.
8. Azzara R, Basili A, Beranzoli L, Chiarabba C, Di Giovanbattista R, Selvaggi G (1993) The seismic sequence of Potenza. Ann Geophys 36(1): 237-243.
9. Azzaro R, Barbano MS, Camassi R, D'Amico S, Mostaccio A, Piangiamore G, Scarfì L (2004) The earthquake of 6 September 2002 and the seismic history of Palermo (Northern Sicily, Italy): implications for the seismic hazard assessment of the city. J Seismol 8: 525-543.
10. Basili R, Valensise G, Vannoli P, Burrato P, Fracassi U, Mariano S, Tiberti MM, Boschi E (2008) The database of individual seismogenic sources (DISS), version 3: summarizing 20 years of research on Italy's earthquake geology. Tectonophysics 453: 20-43.
11. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(2): 501-520.
12. Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA). Bull Earthquake Eng 8(5): 1209-1230.
13. Bommer JJ (2002) Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: an exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy. J Earthq Eng 6(Special Issue 1): 43-73.
14. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160: 635-676.
15. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and ensuing review of the MSK-76 Scale. In: 8th ECEE, Atene.
16. Calvi GM, Pinho R (2004) LESSLOSS-a European integrated project on risk mitigation for earthquakes and landslides, report 2004/02. In: European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
17. Calvi GM, Pinho R, Magenes G, Bommer JJ, Restrepo-Vélez LF, Crowley H (2006) Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET J Earthq Technol, Paper o. 472, 43(3): 75-104.
18. Caputo R, Salviulo L, Piscitelli S, Coperte A (2007) Late quaternary activity along the Scorciabuoi Fault (Southern Italy) as inferred from electrical resistivity tomographies. Ann Geophys 50(2): 137-148.
19. Chapman MC (1995) A probabilistic approach to ground-motion selection for engineering design. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(3): 937-942.
20. Chiarabba C, De Gori P, Chiaraluce L et al (2005) Mainshocks and aftershocks of the 2002 Molise seismic sequence, Southern Italy. J Seismol 9: 487-494.
21. Codermatz R, Nicolich R, Slejko D (2003) Seismic risk assessments and GIS technology: applications to infrastructures in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32: 1677-1690. doi: 10. 1002/eqe. 294.
22. Convertito V, Emolo A, Zollo A (2006) Seismic-hazard assessment for a characteristic earthquake scenario: an integrated probabilistic-deterministic method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(2): 377-391. doi: 10. 1785/0120050024.
23. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58: 1583-1606.
24. CPTI Working Group (2004) Catalogo Parametrico dei Terremoti Italiani, version 2004 (CPTI04). INGV, Milan. Available from http://emidius. mi. ingv. it/CPTI/.
25. Cultrera G, Cirella A, Spagnuolo E, Herrero A, Tinti E, Pacor F (2010) Variability of kinematic source parameters and its implication on the choice of the design scenario. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 941-953.
26. Decanini L, Mollaioli F, Oliveto G (2002) Structural and seismological implications of the 1997 seismic sequence in Umbria and Marche, Italy. In: Oliveto G (eds) Innovative approaches to earthquake engineering. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 229-323.
27. Di Bucci D, Ravaglia A, Seno S, Toscani G, Fracassi U, Valensise G (2006) Seismotectonics of the Southern Apennines and Adriatic foreland: insights on active regional E-W shear zones from analogue modelling. Tectonics 25: TC4015. doi: 10. 1029/2005TC001898.
28. DISS Working Group (2006) Database of individual seismogenic sources (DISS), version 3. 0. 2: a compilation of potential sources for earthquakes larger than M 5. 5 in Italy and surrounding areas. http://www. ingv. it/DISS/, © INGV 2005, 2006-Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-All rights reserved.
29. Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M (2002) EAEE-ESC Task Group 3-Seismic risk and earthquake scenarios-Report of the activities in the frame of the ENSeRVES Project. In: Proceedings of 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, September 2002, London.
30. Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M, Vona M (2003) Earthquake damage scenarios of Potenza town (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earthquake Eng 1(1): 115-140.
31. Dolce M, Kappos AJ, Masi A, Penelis G, Vona M (2006) Vulnerability assessment and earthquake scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using the Italian and Greek methodologies. Eng Struct 28: 357-371.
32. Emolo A, Zollo A (2001) Acceleromatric radiation simulation for the September 26, 1997, Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) main shocks. Ann Geophys 44: 605-617.
33. Emolo A, Cultrera G, Franceschina G, Pacor F, Convertito V, Cocco M, Zollo A (2008) Ground motion scenarios for the 1997 Colfiorito, Central Italy, earthquake. Ann Geophys 51: 509-525.
34. Faccioli E, Cauzzi C (2006) Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios, estimated from instrumentally based correlations. In: European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September 2006.
35. Fracassi U, Valensise G (2007) Unveiling the sources of the catastrophic 1456 multiple earthquake: hints to an unexplored tectonic mechanism in Southern Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(3): 725-748. doi: 10. 1785/0120050250.
36. Galli P, Molin D, Camassi R, Castelli V (2001) Il terremoto del 9 settembre 1998 nel quadro della sismicità storica del confine calabro-lucano. Possibili implicazioni sismotettoniche. Il Quaternario Italian J Quaternary Sci 14: 31-40.
37. Gallovic F, Brokešová J (2004) On strong ground motion synthesis with k-2 slip distributions. J Seismol 8: 211-224.
38. Gallovič F, Brokešová J (2007) Hybrid k-squared source model for strong ground motion simulations: introduction. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 160: 34-50.
39. GNDT Working Group (1990) Evento sismico 05/05/1990. Scheda per il rilevamento dei danni. Istruzioni per la compilazione. Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri-Ufficio del Ministro per il Coordinamento della Protezione Civile. Roma.
40. Grünthal G (ed) (1993) European Macroseismic Scale 1992 (EMS-92). European Seismological Commission, sub commission on Engineering Seismology, working Group Macroseismic Scales. Conseil de l'Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, vol 7, Luxembourg.
41. Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). European Seismological Commission, sub commission on Engineering Seismology, working Group Macroseismic Scales. Conseil de l'Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, vol 15. Luxembourg.
42. Hartzell S, Harmsen S, Frankel A, Larsen S (1999) Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(6): 1484-1504.
43. Herrero A, Bernard P (1994) A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84: 1216-1228.
44. Housner GW (1952) Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes. Second technical report. August 1952, California Institute of Technology Pasedena, California.
45. Improta L, Bonagura M, Capuano P, Iannaccone G (2003) An integrated geophysical investigation of the upper crust in the epicentral area of the 1980, Ms = 6. 9, Irpinia earthquake (Southern Italy). Tectonophysics 361: 139-169.
46. Khater M, Scawthorn C, Johnson JJ (2003) Loss estimation. In: Chen W, Scawthorn C (eds) Earthquake engineering handbook, Chap 31. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
47. Lucantoni A, Bosi V, Bramerini F, De Marco R, Lo Presti T, Naso G, Sabetta F (2001) Il rischio sismico in Italia. Servizio Sismico Nazionale, Ingegneria Sismica, XVIII, No. 1.
48. Mai PM, Beroza GC (2003) A hybrid method for calculating near-source, broadband seismograms: application to strong motion prediction. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 137: 183-199.
49. Marcellini A, Pagani M (2004) Seismic zonation methodologies with particular reference to the Italian situation. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Printed in the Netherlands.
50. Margaris BN, Boore DM (1998) Determination of Δσ and ko from response spectra of large earthquakes in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88: 170-182.
51. Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33: 45-58.
52. Masi A (2003) Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthquake Eng 1(3): 371-395.
53. Masi A, Vona M, Mucciarelli M (2011) Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on RC frames. J Struct Eng ASCE Special Issue devoted to "Earthquake Ground Motion Selection and Modification for Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Structures" 137(3): 367-378.
54. Masi A, Chiauzzi L, Braga F, Mucciarelli M, Vona M, Ditommaso R (2011) Peak and integral seismic parameters of L'Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1): 139-156.
55. McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85(5): 1275-1284.
56. McGuire RK (2001) Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21: 377-384.
57. Medvedev J (1962) Engineering seismology. Akademia Nank Press, Moscow.
58. Medvedev SV (1977) Seismic intensity scale M. S. K.-76. Publ Inst Geophys Pol Acad Sci A-6(117), Varsaw.
59. Molin D (1995) Consideration on the assessment of macroseismic intensity. Ann Geophys 38: 805-810.
60. Mouroux P, Le Brun B (2006) Risk-UE project: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns. In: Oliveira Carlos Sousa, Roca Antoni, Goula Xavier (eds) Assessing and managing earthquake risk geo-scientific and engineering knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation: developments, tools, techniques. Springer Netherlands Publisher, Netherlands, pp 479-508.
61. Mucciarelli M, Camassi R, Gallipoli MR (2002) Collection of macroseismic data in a digital age: lessons from the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73(3): 325-331.
62. NTC08 (2008) D. M. 14 gennaio 2008-Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministero delle Infrastrutture. Available at web site http://www. cslp. it.
63. OPCM 3274 (2003) Ordinanza del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274. Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. GU n. 72 giugno 2003. Available at web site http://www. cslp. it.
64. Pacor F, Mucciarelli M (2007) Scenari di Scuotimento in Aree di Interesse Prioritario e/o Strategico. Progetto DPC-INGV S3. Available at web site http://esse3. mi. ingv. it/index. php.
65. Pacor F, Cultrera G, Mendez A, Cocco M (2005) Finite fault modeling of strong ground motion using a hybrid deterministic-stochastic method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95: 225-240.
66. Pergalani F, Romeo R, Luzi L, Petrini V, Pugliese A, Sanò T (1999) Seismic microzoning of the area struck by Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) Ms 5. 9 earthquake of 26 September 1997. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 18: 279-296.
67. Puglia R, Ditommaso R, Pacor F, Mucciarelli M, Luzi L, Bianca M (2011) Frequency variation in site response as observed from strong motion data of the L'Aquila (2009) seismic sequence. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-011-9266-2.
68. Puglia R, Klin P, Pagliaroli A, Ladina C, Priolo E, Lanzo G, Silvestri F (2009) Local seismic response at san giuliano di puglia by 1d, 2d and 3d models. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica-Italian Geotech J 3. 09: 62-71.
69. RADIUS (1999) Risk assessment tools for diagnosis of urban areas against seismic disasters. Report United Nations initiative towards earthquake safe cities. Available at web site http://www. geohaz. org/projects/radius. html.
70. Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis. Columbia University Press, New York.
71. Rovelli A, Bonamassa O, Cocco M, Di Bona M, Mazza S (1988) Scaling laws and spectral parameters of the ground motion in active extensional areas in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(2): 530-560.
72. Sieberg A (1930) Geologie der Erdbeben. Handbuch der Geophysik 2(4): 550-555.
73. Strollo A, Parolai S, Bindi D, Chiauzzi L, Pagliuca R, Mucciarelli M, Zschau J (2011) Microzonation of Potenza (Southern Italy) in terms of spectral intensity ratio using joint analysis of earthquakes and ambient noise. Bull Earthquake Eng. doi: 10. 1007/s10518-011-9256-4.
74. Tertulliani A, Arcoraci L, Berardi M, Bernardini F, Camassi R, Castellano C, Del Mese S, Ercolani E, Graziani L, Leschiutta I, Rossi A, Vecchi M (2011) An application of EMS-98 in a medium-sized city: the case of L'Aquila (Central Italy) after the april 6, 2009 Mw 6. 3 earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng doi: 10. 1007/s10518-010-9188-4.
75. Ugurhan B, Askan A, Erberik MA (2011) A methodology for seismic loss estimation in urban regions based on ground-motion simulations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2): 710-725. doi: 10. 1785/0120100159.
76. Valensise G, Pantosti D, Basili R (2004) Seismology and tectonic setting of the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20: 23-37.
77. Vona M, Masi A, Puglia R, Silvestri F (2009) A comparison between the surveyed damage on the buildings of San Giuliano di Puglia (Italy) affected by the Molise earthquake (2002) and the estimated damage based on different models of seismic input. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica-Italian Geotech J, Anno XLIII, n. 3 Luglio settembre 2009.
78. Working Group ITACA (2010) Data base of the Italian strong motion data. Available at web site http://itaca. mi. ingv. it.
79. Zollo A, Bobbio A, Emolo A, Herrero A, De Natale G (1997) Modelling of ground acceleration in the near source range: the case of 1976, Friuli earthquake (M = 6. 5), Northern Italy. J Seismol 1: 305-319.